Jump to content

Ragnar Blackmane by ADB


Roomsky

Recommended Posts

I'll toss in my hat by saying this has been my favorite bit of SW literature I've read yet. I agree with the others who said it felt like a tie-in with the previous works while also being it's own story.

 

The insight we got for the Flesh Tearers and Dark Angel's was great too, seeing how they handle their own situations in their own ways really helps show the indivuality each chapter really has.

 

I also really enjoyed the mental growth of Ragnar being explored.

In my mind, the DA are generally more disciplined and rule-bound...and wouldn't kill out of rage like a brash SW warrior

 

That could be my bias of course. Perhaps there's been a known history of DA dirty acts

Would they kill a Space Wolf out of spite, following a duel? No, probably not.

 

Would warriors of the Deathwing gun down Space Wolves in cold blood in order to preserve their Chapter's secrets? Absolutely. They'd regret it every second of the way, but they wouldn't hesitate for a moment. Frankly, the most unrealistic part of Sons of Fenris is that the Dark Angel kill-team didn't try to kill Ragnar and his friends again at the end of the novel.

Regret the killing or regret the secrets?  My sense is that the Dark Angels are fervent/puritanical to the extent they are because the shame of the betryal overshadows everything. (This may not be backed up in current canon/literature and based on when I read White Dwarf fluff as a teenager)

Haven't read past the prologue so can't comment on Ragnar too much.

 

In my mind, the DA are generally more disciplined and rule-bound...and wouldn't kill out of rage like a brash SW warrior

That could be my bias of course. Perhaps there's been a known history of DA dirty acts

 

Would they kill a Space Wolf out of spite, following a duel? No, probably not.

 

Would warriors of the Deathwing gun down Space Wolves in cold blood in order to preserve their Chapter's secrets? Absolutely. They'd regret it every second of the way, but they wouldn't hesitate for a moment. Frankly, the most unrealistic part of Sons of Fenris is that the Dark Angel kill-team didn't try to kill Ragnar and his friends again at the end of the novel.

Yeah...I'm sure the DA would choose protecting their secrets to sparing SW lives

 

As for what Ragnar does, I do think he does it out of rage rather than spite...though that might be a mimor distinction

 

The reality is he lost first blood and reflexively lashed out because he couldn't handle it

R_F_D,

 

I think the Dark Angels would regret the killing.

 

The Dark Angels who have been inducted in the mysteries of the Inner Circle are an interesting study of contradictions in character. With a few notable exceptions, they conduct themselves in a manner befitting warriors of the Adeptus Astartes, whose legacy is that of an honorable knighthood. This is who they wish to be. Their loyalty is so absolute, however, that they will commit the direst deeds to protect the secrets and their cousins of the Unforgiven. This is who they truly are, but it is not something they celebrate.

I think Dark Angels are one of the few if only Astartes to even feel regret. All other chapters can say they have the writ of the Emperor to do absolutely anything in order to protect His Imperium (true or not). All of the otherwise abhorrent acts they commit in order to protect their secrets, are not the Emperor's will but bred from their own urge to make up for their betrayal. It'd be the perfect grimdark IMO for the last Unforgiven to repent and the remaining Angels look back over the millennia of misdeeds done to cover up and finally realize, the ends did not justify the means.

R_F_D,

 

I think the Dark Angels would regret the killing.

 

The Dark Angels who have been inducted in the mysteries of the Inner Circle are an interesting study of contradictions in character. With a few notable exceptions, they conduct themselves in a manner befitting warriors of the Adeptus Astartes, whose legacy is that of an honorable knighthood. This is who they wish to be. Their loyalty is so absolute, however, that they will commit the direst deeds to protect the secrets and their cousins of the Unforgiven. This is who they truly are, but it is not something they celebrate.

 

Agreed, Belial and Azrael both found leaving a campaign a stain on their honour.

I think it's telling of the quality of Black Library representation of DA that Ragnar was one of my favourite DA books, which is a theme for ADB.

 

Sorael was representative of the characteristics of the chapter, we got some cool little snippets of DA culture (e.g. 30 hours to a Calibanite day) and despite the outcome of the duel, it didn't feel like faction fan service at all.

 

Essentially what I'm saying is I would trade my newborn son to have ADB write a full-length DA novel.

I'm with you completely b1soul. I would have loved it if Sorael had of won, especially since I feel that SW have a tendency to come out on top too much in BL materials. That said I think the ending managed to be fitting for both characters and overall very satisfying.

 

What I meant was that these kind of duels can sometimes feel like faction/fan service and favour one side over the other. I was just saying I didn't really get that feeling in this book (or at least no more than you'd expect for the protagonists of a novel).

Well, many SW fans feel that recently BL has been deliberately trying to take the SW down a peg...of course, I don't agree ;)

yeah didn't laurie say that at times they try to address fan concerns or misconceptions when commissioning a story? it certainly seems like post pb sw stories sought some sort of balance. i wonder if "reflection cracked" was a similar reaction.

If it makes you feel better, Ragnar won the duel by luck/accident, not because he was the superior duelist, but I can see how that might be unsatisfying lol

Isn't that how most battles are won? A little good fortune goes a long way when battling someone of similar capabilites.

Well, many SW fans feel that recently BL has been deliberately trying to take the SW down a peg...of course, I don't agree msn-wink.gif

We also know you just love the Wolves and are in now way biased msn-wink.gifYou just said you wanted Ragnar to lose simply because you think DA's are better than wolves.

And if we want to get pedantic, my (and many other Wolves players) problems lie with the Heresy depiction of the Wolves, not their 40k portrayal (I'm quite happy with that part actually). If you wanna see DA's winning honour duals just look at every single one depicted in the Heresy novels.

I personally think it is one of the best books to ever be released for the Vlka Fenryka

 

 

When it comesto combat

 

"Lucky is good"

 

Is this book worth getting? I've just finished the ebook of the Russ Primarch book. I've read about 5 books over the last couple of weeks. I'm feeding the addiction!

 

 

Yes, I think this is worth getting.

If it makes you feel better, Ragnar won the duel by luck/accident, not because he was the superior duelist, but I can see how that might be unsatisfying lol

I think that probably qualifies as spoiler territory, but I guess the cat is out of the bag now.

 

I was saying that the result of the duel felt fitting for both characters because Sorael got to exemplify skill with the blade (a DA trait) and would have beaten Ragnar had Ragnar not been lucky (a Ragnar trait) and slipped on the ice. This way both parties can be happy with the result. The SW actually won, but only because he got lucky, and the DA was technically a better duellist, but he didn't win. The duel also came with significant character development for both of them: we see evidence that Sorael had dedicated himself to improving his skills and is given an opportunity to overcome DA stubbornness and Ragnar shows improved maturity and sense of fraternity from where he was at the start of the novel.

 

This is 'both sides won, both sides lost' approach is typical of ADB's work and is one of the reasons his work is so highly sought after in the fandom. Sure it doesn't always 'feel' balanced (see Emperor's Gift) but it's a damned sight better than most.

 

 

In my mind, the DA are generally more disciplined and rule-bound...and wouldn't kill out of rage like a brash SW warrior

That could be my bias of course. Perhaps there's been a known history of DA dirty acts

Would they kill a Space Wolf out of spite, following a duel? No, probably not.

 

Would warriors of the Deathwing gun down Space Wolves in cold blood in order to preserve their Chapter's secrets? Absolutely. They'd regret it every second of the way, but they wouldn't hesitate for a moment. Frankly, the most unrealistic part of Sons of Fenris is that the Dark Angel kill-team didn't try to kill Ragnar and his friends again at the end of the novel.

Yeah...I'm sure the DA would choose protecting their secrets to sparing SW lives

 

As for what Ragnar does, I do think he does it out of rage rather than spite...though that might be a mimor distinction

 

The reality is he lost first blood and reflexively lashed out because he couldn't handle it

 

Exactly as later mirrored by Wraight in 'Leman Russ: The Great Wolf'.  SW prides and total arrogance cost DA a hundred veterans. Instead of heartful 'sorry' the level of spite and venom in Russ words are beyond any 'brotherhood' range. Plus as DarkKnight said Ragnar won the duel by luck/accident, not because he was the superior duelist.

Anyway Ragnar is still the worst book from A D-B yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.