MinamotoKansuke Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Well, have you? Let's swamp them with those e-mails and who knows, maybe we'll get the errata we so desperately need right now. gamefaqs@gwplc.com Reply if you have so the thread stays on top so we can motivate even more people to do the right thing for the greater g... eerm, glory of Sanguinius! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorre Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 I sent one a few days ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aries24 Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Now going too! Our termites should be the same Pts as marine ones! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vel'Cona Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 ANGELS ASSEMBLE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sans Mercy Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 You're better off praying to Mormon Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnorriSnorrison Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Just sent that email off. Let's see how that goes, haha. Never had much luck with prayers. Snorri Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderer Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Yeah, I sent an email to GW last week and even agitated some folks in our community. Wrote a whole lot of text and translated it for them to use since not everybody there knows english. It was a fun weekend) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venemox Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 Do we have a consolidated list of FAQ items we're requesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vahouth Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 What are we requesting for? For starters I'd like my TDA Sanguinary Priests back. It's not game breaking, is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman101 Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 ?? Guessing Codex Marines got some unit discounts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonaides Posted June 18, 2015 Share Posted June 18, 2015 And +2A on dreadnoughts, ws/bs4 scouts and a herioc intervention is changed again, and better than what we have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanguine_Blood Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Hello I have sent off my email to them just now. I hope this happens soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriegsmaschine Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 I sent one just now :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zynk Kaladin Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 *The air cracks and booms as a glorious figure approaches held aloft by mighty wings and spirited by a roaring jump pack. The figure gracefully touches down, angelic iconography and regalia dancing amongst the jet wash. Through the stunning visage of his artisan crafted ceramite battle helm, the angel intones a vox-augmented choir of righteousness* I temporarily leave the hobby after our codex dropped a couple months ago and already we are beset by old age. Ahh just like old times. Sent a courteous email. Hopefully something will come of it, but if not we still have a decent enough 'dex. It can't get any worse than C:CSM(ha!) or orks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinamotoKansuke Posted June 19, 2015 Author Share Posted June 19, 2015 Do we have a consolidated list of FAQ items we're requesting? I don't think there is a consolidated list, it's just about those obvious discrepancies. In my e-mail I wrote about 3 examples: scout stat lines, dreadnought attacks and terminator point costs. I did however mention that there are many more things to address. They made the codex, they know what they changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njjesters4 Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Sent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rezin70 Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 I sent one last week. Got the same canned answer as everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain Angel Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Sent one out less than a minute ago. Fingers crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ming Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Sure, and then everyone will want the Baals we have...frankly, we should paint them gold. It is "known" that it is FAQ /errata time in GW's universe, and that GW sources have leaked that they are being internally developed/argued/approved. I'm waiting. Not expecting much other than clarifications / corrections. If you play BAs as intended - remember your "termites" can easily get furious charge, +1I, and even +1 WS or FNP. We have pretty cool formations for added rule buffs. About the only thing missing would be added attacks for dreads (although ours are unique and arguably better). I was reading the new C:SM last night, and so far the best things were the artwork. There are a few other tweaks, but nothing in the basic unit details are too amazing. They have some cool formations/detachments, but most of those require larger games to be of real value. About the only one I'd use is the stormraven/stormtalon formation, since it is really generic and useable by anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnorriSnorrison Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 Sure, and then everyone will want the Baals we have...frankly, we should paint them gold. They've been wanting our Baals since they first appeared! Not sure what that implies about them Haven't received an answer to my e-mail yet. Off to the painting table then! Snorri Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indefragable Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 To me, it seems like a FAQ/errata is needed to establish what is "baseline" for ALL Astartes. Otherwise, there needs to be a concrete reason as to why the BA/DA/SW DO NOT have those stats. Being able to Squadron Tanks seems like an obvious one (why the heck would other Chapters not be able to do this?) Does the BA recruitment/training process suck compared to other Chapters? Otherwise why would our Scouts be BS4 to EVERYONE else's BS4 (although it would be kinda cool to trade BS4 for WS4...). This should be especially interesting to see what they do for Space Wolves... It also makes you scratch your head that the Chapter most renowned for CQC would have Dreadnoughts with 2x CQC weapons that still have LESS Attacks than a vanilla Dreadnought with an. assault Cannon and Missile Launcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Inritz Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Sent an email about a week ago. Got the answer in a box, but hey, every drop in a bucket helps fill it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildrcheese Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Just sent an email. I doubt it'll do much good, but it's worth a shot I guess. D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafen IX Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Sent one a week ago. Can't add much to what's been said. Except to say, new DA dex seems to be running same stat wise as C:SM meaning we are outdated again. 'Activate 40k Expert mode' R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vahouth Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Been outdated seems to be our chapter trait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.