Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

A discussion on my local groups Facebook brought up fire frenzy and the hellforged units (contemptor, leviathon and deredeo).

 

I thought because (for whatever reason) the fire frenzy stratagem said helbrute not HELBRUTE that technically only hellbrutes could use it. Three people are arguing that it's a keyword even though it's not bolded (which I think is the intent) so the hellforged units can use it.

 

This is something I would love to be wrong on, double shooting soulburners sounds delightful, but am I correct in that RAW only hellbrutes can use it??

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/340557-hellforged-units-and-fire-frenzy/
Share on other sites

Only Helbrutes, not HELBRUTEs. without the bold it isn't a keyword, unless there is an FAQ that makes a change to it in the future.

That's what I thought, I asked the warhammer 40k Facebook team to see if we can get something official (again, I hope I'm wrong)

It's definitely not a keyword. GW writes words bold or not bold for a reason. That's why they changed Longstrikes special rule from Hammerhead to Hammerhead via Errata shortly after the Index release and why the Predator and Vindicator Stratagems use not-bold names as well.

But they have released two FAQs for DG and CSM both of which touched upon Helbrutes being actual Keywords for the traits yet haven't bothered with fire frenzy since obviously it's their intent that FW dreads can't use it, I really can't understand how people can still try argue it when it's clearly written

This is another issue with Keyword overlap. There should be a Helbrute(unit) keyword where ambiguity exists (or they should just change it to Dreadnought and make sure that keywords are exclusive).

Not really it works how it's intended to, you got certain stratagems that only affect a unit like helbrutes, cultists etc which aren't bolded so there is no issue then you have abilities that affect all types of units with the keyword like the legion traits etc. To be fair its just FWs fault (probably GWs as well ) since they didn't work together to ensure their units would share the same keywords from the start remember how they had to faq everything so it had the Helbrute keyword in order to benefit from the legion traits which didn't really take into account the FW stuff to begin with

 

Besides GW killed the concept of Dreadnoughts for chaos a while ago so there would be difference between loyalists and traitors it's only FW which stuck to the old names, had they just called them Helbrutes (like Contemptor Helbrute instead of Dreadnought) as well there would not of been any issue

 

Rather funny how this edition so many people don't read the rules properly and try insisting it works differently, look at that bull crap with people arguing that a a Leman Russ tank couldn't benefit from grinding advance if it didn't move :D

Edited by Plaguecaster

Yeah Kastellans are sick. Incredible amount of dakka and super durable. I'm glad the unit itself got nerfed a little bit with the Codex (no improved invul to reflect shots, shots get doubled instead of actually shooting twice so number of targets got halfed).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.