That Guy Matt Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 I've always liked the Eagle Warriors. It's mostly just been the scheme but something makes them stand out for me, above similar looking chapters like the Marines Errant or Sons of Guilliman. Now having read Dark Imperium I'm preparing to step away from the sons of Corax and pledge my allegiance to Guilliman, so what better time to finally paint some Eagle Warriors? I've tried to look for what limited information their is on their background besides the same paragraph in the last four Space Marine codexes. I've looked in the obvious places, Lexicanum and 40k Wiki. The latter has a lot more but that worries me a little. I get the impression it is much less regulated then Lexicanum and much of it can be people passing their own fan fiction for chapters off as legit. So I'm wondering if anyone can confirm anything canon about their origins or history. Are there any hints of them in Horus Heresy novels or any orher publications besides the codex? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogWelder Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 They are space-combat specialists. The Ultramarine Legion had a comparatively small combat fleet consisting mainly of troop carriers like Battle Barges/Striker Cruisers and large numbers of escort craft. They did not have the huge numbers of battleships and cruisers that other Legions did. Therefore, much of the Ultramarine fleet was placed under the command of a few companies or a chapter. When the second founding occurred, these elements became their own successor chapter known as the Eagle Warriors. They were created from the part of the Ultramarine Legion that was most adept at commanding warships during void warfare. By contrast, the Marines Errant were created from the part of the Ultramarines that was most adept at boarding/counter boarding actions. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840876 Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathspectersgt7 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 What you seen in the 40k wiki is correct . They were a Successor Of the Marines Errant for many years but you know the latest fluff has been screwed with . Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840881 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogWelder Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 What you seen in the 40k wiki is correct . They were a Successor Of the Marines Errant for many years but you know the latest fluff has been screwed with . Personally I find the new fluff about them being void combat specialists more interesting tbh. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840884 Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathspectersgt7 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 What you seen in the 40k wiki is correct . They were a Successor Of the Marines Errant for many years but you know the latest fluff has been screwed with . Personally I find the new fluff about them being void combat specialists more interesting tbh. Ok . Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840885 Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Guy Matt Posted August 1, 2017 Author Share Posted August 1, 2017 (edited) Thanks. So are they definately Second Founding then? I seem to remember seeing them listed as such a long time ago but anything recent has said : 'Founded during a particularly dark period of anarchy,' While the aftermath of the Heresy would fit the description, it's strange that is would be phrased that way. What you seen in the 40k wiki is correct . They were a Successor Of the Marines Errant for many years but you know the latest fluff has been screwed with .I was under the impression the Marines Errant were successors to the Eagle Warriors, rather than the other way around. Edited August 1, 2017 by Asamodai Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840940 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugarlessllama Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 In one of the Flesh Tearers novellas they lost one of their companies early in their history to Fratricide via the Flesh Tearers in their attempt to hide evidence of the Black Rage. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4840973 Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathspectersgt7 Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 (edited) Thanks. So are they definately Second Founding then? I seem to remember seeing them listed as such a long time ago but anything recent has said : 'Founded during a particularly dark period of anarchy,' While the aftermath of the Heresy would fit the description, it's strange that is would be phrased that way. What you seen in the 40k wiki is correct . They were a Successor Of the Marines Errant for many years but you know the latest fluff has been screwed with .I was under the impression the Marines Errant were successors to the Eagle Warriors, rather than the other way around. My Bad !! Also here is a great looking Eagle Warriorhttp://www.bolterandchainsword.com/topic/335762-liber-magnus-lots-of-40k/ post #18 & 20 Edited August 1, 2017 by deathspectersgt7 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/337484-eagle-warriors-whats-canon/#findComment-4841076 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now