Jump to content

How the BA Blade of Perdition works according to FW


m0nolith

Recommended Posts

Penddraig asked some questions to the FW folks during the recent Weekender, and had one regarding the Blade of Perdition.

 

This is just a copy and paste from him regarding the BoP from Heresy30k, so all credit goes to him.

 

 

6. Perdition Blade. If a 1 wound model fails it's save, are two models removed or just one? If other words, do the two wounds pass onto the unit or only against multi-wound models? The Perdition Blade only works against multi-wound models. The double wound does not get passed onto other single wound models. 

 

 

Cont in another post.

Not the way Alan explained it. He explained that for each successful wound roll, the model makes a save. If the save is failed then the resulting caused wound is doubled so would instantly kill any model with two wounds (Justearin, Fire Drakes etc), if a model has one wound then it is removed but there is no further effect, if a model has three or more wounds then it loses the appropriate number depending on the number of failed saves.

I read it as when you roll to wound against a unit, you double the wound pool, and the unit takes saves normally? So if you cause 2 wounds to a unit, they take 4 saves.

As did I, but apparently thats wrong according to what Alan Bligh.

Well, to me, thats fine. Because now BA Praetors still have a reason to take Lightsaber Photonic Blade when possible.

"When Possible" is the key word there.

Iv yet to come across a HH game that they use relics from that book.

On the other hand when you're up against a 40k army, it makes sense to use it against an opponent then.

If they have the right to use relics from their 40k codex, then why shouldn't you?

 

Allright, Im going to email FW about clarifying this.

 

You do realise that the vast majority of people will take Alan Bligh's word over an email response from Forge World front of house right?

 

Penndraig has been consistently reliable when it comes to whats coming up, but it is written pretty clearly;

"Every wound caused by this weapon is doubled to two wounds. Roll to save against each wound separately."
 
If it is was the way that Alan said, then why did they specifically write "Roll to save against each wound separately."
I can see it having to stay on the same model, but not rolling once for two wounds otherwise it wouldn't have said that.
 
Somethings fishy.

Roll to save for each as a balancing mechanic? It means you have the potential for double wounds, rather than a guarantee.

It removes a bit of certainty and makes both the owner and the opponent think.

 

And it's still a rather cheap AP2 weapon at initiative, master-crafted, with the benefits of LA: BA that has extra wounded capabilities.

RAW it says that though, if there is any different meaning then I'm sure it shall be FAQd at some point.

Conversations with Bligh could be anything tbh, I play another BA player, and would look an a hole if I said 'but it's not supposed to work like that,someone on the internet said someone else on the Internet told him that Bligh told him the rule works differently.

 

It mentions nothing of the wound restrictions at all in the wording?

 

This isn't an offensive post at all but you see my point there?

I still not sure what you mean

 

"Every wound caused by this weapon is doubled to two wounds. Roll to save against each wound separately"

 

Seems pretty straight forward to me. Says nothing about wound allocation to models.

When you attack a unit, If a guy causes 3 wounds (it doubles to six) , thats 6 saves. If 6 are failed, 6 wounds are allocated accordingly.

Am I missing something here?

  • 2 weeks later...

Tbh if it works the way Alan supposedly says, it's never getting used on a BA Praetor again as it's only real edge was that it meant a BA praetor could avoid being tarpitted.

 

Until there is an official FAQ I sure as he'll wouldn't change to the badly worded explanation above.

Well FW got back to me and they said they will forward it to their design team,

ie, they dont know yet.

My guess is that it will be in the next FAQ

They are not allowed to say anything, except to tell you they aren't allowed to say anything

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.