Jump to content

Gal Vorbak in Caestus Assault Ram


Dhar'Neth

Recommended Posts

Basically, all the Misericord rule says is that models in Terminator Armour (of any sort) do not have the Bulky Special Rule in this Transport - So you can put 10 Terminators in there instead of the usual 5 in a capacity 10 transport.

 

As this loss of the Bulky rule only applies to Terminators, Gal Vorbak and Lorgar are unaffected.

So, to answer the question, 5 Gal Vorbak in it as they still count as 2 models each.

Equally, Lorgar has the Bulky Special Rule, and doesn't lose it as he isn't in Terminator Armour, so he also takes up 2 slots.

 

Meaning that you can't have Gal Vorbak and Lorgar together in there as the minimum Gal Vorbak squad size is 5 which is max capacity before Lorgar is added.

You could however fit Lorgar and 8 models in Terminstor Armour in there.

Pretty sure that the model actually has a specific restriction on the transport capacity in the Misericord rule, being it can only transport models in Power Armour, Artificer Armour and Terminator armour, numbering 10, ignoring bulky. Models NOT in those types of armour cannot be transported. I dont know the Gal Vorbak unit entry, but unless they have either of the three armour types, they cannot be transported in the Ram.

Well Gal Vorbak have power armor, so technically they can still be transported by the Caetus. However, only terminators get to ignore the bulky special rule, so gal vorbak are out of luck there. Also Logar doesn't have power or terminator armor so he can't be transported in a Caetus. 

It's all done to raw and how harsh people want to be with it as it's clearly outdated now. in most friendly games just ask before hand and have a backup plan.

We always play it as 10 of unit inc primarchs, it's just simpler and fairer that way and no one gets stuffed by old badly written rules.

I always imagined that it was designed to mount/harness all types of marine armor in 10 predesigned harnesses at set intervals and then a ramp; as opposed to a rhino which is a box where you can fit as much as you can fit volumetrically.

I always imagined that it was designed to mount/harness all types of marine armor in 10 predesigned harnesses at set intervals and then a ramp; as opposed to a rhino which is a box where you can fit as much as you can fit volumetrically.

 

Pretty much this.

 

Hilariously though because Horus and Perturabo are technically in "Terminator Armour" as per the FAQ they can count as a single point of capacity inside one :P

  • 2 weeks later...

Well Gal Vorbak have power armor, so technically they can still be transported by the Caetus. However, only terminators get to ignore the bulky special rule, so gal vorbak are out of luck there. Also Logar doesn't have power or terminator armor so he can't be transported in a Caetus. 

 

He has artificer armour, so he can be transported.

He still counts as bulky unfortunately. The rule

Is worded as follows "the caestus has a transport capacity of 10 models, but may only transport models in power armour, artificer armour or terminator armour (the latter of which do not count as having the bulky rule in this specific instance)." By raw this technically means cataphractii and Tartaros can't be transported in blocks of 10 either, which is silly. In saying that in a friendly game I don't see too many people objecting to it.

why cant they be transported in blocks of ten?

Technically because they are no longer in terminator armour, they are in Tartaros or cataphractii terminator armour, where the rules only specifies terminator which is its one seperate ruleset to the other two. Personally I have no issue disregarding the oversite by FW but people in my local area sure as hell do have a problem with it...

He said technically. As in technically, Terminator armour is a different piece of wargear from cataphractii; is a different piece of wargear from tartaros. As in technically, Termincator squads have to choose between Terminator armour, Tartaros Terminator Armour and Cataphractii Terminator Armour. 

 

Is there a correlation between moral indignation and stigmatizing vs. lack of reading the rules carefully? It seems like it.

  • 3 weeks later...

It's more to do with having overarching principles (general goals of morality Vs precise law (specifics of morality) One is flexible, the other is not.

 

And that usually corrolates to how serious you take a game of toy soldiers.

It's more to do with one side reads the rules and knows the issues that need to be addressed vs. the side that gets offended that people even know about the problem.

 

On a side note "precise law" in no way equals "specifics of morality". Morality may overlap with law, but it should not be the basis of law. A highschool law course could outline as much

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.