Jump to content

Lucius


Recommended Posts

As an emperors children player, and a long time fan i cant help but wonder, where is Lucius? I mean we have Khârn, sigi, sevatar, abbadon, but not a whisper of our favorite arrogant B*stard blademaster :P. Id have to assume he'll get a release when they cover the Angel exterminatus part of the heresy or something? Anyone had any thoughts on the topic? 

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/
Share on other sites

I doubt that they'll cover the actual events of Angel Exterminatus, but if the Emperor's Children get another special character Lucius and Fabius are both prime candidates. Come to think of it, they're probably the most well known characters (from the Legions already covered) to not received rules or a mini.

 

Although they're both Traitors, and my Emperor's Children are Loyalists/pre Heresy, I'd definitely buy both minis to paint up. 

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282273
Share on other sites

Yeah, like Kizzdougs mentioned, they'll probably skip out on part of Angel Exterminatus.

 

But we'll probably see a FW book covering the Emperor's Children & Iron Warriors vs Imperial Fists & Mechanicum (the events leading up to AE and the first part of AE until they head off to the Eye). Then the next time we see the IW will be Tallarn and for the EC it'll be... ??? whenever/wherever they show back up.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282275
Share on other sites

We have eidolon the beat stick and poor old tarvitz wasn't done justice but hey.

I'm not sure if we will see vaerosian in the new book, I can't remember if it was said yay or nay.

But Alan Bligh said eventually he'd love to do ec as degenerated and fallen far from the tree.

So don't worry, one day youl get Terrata etc (a new section in black shields makes it possible actually apparently)

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282323
Share on other sites

censored.gif Lucius,

He was never A list material,

Khârn,Amit,Sevatar,Sigismund,Abbadon and Argel Tal where/are the elite warriors of the legions.

Lucius at this point is a journey man contender just someone you have to beat to advance to the next level.

He is pretty much part of the Emperor's Children incarnate along with Eidolon and Julius.

+ Eidolon being the arrogance, pride and superiority.

+ Julius being the excess and degeneracy.

+ Lucius being the Martial superiority and grace with the blade.

I personally would put him as A list material, as he plays a pretty big part in the earlier heresy, especially in Isstvan III betraying the Loyalist segments for his own gain and his childishness and hunger for superiority and power. As much as I hate the Emperor's Children, he is a fantastic character.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282458
Share on other sites

censored.gif Lucius,

He was never A list material,

Khârn,Amit,Sevatar,Sigismund,Abbadon and Argel Tal where/are the elite warriors of the legions.

Lucius at this point is a journey man contender just someone you have to beat to advance to the next level.

Surely you jest :P He might not be the First Captain of his Legion or his Primarch's Equerry, and he is a thoroughly unlikable character with few redeeming qualities, but calling him a 'journey man contender' is ridiculous.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282473
Share on other sites

I agree they wont cover the actual events of Angel exterminatus i just ment that kind of time frame if you get me? :) Aye in an ideal world we'd have rules for Kaesoron etc aswel, but even he compared to Lucius and fabius is a smallfry. Im so surprised hes not had rules or a model yet, hes still about ten thousand years later!!! Im actually semi happy he didnt come out in book 1 because as mentioned above poor Tarvitz is pretty awful on the tabletop and i think id go mad if Lucius had the same kind of crappy rules!!! I am just desperate for a likable EC character that can actually do :cuss on the table, Eidolon is good and that but hes just such a hateful guy, Lucius is just so so cool, and such a badass, the fact he was killed by the above mentioned Raven guard means nothing to me, as said raven guard has so much plot armor he should be an Ultramarine! :P 

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282944
Share on other sites

I think it probably comes down to some difficulty in balancing him. He's been so inconsistant through the BL novels, what do you do with him. Is he the best swordsman in the Legions or is he the guy who keeps getting beat up by "inferior" fighters?

I don't think they'll avoid him forever though and I'm really looking forward to seeing him get the 30K treatment.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282947
Share on other sites

I think it probably comes down to some difficulty in balancing him. He's been so inconsistant through the BL novels, what do you do with him. Is he the best swordsman in the Legions or is he the guy who keeps getting beat up by "inferior" fighters?

I don't think they'll avoid him forever though and I'm really looking forward to seeing him get the 30K treatment.

 

ive always thought he's pretty pretty consistent tbh hes always shown as being a outstanding swordsman, and is never actually bested in a one on one duel until he fights that Lord commander that kills him. When loken beats him he cheats *cough sev* and when the raven guard *cough plot armor* beats him its not like a one on one duel the guys flying about and stuff, i get what you mean though, he is literally shown at one point to single handedly slaughter whole squads of astartes with ease, and dismissively beat other apparent "duelists" with out breaking a sweat, so aye for him to live up to his fluff and be balanced is a tricky one 

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4282961
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to have him be a character that swaps weapon skill with the character he is fighting. That could easily justify his erratic performance in the books.

 

I agree, but are his rules in 40k not similar? And from what ive seen/heard hes awful in 40k (unfortunately) 

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283013
Share on other sites

Swapping WS would probably not work as intended as a Game Mechanic.

 

Consider:

 

Lucius WS 6 or 7 Maximum.

 

Angron WS 9

 

They somehow end up in Combat. EC Characters have to challenge. Angron accepts because Free VPs for MURDERLATING an upstart Peacock.

 

Lucius' Rule kicks in. Suddenly WS9 and Angron is WS7.

 

Table is flipped by the other player because of how nonsensical that is even if the To-Hit difference is marginal at best.

 

+++

 

You also have to consider the main reason why he doesnt have a rule set: Limiting Legions to 3 Characters.

 

Who would you rather see if you only had 2 Slots since 1 is auto-taken by the Primarch?

 

Eidolon, the Big bad of the IIIrd Legion.

Saul Tarvits, the guy who gives the loyalists a chance at actually fighting back

or

Lucius. The guy who was sent down to die by his Primarch and just turns Traitor "just 'cuz" and has no actual impact on the Dropsite Massacre?

 

We'll see him at some point down the Road Especially when the Legions start to get much more Chaosy. But in the Context of Book 1: Betrayal, him being a character didnt really make much sense from a Narrative perspective.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283021
Share on other sites

I would actually think they'd cover the events of Angels Exterminatus, considering it's the event that led to Fulgrim's ascension. Prior to BL's portrayal of Lucius, he was the consummate duelist, bar none. He was undefeated in combat until post-Heresy, which is where he developed his power. I'd say the problem isn't the character, the problem is BL authors. They've cheapened him to the point that he's just a guy you have some random Loyalist beat to show how awesome they are, he's been ruined. BL authors ruined Lucius. There. I said it.

 

So I would assume at one point you'll see Lucius in a campaign that would cover the events in AE. It would make sense because they would be able to expand upon Shattered Legions and two Traitor Legions at once.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283030
Share on other sites

Swapping WS would probably not work as intended as a Game Mechanic.

 

Consider:

 

Lucius WS 6 or 7 Maximum.

 

Angron WS 9

 

They somehow end up in Combat. EC Characters have to challenge. Angron accepts because Free VPs for MURDERLATING an upstart Peacock.

 

Lucius' Rule kicks in. Suddenly WS9 and Angron is WS7.

 

Table is flipped by the other player because of how nonsensical that is even if the To-Hit difference is marginal at best.

 

+++

 

You also have to consider the main reason why he doesnt have a rule set: Limiting Legions to 3 Characters.

 

Who would you rather see if you only had 2 Slots since 1 is auto-taken by the Primarch?

 

Eidolon, the Big bad of the IIIrd Legion.

Saul Tarvits, the guy who gives the loyalists a chance at actually fighting back

or

Lucius. The guy who was sent down to die by his Primarch and just turns Traitor "just 'cuz" and has no actual impact on the Dropsite Massacre?

 

We'll see him at some point down the Road Especially when the Legions start to get much more Chaosy. But in the Context of Book 1: Betrayal, him being a character didnt really make much sense from a Narrative perspective.

 

Lucius killed a whole wing of loyalists and allowed the traitors to overruns there defences during the betrayal thats a pretty big part man :P Na like i said above i didnt think book one was for him anyway, but the fact we've not seen him yet is abit grrrr, i mean the Word bearers have a ton of characters, yes that is to do with calth i know, but still, would be good seeing him, soon.

I would actually think they'd cover the events of Angels Exterminatus, considering it's the event that led to Fulgrim's ascension. Prior to BL's portrayal of Lucius, he was the consummate duelist, bar none. He was undefeated in combat until post-Heresy, which is where he developed his power. I'd say the problem isn't the character, the problem is BL authors. They've cheapened him to the point that he's just a guy you have some random Loyalist beat to show how awesome they are, he's been ruined. BL authors ruined Lucius. There. I said it.

 

So I would assume at one point you'll see Lucius in a campaign that would cover the events in AE. It would make sense because they would be able to expand upon Shattered Legions and two Traitor Legions at once.

 

I agree with you 10000% dude, they made him the "avatar" of 30k!!! They built him up then used him as a right of passage for any mary sue character they were trying to make look awesome, "no need to build a character, if they can beat someone with Lucius' rep they must be good"

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283038
Share on other sites

Vespasian. That's all I can really say on the matter. He IS the Emperor's Children, even more so than Fulgrim.

Yeah, I totally agree and he is my favourite HH character of any Legion, but unfortunately we're never going to get rules or a mini for him. RIP sweet prince :(

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283135
Share on other sites

 

 

Vespasian. That's all I can really say on the matter. He IS the Emperor's Children, even more so than Fulgrim.

Yeah, I totally agree and he is my favourite HH character of any Legion, but unfortunately we're never going to get rules or a mini for him. RIP sweet prince :(

RIP indeed. The heart and soul of the EC died with him, Demeter and Tarvitz. I often think of what the original HH trilogy would have been like if it were Vespasian that came across the distress beacon on Murder, and not Eidolon. I believe the Luna Wolves would have taken a liking to him. Eidolon is such a piece of :cuss.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/318455-lucius/#findComment-4283141
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.