Blindhamster Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Folks, if you check the warhammer 40k page on facebook I've asked a question about BA and the rule discrepancies, pretty close to the top so should be easy to find. In it they've replied and said the number of attacks on dreadnoughts is going to be addressed (yay) but suggest that's about the only real issue there. Anyone mind going and commenting on the response? Let's try and make it clear they're wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindhamster Posted April 11, 2016 Author Share Posted April 11, 2016 Link to the post https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1598325283821438&id=1575682476085719 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicodemus Doloroso Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 For people like me who live under a rock most of the time ... what is wrong the Dreadnought attacks in Codex: Blood Angels currently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkangilos Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 I think what they meant was that was the question raised the most. I am sure they are looking at more than that. For people like me who live under a rock most of the time ... what is wrong the Dreadnought attacks in Codex: Blood Angels currently? It is one less than Codex: Space Marines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phiasco Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Everyone reply, but be sure to be polite and not degrade to wish listing. One step at a time. I'd also suggest expressing appreciation for community communication and feedback to questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 For people like me who live under a rock most of the time ... what is wrong the Dreadnought attacks in Codex: Blood Angels currently? It is one less than Codex: Space Marines.Two less. Our Dreadnoughts have two attacks base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindhamster Posted April 12, 2016 Author Share Posted April 12, 2016 If everyone makes comments it just helps to show things. I've just added a further comment to reiterate appreciation for them taking the time to respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlangWhanger Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Oooh it sounds like they're actually serious about this FAQ! Can't wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicodemus Doloroso Posted April 12, 2016 Share Posted April 12, 2016 Two less. Our Dreadnoughts have two attacks base. Well, that will certainly be nice if they change that, then. I wonder if that means that DC Dreads are supposed to get a boost as well in attacks as well to still have one more base attack than regular dreads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverson Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 took me awhile to figure out how to do but put my post on there also, hopefully a little extra attention the thread may get may get games workshop to see how strongly we want our faq to bring us inline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SM1981 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 Two less. Our Dreadnoughts have two attacks base. Well, that will certainly be nice if they change that, then. I wonder if that means that DC Dreads are supposed to get a boost as well in attacks as well to still have one more base attack than regular dreads?I've just gone on to the thread and asked the question (after being very polite to them for all their hard work). Hopefully we get an answer to that too. Ohhh - GW actually listening to customers!!! I like the sound of that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindhamster Posted April 13, 2016 Author Share Posted April 13, 2016 If anyone hasn't added a comment to that thread please do so! Every little helps, please avoid wish listing beyond bringing units in line though, they've already stated an FAQ will only do so much as it won't be a full blown update or suppliment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildrcheese Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I guess the bringing in line won't include access to formations, such as any vehicle or the Libby conclave? EDC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindhamster Posted April 13, 2016 Author Share Posted April 13, 2016 I don't believe so, but considering when wolves got their last codex and suppliment vs when they got curse of the Wulfen, we hopefully are on a similar timescale and will get a similar update soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I guess the bringing in line won't include access to formations, such as any vehicle or the Libby conclave? EDC No - just numerical changes that are easy to FAQ. So hopefully with some luck we will have WS/BS4 scouts, A4 Dreads (5 for DC maybe, though I'd be happy with 4 as we get rage and an extra for two fists, talons seem like a good upgrade with 7 attacks!), potentially the points cost of terminators/ land speeders, tech marine stats etc. Then if we are REALLY lucky vehicle squadron rules perhaps, but that is a LOT of words for an FAQ (even though DA and Wolves got them I suppose...) Between the psychic powers, the fact we can just ally in a Libby conclave, besides the fact we have VEHICLE PSYKERS WITH ACCESS TO TECHNOMANCY WHO WILL HOPEFULLY BE FAQ'D TO HAVE 4A TOO we are in a pretty good place after this. Also - I'm going to keep saying it now, the Iron Hands Demi Company is pure money for us! The Core choice can be an Armoured Task Force e.g. a Tech Marine (better stats than ours) and three tanks. The Auxillary can be one of many, my personal fave being just a single Contemptor :D The command benefits for this are: Two Warlord Traits (if you are so inclined), 12" +1 FNP Bubble from the commander and machine spirit on all vehicles (+1BS if they had it already). Yep - for allied AV you get super tanks basically the same as our fast ones with the option to split fire. Plus the IH relics are amazing and with our Sanguinary priests and all the FNP buffs we have some AWESOME synergy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOTT_FRANCIS Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Hi guys, I have decided to create a Blood Angels force. I have most of the models I want, the Codex etc. I was just wondering, what errata are you guys using as I can't find one on the GW/FW website. I did a 3 page search to find any Errata threads and this one was the closest. Sorry to piggy back someone elses thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 There are no current erratas for anything related to Faction: Blood Angels at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOTT_FRANCIS Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Thank you for the quick response. I shall peruse you r threads to learn what I can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Thank you for the quick response. I shall peruse you r threads to learn what I can. At the end of the day, I'm just some bloke on the internet. Best keep that in mind whilst reading them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Thank you for the quick response. I shall peruse you r threads to learn what I can. At the end of the day, I'm just some bloke on the internet. Best keep that in mind whilst reading them Ignore him. HE IS OUR GLORIOUS RECLISIARCH AND HE SHALL GUIDE US INTO BATTLE AGAINST THE ALIEN, MUTANT & HERETIC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHelion Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 It's true that Jol is just some bloke on the internet with some ideas. But he definitely seems to have his head screwed on right well, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian_F_H Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Hi guys, I have decided to create a Blood Angels force. I have most of the models I want, the Codex etc. I was just wondering, what errata are you guys using as I can't find one on the GW/FW website. I did a 3 page search to find any Errata threads and this one was the closest. Sorry to piggy back someone elses thread. Please note that if your oponent doesn't mind there is a reasonable fan errata on this board somewhere. Probably in the home brew section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOTT_FRANCIS Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 I seen reference to this famed BA Errata, I shall print it off and read it at home, my boss might not like me spending too long on my hobby, he is of the opinion that I "geek" too much in work time anyway. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paikis Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 I "geek" too much in work time anyway. LOL Sounds like HERESY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOTT_FRANCIS Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Oh, I freely admit to being a "geek". I have books, DVDs, comics, CDs, 4 armies. I am a fully fledged 40Kaholic and I need a regular fix of new plastic, resin, finecast or paper. It matters not which. The only Heresy is my Necrons army. My GK, BA and IK don't like it. Oh and a couple of Chaos books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.