mcpolle Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Hi guys, How come, the Ravenwing formation has 3 choices of HQ, but there is only one, in the form of Azrael?? Polle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Bjoern Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Samael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frater Cornelius Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 GW promised an Errata, but for now it is just Sammy-baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ValourousHeart Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Most gaming groups will probably allow for bike mounted HQ to be included. Also a number of the big tournaments have FAQed it to allow for bike mounted HQ to count. They differ on if they grant the RW rule to those HQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcpolle Posted August 30, 2015 Author Share Posted August 30, 2015 Azrael, was a brain fart, sorry:-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caldria Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I feel like the bike should grant the ravenwing rule just as the terminator armour grants the vengeful strike rule. Though I'm perfectly fine with them not getting the rule and just being accepted for the HQ slots (the ravenwing rule is a lot better than twin linked for one turn after all) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aura_enchanted Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 becausegames workshop did a lot of copy pasta with the marine codex into our codex and thats one of those situations where they did that without looking at it. if you go to tournaments like LVO or adepticon, or or or most of these places have it in their errata that chaplains/interrogators also count for this formation as having the ravenwing rule when on a bike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PariahMessiah Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Hi guys, How come, the Ravenwing formation has 3 choices of HQ, but there is only one, in the form of Azrael?? Polle Do you want an honest answer? Because GW's Codex writers are either 5 years old, dont proof read, or possess the IQ of 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aura_enchanted Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 actually ive taken a look at the rules and well cant the hq command tanks also be taken? the datasheet for them states that "they only require a single hq slot from your army" (meaning they can belong in any detachment) for us dark angels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellSpokenMan Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I don't have that datasheet, but they would seem to be limited to a CAD or allied detachment. The DW & RW formations require their respective rules, so I doubt you'll talk your opponent into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonPhoenix Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 actually ive taken a look at the rules and well cant the hq command tanks also be taken? No. All units in RWSF must have "Ravenwing" special rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.