Jump to content

Is there a chance FW will amend Dorn's rules?


Ishagu

Recommended Posts

If you wanted a close-combat monster you should have picked a different legion msn-wink.gif

Thank you. Way too many rules/gaming obsessed IF players around the AoD forum these days. Easy access to battle scribe and free time to build lists is killing the VII Legion spirit.

But Ishagu posted this and hes Ultramarine to his core

I also dont really see a bunch of IF players who are rules/gaming obsessed either. I see folks building lists sure but thats what you do in the hobby isint it ? When yer not playing or painting something yer working on lists reading fluff , snorting coke off the rear end of a sister of batt- Reading fluff

What Legion Spirit do you think is being killed? The folks who wanna run Sigismund and Templar Brethren and charge into combat ? Isint that what those dudes are for ?

Personally I dont reckon anything is wrong wit Dorn , hes middle of the road fighty wise but he makes up for it in a decent price and good army buffs. Fer the most part Id rather have a Typhon than him tho and thats perfectly fine

I think the main problem is that people see it and the gut reaction is "oh man, this means hell lose in combat to Primarch X!"

 

But in reality unless you are Horus you shouldn't be fighting Primarch X Primarch. It's epic but a silly idea that won't resolve before the game ends....

 

 

I think the unwieldy is meant to represent them versus other primarchs and then it makes sense him and Mort being slower then fulgrim or horus (but maybe not perdy ) but slower then a tac marine is a Lil silly but hey what do you do I think he is ok for his points just not as amazing like some primarchs but we do have sigi and Polux so I'm not complaining

*psst*

 

..Perty is unwieldy with Forgebreaker too!

 

INFERIOR IRON.

 

Perturabo superior, Ferrus Mannus inferior. 

lol comment wasn't directed at Ishagu, more at the folks who want the legion with ZERO drawbacks to have the one handicap removed from their primarch. Seriously there isn't a single negative thing about Imperial Fists (from a rules standpoint).

lol comment wasn't directed at Ishagu, more at the folks who want the legion with ZERO drawbacks to have the one handicap removed from their primarch. Seriously there isn't a single negative thing about Imperial Fists (from a rules standpoint).

I agree.

 

I mean, your opponent forcing Turn 6 on you is HARDLY a Negative. The only potential negative I see is how restrictive the Stone Gauntlet is and how much it takes to run properly.

 

...But then you ignore than and just run Templar and Stomp things in CC and shoot your BPs at Bs5 'cuz why not?

 

+++

 

Also, with Dorns Sundering Blow, he's probably one of the better primarchs around to deal with GMCs. Less attacks but each deal an Extra D3 Wounds due to Instant Death.

 

*revvs the Wraithknight Blender*

 

lol comment wasn't directed at Ishagu, more at the folks who want the legion with ZERO drawbacks to have the one handicap removed from their primarch. Seriously there isn't a single negative thing about Imperial Fists (from a rules standpoint).

I agree.

 

I mean, your opponent forcing Turn 6 on you is HARDLY a Negative. The only potential negative I see is how restrictive the Stone Gauntlet is and how much it takes to run properly.

 

...But then you ignore than and just run Templar and Stomp things in CC and shoot your BPs at Bs5 'cuz why not?

 

+++

 

Also, with Dorns Sundering Blow, he's probably one of the better primarchs around to deal with GMCs. Less attacks but each deal an Extra D3 Wounds due to Instant Death.

 

*revvs the Wraithknight Blender*

 

Exactly. Plus everyone's RoW is restrictive (hence why every terror assault list is practically a clone of each other).

Posted · Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given

lol comment wasn't directed at Ishagu, more at the folks who want the legion with ZERO drawbacks to have the one handicap removed from their primarch. Seriously there isn't a single negative thing about Imperial Fists (from a rules standpoint).

When you preface a response with  lol  it makes it seem like yer mocking the person yer responding to. 

 

As far as the comment in question  I understand it wasant direct at Isagu , it seems to be directed toward new Imperial Fists  HH players who are struggling to figure out lists they want to run.  It struck me as a very  backhanded insult toward those of us who want to run our armies in an effective manner and not just spam dudes with shields and die on  hills ( in ruins )  for fun. 

 

As I mentioned before , I dont think Dorn really needs a change hes fine fer what  he is.  I just dont see the point in saying the spirit of the legion is being ruined by players who want to build thier armies a particular way. 

 

As of Yesterday Ive played  Several Age of Darkness Games and Several Zone Mortalis  and I have been having a lot of fun watching Sigismund kill everything I put him in contact with. I  enjoy playing the legion my way  and its effective ( to a point )  fer me.  Why would I not use battlescribe to figure out how im going to build lists and  choose what im going to buy. Rules Are Important , especially if you plan to play the game. 

I think the main problem is that people see it and the gut reaction is "oh man, this means hell lose in combat to Primarch X!"

But in reality unless you are Horus you shouldn't be fighting Primarch X Primarch. It's epic but a silly idea that won't resolve before the game ends....

Unless the opposing primarch is Horus I'm notorious for throwing Curze at the enemy primarchto tie them up for a turn to save a unit before using hit & run to bail and charge another unit next turn.

In general, yes, unless you want to neutralize both Primarchs for more or less the entirety of a game and thus render them both useless, you generally want to avoid them fighting each other.

 

Horus only wins out because of the Stat Reduction his Claw Causes.

Posted · Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given

How do you report for trolling/baiting when on mobile?

 

Getting really quite sick of certain peoples 'high horse' attitudes in regards to how think think they are superior because of a personal choice in how they play their game.

 

It is a vocal minority which ruins this forum and goes back to what gave b+c the bad name it used to have years and years ago.

 

Getting really quite annoyed with seeing snidey little comments creep in. Tiring, and disappointing.

 

I think the main problem is that people see it and the gut reaction is "oh man, this means hell lose in combat to Primarch X!"

But in reality unless you are Horus you shouldn't be fighting Primarch X Primarch. It's epic but a silly idea that won't resolve before the game ends....

Unless the opposing primarch is Horus I'm notorious for throwing Curze at the enemy primarchto tie them up for a turn to save a unit before using hit & run to bail and charge another unit next turn.

 

Primarch v Primarch battles are something I enjoy. Yes, it ties them both up but it's pretty awesome to see on the tabletop.

Guilliman stops those pesky Hit and Run guys by Dropping them to Initiative 1 ;-)

 

 

But no, it's not tactical. In a competitive game I wouldn't commit to such a lengthy assault.

Posted · Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given

How do you report for trolling/baiting when on mobile?

 

Getting really quite sick of certain peoples 'high horse' attitudes in regards to how think think they are superior because of a personal choice in how they play their game.

 

It is a vocal minority which ruins this forum and goes back to what gave b+c the bad name it used to have years and years ago.

 

Getting really quite annoyed with seeing snidey little comments creep in. Tiring, and disappointing.

I agree. I've been guilty of it too, but I think that's just because I became so jaded with the min/max nature of the 40k community.

 

Dorn is really more of a positive buffer than anything - I honestly don't think all Primarchs should be beatsticks, it just gets boring. Sure he's not as powerful as other Primarchs, but he can still mulch things as would be expected of a primarch. Plus IFs get Siggy, and storm shields, Templar brethren, and assault cannons to name a few. I think they are a far cry from being left in a ditch.

Posted · Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by Flint13, November 18, 2015 - No reason given

How do you report for trolling/baiting when on mobile?

 

Getting really quite sick of certain peoples 'high horse' attitudes in regards to how think think they are superior because of a personal choice in how they play their game.

 

It is a vocal minority which ruins this forum and goes back to what gave b+c the bad name it used to have years and years ago.

 

Getting really quite annoyed with seeing snidey little comments creep in. Tiring, and disappointing.

Did someone say they were superior explicitly or are you reading tone in text again? If you're so tired and disappointed why even bother responding to people who don't like gaming meta?

I just feel bad for the guy, whom given his status as a primarch, still uses a chainsword (albeit a gigantic one) but has to attack at I1 because of it while all the legionaries using one get to strike at actual initiative. Lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.