Jump to content

A question about Khorne daemon engines


Lord Kallozar

Recommended Posts

Fluff perspective yes, neither the word bearers or iron warriors have any issue using demon stuff. Khorne works especially for Iron Warriors as in editions past that was the only mark they could make use of.

 

Rules perspective yes, faction keywords AFAIK dont have to be the exact same from unit entry to unit entry but must share at least one to be a Battle forged army.

Imperial Armour 13 has an image of a Brass Scorpion in the colors of the Bleak Brotherhood, a warband that doesn't seem to be aligned with Khorne:

 

"Greater Brass Scorpion (...) Thought to have been summoned into the material realm by a cabal of Sorcerers, Dark Apostles and Warpsmiths of the renegade Bleak Brotherhood." - pg.110

Undivided is a concept that is meant represent the coming together of the various servants of Chaos, both Marked and Unmarked.

 

So even if your army was mostly Unmarked, it wouldn't be weird or random to suddenly have Marked daemon engines, warriors, etc. Even if it's only one Mark, like say Khorne Daemon engines.

 

That's the primary difference between Space Marines and Chaos Marines: where it would be weird for Loyalists to mix their forces without a good reason, the only reason CSM need is a whim. A charismatic leader, brutal warlord, oaths of honor and allegiance, common enemy, etc. Heck, if two leaders had dreams that they need to ally their warbands would be would be good enough.

 

In the case of your warband, maybe they decided brass scorpions are more effective than Maulerfiends. Or something else.

 

As for obtaining them, as suggested earlier, they could purchase them from a dark mechanicum force. They could also build them themselves. Maybe they found an old abandoned daemon forge that was overrun with rampant daemon engines. etc

 

The great thing about Chaos is that you can pick an idea and run with it and it can literally be as random as you found a daemon engine growing tree.

"The great thing about Chaos is that you can pick an idea and run with it and it can literally be as random as you found a daemon engine growing tree."

 

I'm really liking the idea of a daemon engine tree as a piece of terrain. Can anyone recommend a link to cool daemonworld terrain?

Back on topic, I would say especially with someone like Word Bearers, you can pick and choose at will what daemon engines you have, just as you would summon the whatever daemons you happen to like/own, it all comes down to the whims of the sorcerer/lord/whatever visions the dark apostle is following.

In thing to keep in mind, when GW finally releases a codex, unaligned legions might be getting restrictions similar to what we saw in Traitor's Hate. In fact, based on the units not allowed in Death Guard, And Thousand Sons armies, I would bet that will be the case.

 

That worries my Night Lords, but I can always run them as a former Night Lords Army.

It might not make sense to you but GW seemed to think it did with our very last book that defined the legions. AL, NL, and IW couldn't take marks and WB were restricted to units without prebought marks so there is quite recent precedent.
They do it in AOS a lot especially using faction keywords to restrict the choices to gain the faction benefits, troops etc so most likely they will do the sam in 40k once actual faction books start coming out so if you want legion rules etc you will have to stick with the restrictions just to get all the special rules, artefacts etc otherwise your army won't benefit from them

So what if you had a DIY undivided warband? What would happen then in terms of the legion keywords and using Khorne daemon engines?

The Lord of Skulls has the <LEGION> keyword, so you can give it to any Legion (other than DG and TS) you want, at this stage.

 

So if you have a DIY undivided warband called The Guys Who Like All Of Chaos, you could give that keyword* to a Lord of Skulls if you wanted.

 

* Funnily enough, I can't find anything that specifies what keywords can or can't be used, other than not being allowed to use "Fallen" as a keyword. I wonder what happens if you name your Legion something silly, like "Daemon" (to take advantage of anything that affects units with the Daemon keyword) or, worse, "Imperium" (to allow you to take anything from the Imperium in the same army)?

They do it in AOS a lot especially using faction keywords to restrict the choices to gain the faction benefits, troops etc so most likely they will do the sam in 40k once actual faction books start coming out so if you want legion rules etc you will have to stick with the restrictions just to get all the special rules, artefacts etc otherwise your army won't benefit from them

 

The thing is, the undivided legions aren't different factions, but rather subfactions.  flavors of the same units, in a way that the cult legions frequently just aren't.  Your choice of sigmarine chapter doesn't restrict you to particular units, for instance.

 

So what if you had a DIY undivided warband? What would happen then in terms of the legion keywords and using Khorne daemon engines?

The Lord of Skulls has the <LEGION> keyword, so you can give it to any Legion (other than DG and TS) you want, at this stage.

 

So if you have a DIY undivided warband called The Guys Who Like All Of Chaos, you could give that keyword* to a Lord of Skulls if you wanted.

 

* Funnily enough, I can't find anything that specifies what keywords can or can't be used, other than not being allowed to use "Fallen" as a keyword. I wonder what happens if you name your Legion something silly, like "Daemon" (to take advantage of anything that affects units with the Daemon keyword) or, worse, "Imperium" (to allow you to take anything from the Imperium in the same army)?

 

GW already said that the faction keywords don't work like that on Facebook and on Twitch they additionally said (because people keep asking) that it doesn't work because that unit would lack the other faction keywords.

So if you name your Possessed <Dark Angels> they would actually be <Chaos> <Heretic Astartes> <Dark Angels> and couldn't be played in the same army as <Imperium> <Adeptus Astartes> <Dark Angels>. Seems like faction keywords get added to each other instead of just "choosing" one to use.

 

 

They do it in AOS a lot especially using faction keywords to restrict the choices to gain the faction benefits, troops etc so most likely they will do the sam in 40k once actual faction books start coming out so if you want legion rules etc you will have to stick with the restrictions just to get all the special rules, artefacts etc otherwise your army won't benefit from them

 

The thing is, the undivided legions aren't different factions, but rather subfactions.  flavors of the same units, in a way that the cult legions frequently just aren't.  Your choice of sigmarine chapter doesn't restrict you to particular units, for instance.

 

They aren't yet. Who knows what GW might do if they decide to release a Night Lords Codex or Word Bearer Codex at some point in the future.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.