Indefragable Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 I know another thread got shutdown because it got out of hand but I am wondering if anyone had heard anything about a FAQ/Eratta for Blood Angels with adjustments to be more in line with the recent Codex: Space Marines release. You know, the one with BS4 Scouts, 4A Dreadnoughts, etc... I can not find any news of updates anywhere so I am guessing that silence is deafening. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
knife&fork Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 GW will most likely not do anything of the sorts, but I'd recommenced harassing them for a FAQ/errata anyway ;) Beyond that it's simply a question of asking your local group if you can adjust otherwise identical units between codex BA and SM. Failing that it's pretty easy to just use BA models for 'count as' in a different detachment. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4117473 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indefragable Posted July 8, 2015 Author Share Posted July 8, 2015 GW will most likely not do anything of the sorts, but I'd recommenced harassing them for a FAQ/errata anyway ;) Beyond that it's simply a question of asking your local group if you can adjust otherwise identical units between codex BA and SM. Failing that it's pretty easy to just use BA models for 'count as' in a different detachment. Yea but I want to have my cake and eat it too. Aka I want DC Dreads with 5 Attacks base so they get 8 on the Charge with 2x Blood Talons! And I want it now! My local club tends to have a "play it as the book says" rule which I generally am in favor of...it just happens to hurt me on this case. From their perspective, only official sources count otherwise people could just cherry pick what they like and don't like buffet style. Club leader is a Space Wolves player so if he is not adjusting his stats (SW Scouts that are WORSE than Codex ones?) than I can't justify doing it myself. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4117482 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nova_chron Posted July 8, 2015 Share Posted July 8, 2015 SW scouts are all elite veterans their aspirants are their assault units blood/sky/swift claws... Bad comparison in my opinion but I do agree I would Like our scouts to have BS4 and a dread attack adjustment that's all I care about Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4118111 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodTzar Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 I am not quite sure what do you expect from them ...As I do assume they are more than busy with the recent fail-release of the new WHFB (or w.ever is the name now), I am not sure if you have had a chance to see the rules/rumors, but for me it sets the attitude that the company has now ... I would not expect anything productive coming from GW in a long while ~BT Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4118401 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bukimimaru Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 This thread is heading to a bad place... >.< Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4118496 Share on other sites More sharing options...
knife&fork Posted July 9, 2015 Share Posted July 9, 2015 Yeah I think it's finished for now. If there's a FAQ released or a major tournament updates their package feel free to start a new thread. Until then direct any questions and complaints of this nature to GW directly. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/310835-status-of-post-csm2015-ba-faqerrata/#findComment-4118503 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.