dark_elf Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Dark_Elf, I would consider joining Slaanesh. Noise Marines are excellent all-rounder infantry. Lots of fire power, speed and fierce in assault. They can camp objectives, take up firing positions and go toe-to-toe with pretty much anything and push a unit off an objective when they need to. Plus your characters can summon in daemonettes, which are one of the better daemon choices. Add in some bikes and raptors and you've got a very fun and effective army. I've also been thinking of Tzeentch. Their daemons aren't as good, but Rubrics and Scarab Occult Terminators are very resilient and their special rules and equipment make them act more like Plague Marines and Plague Terminators should. Khorne is pretty awesome too, of course. Basically, I love what the designers did with the Chaos list with the exception of what they did to the Death Guard. It's hard for me to believe that the design team that created the Traitor Legions Codex are the same people who wrote the Chaos Index. To demonstrate such a complete understanding of what the Death Guard army should really be, and then 6 months later release another book that tears their previous work to shreds by doing the exact opposite and to do so in such a way that's not reparable... It's so damned confusing. Slaanesh welcomes all in her / his embrace! However, I don't think Noise Marines are that good in CC but Demonettes are great summoned in to help plug holes. I cannot support your decision to go with Tzeentch, and certainly not Khorne... I can't comment on if the Design Team is the same, but as an unbiased Nurgle by stander I will say it looks to me like the Nurgle units are omitted because they are coming very soon. Yes it would've been better not to place restrictions for the current Nurgle but I honestly think DG Terminators will be a staple in the coming dex. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797109 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I understand the dissapointment completely. Current start out for 8th has very little to nothing to do with narrative logic. As to why Death Guard are so limited in their Keywords to the point of it being vague (e.g. why no Vindicator either?) shows that to some extend Games Workshop has still relatively rushed the way certain Keywords work out. Now the advantage we have now is that no worry is required at all in terms of narrative. You want some Berzerker Troops? All you have to do is change their <Legion> to Keyword World Eaters. In addition there is also actually nothing prefenting you from going half and half. With this I mean that you cherry pick the best Death Guard models and mix them with the best other models you like. As we speak I'm seriously considering picking Thyphus and Poxwalkers for Troop choices and Objective holders while my other models very likely will be more World Eaters, perhaps even Skulltakers (who are not World Eaters) if the group is okay with me using Zhufor. Current edition has no narrative and it's reflected in the rules who do not follow any narrative logic when it comes to army design. It does however mean we have all the options. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797144 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_elf Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I don't think it is a narrative issue but more the issue of lack of synergy with true Death Guard units as specified by the current dex. But I believe this is temporary. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797197 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Talk about a doom&gloom thread. And here I thought Death Guard are like other Nurgle guys happy fellas. :D Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797205 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguecaster Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Talk about a doom&gloom thread. And here I thought Death Guard are like other Nurgle guys happy fellas. :DDespair is the first step one takes before realising the futility of it before Embracing Nurgle's gifts to experience true joy and happiness by embracing his gifts :D Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797217 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Talk about a doom&gloom thread. And here I thought Death Guard are like other Nurgle guys happy fellas. Despair is the first step one takes before realising the futility of it before Embracing Nurgle's gifts to experience true joy and happiness by embracing his gifts Indeed. Even tho I prefer the short-lived but intense joy that comes with being a Slaaneshi. :D Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797219 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I don't think it is a narrative issue but more the issue of lack of synergy with true Death Guard units as specified by the current dex. But I believe this is temporary. Well the Synergy is available. You can change Keyword <Legion> to e.g. Maggot Lords and obtain the same synergy most Chaos armies have. Likewise there is also nothing stopping you then still to have <Mark of Chaos> changed to Nurgle. As a result I don't think there is any lack of synergy. Just a lot of narrative oddities. Same with a lot of Chaos pieces really. As certain logical restrictions do not apply while certain illogical restrictions do. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797234 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaisyDuke Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 There is a pic in the rule book showing the as yet unreleased death guard terminaters. Look to the bottom left of the picture showing the death guard army. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797265 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguecaster Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 PG14 you mean????? Nope that's a conversion which was from one of the White dwarfs ages ago, it's got a helm from the BlightKings set and trust me I've used those bits heaps of times I know that helm off by heart Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797272 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 There is a pic in the rule book showing the as yet unreleased death guard terminaters. Look to the bottom left of the picture showing the death guard army.Its very likely that the unit is not Chaos Terminators and a new future release with its own non-modular Datasheet. Another example that follows that same design is Lord Zhufor who also is not a World Eater based on Keywords. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797302 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_elf Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I don't think it is a narrative issue but more the issue of lack of synergy with true Death Guard units as specified by the current dex. But I believe this is temporary. Well the Synergy is available. You can change Keyword <Legion> to e.g. Maggot Lords and obtain the same synergy most Chaos armies have. Likewise there is also nothing stopping you then still to have <Mark of Chaos> changed to Nurgle. As a result I don't think there is any lack of synergy. Just a lot of narrative oddities. Same with a lot of Chaos pieces really. As certain logical restrictions do not apply while certain illogical restrictions do. I disagree. A Death Guard Chaos Lord cannot buff your Maggot Lords' Terminators. Likewise, your Maggot Lords Lord cannot buff Plague Marines. This lack of synergy is what I was referring to. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797311 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguecaster Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 That's because Zhurfor is not a World Eater . The FW Vraks book had him as a loyalist space marine (Storm Lords chapter) who was captured and tortured by the Skull Takers ( which themselves were once a loyalist chapter known as the Beserkers of Kharadon ) eventually turning to worship of Khorne. Apart from being Khorne worshippers bothe the Skulltakers and Zhurfor have nothing to do with the World Eaters at all which is why he doesn't have it Dark_elf I agree especially when you take into account the mutiple Death Guard characters and psychic powers which only work on deathguard models Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797312 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Malnatt Evilborn Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Have faith DG Terminators arrive with Mortarion, take and read the latest White Dwarf where talks about the Lord of Contagion, well, there explains is a former Deathshroud Terminator, the bodyguard of Mortarion If 1+1=2............................ GW loves Nurgle, with Khorne, he always been treated better than the other gods, there are no reason to think no termy for DG Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797354 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 The Terminator was shown in the official GW trailer back in what? March? Along with Plague Marines from an upcoming multi-part kit. There will be Terminators. There will be multi-part Plague Marines. There will be Mortarion and Typhus and maybe even a tank, also shown in the background of that trailer that came out months ago and everyone has already seen all of this. The index is not permanent, it's to hold us over until proper codices come out, and considering Death Guard are featured in the start box they'll most likely be the second official codex to release (obviously after Primaris), thus alleviating all the issues that we are currently facing. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797359 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I don't think it is a narrative issue but more the issue of lack of synergy with true Death Guard units as specified by the current dex. But I believe this is temporary. Well the Synergy is available. You can change Keyword <Legion> to e.g. Maggot Lords and obtain the same synergy most Chaos armies have. Likewise there is also nothing stopping you then still to have <Mark of Chaos> changed to Nurgle. As a result I don't think there is any lack of synergy. Just a lot of narrative oddities. Same with a lot of Chaos pieces really. As certain logical restrictions do not apply while certain illogical restrictions do. I disagree. A Death Guard Chaos Lord cannot buff your Maggot Lords' Terminators. Likewise, your Maggot Lords Lord cannot buff Plague Marines. This lack of synergy is what I was referring to. This is true but this isn't an example lack of synergy, it's an example of restricted synergy. The difference ingame is often a non-issue. As models that will be within 6" of your Maggot Lord Keyworded model will not be within 6" of your Death Guard Keyworded model. I agree with you that it would be more fun and make more sence if all models with Keyword Nurgle could obtain Keyword Death Guard but for whatever reason GW decided against that. That's because Zhurfor is not a World Eater . Strange name to sell your model under then: World Eaters Terminator Lord Zhufor https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-NO/Khorne-World-Eaters-Terminator-Lord-Zhufor Skulltakers: Originally known as the Berserkers of Kharadon, a loyalist Space Marine chapter, they now bear the livery of the World Eaters traitor legion. http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/4b/4b29a5ad6929e348b71a6ff56702d4901042e1d8be40c4d87ab40f54a607e1d2.jpg Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797360 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguecaster Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 They clearly forgot their own damn fluff as all the Vraks books which is where he makes his first appearance has him as a Skulltaker not a World Eater it's just shoddy writing like most of their stuff as they also have Necrosisis as part of the tainted when he is actually from the apostles of Contagion Yeah that's literally what the were called before they turned someone at FW must of thought it was hilarious :D Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797367 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 They clearly forgot their own damn fluff as all the Vraks books which is where he makes his first appearance has him as a Skulltaker not a World Eater it's just shoddy writing like most of their stuff as they also have Necrosisis as part of the tainted when he is actually from the apostles of Contagion Or just maby he's from the Brass Mouth Eats Strange Apples Legion? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797370 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I wouldn't interpret too much into the FW Index. They are LOTS of mistakes. Compared to those, the GW Index looks like a masterpiece. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797375 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plaguecaster Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Hey I don't write Imperial Armour books that's why I said fluff wise he isn't a World Eater which explains it and that's what's clearly written in the Vraks books if you don't believe me then buy them yourself. Model wise it's FW fault This is really getting off topic Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797376 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Taylor Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I'm not disapointed at all! We've got some lovely models in the core set and GW have announced more are on the way - https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/06/25/new-primaris-space-marines-and-death-guard-announced/ Plus we know Mortarion is on his way and he will most likely have his bodyguard of Deathshroud Terminators with him. Plus looks like the new Plague Marine set will have loads of cool stuff in it, such as a Blight Launcher! So in short - I'm excited Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797386 Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark_elf Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I disagree. A Death Guard Chaos Lord cannot buff your Maggot Lords' Terminators. Likewise, your Maggot Lords Lord cannot buff Plague Marines. This lack of synergy is what I was referring to. This is true but this isn't an example lack of synergy, it's an example of restricted synergy.The difference ingame is often a non-issue. As models that will be within 6" of your Maggot Lord Keyworded model will not be within 6" of your Death Guard Keyworded model.I agree with you that it would be more fun and make more sence if all models with Keyword Nurgle could obtain Keyword Death Guard but for whatever reason GW decided against that. There is no synergy between Maggot Lords Lord and Plague Marines. Hence my 'lack of synergy' statement. You can call it restricted all you want, but my statement does not change. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797390 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar K. Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I'm not disapointed at all! We've got some lovely models in the core set and GW have announced more are on the way - https://www.warhammer-community.com/2017/06/25/new-primaris-space-marines-and-death-guard-announced/ Plus we know Mortarion is on his way and he will most likely have his bodyguard of Deathshroud Terminators with him. Plus looks like the new Plague Marine set will have loads of cool stuff in it, such as a Blight Launcher! So in short - I'm excited Absolutely, I think it's really cool to have these new datasheets appear aswell. The most likely representation of the upcomming Death Guard Terminators will also likely be different from that of the regular Chaos Terminators and I am also looking very forward for more differences and flavour to those specific legions to differentiate them. For example I too would love specific World Eater Terminators akin to that of the Red Butchers. Likely with Blood for the Bloodgod but without any option to thake a Combi-Weapon or things like the Reaper Autocannon. From that sliver of a spoiler we have seen of Mortarion I think his model will be awesome and his unique presence will also be really cool to make Death Guard a little bit less stagnant in melee. As without doubt I will believe he'd be a reaper like model :D I mean... This: Is going to be epic! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797404 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sternenfaust Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Back then when the 3ed dropped, we at first only had a shortened "codex-section" in the rulebook for each army. All of these were then updated with their own books. And Chaos later even got the 3.5 'Dex. Am I totally wrong in thinking, that the Index-books are nothing more than a "here is something for you to keep playing" and that they are totally not the final form? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797484 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Back then when the 3ed dropped, we at first only had a shortened "codex-section" in the rulebook for each army. All of these were then updated with their own books. And Chaos later even got the 3.5 'Dex. Am I totally wrong in thinking, that the Index-books are nothing more than a "here is something for you to keep playing" and that they are totally not the final form? You aren't. That's exactly what the Index is. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797486 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sternenfaust Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 You aren't. That's exactly what the Index is. So, I don't really get the anger. And concerning Havocs back in 3.5: They weren't even allowed to carry any heavy guns. "All" they could be equipped with were special weapons. They were basically 1 PM Champion with 4PM equipped with special weapons, if I recall right. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335605-death-guard-disappointment/page/2/#findComment-4797495 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.