Arryn Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Made some tweaks to my initial list. Here is where I'm at. Playing a few people on Saturday. I'm worried it's a tad too assault heavy, but I do have a lot of threats on the board to hopefully split my opponents fire. I really like the idea of splitting up Dev Squads. Let's you double up on the Signum so I always have 2 Lascannons hitting on a 2+. Really not sold on the Warlord Trait, but I think Artisan of War or Visions of Sanguinus is where it's at. I do like the idea of a -3 Power Sword doing a flat 2 damage. Not sure on the Veritas Vitae, but I guess if I start with 6 Command Points I should make at least that one back. BATTALION HQ Warlord - Sanguinary Priest w/ Jump Pack, Power Sword, Bolt Pistol, Angel's Wing, Artisan of War Librarian w/ Jump Pack, Force Sword, Bolt Pistol, Veritas Vitae TROOPS 5 Tactical Marines w/ Lascannon, Storm Bolter 5 Scouts w/ Snipers 5 Scouts w/ Bolt Pistol, Combat Blade HEAVY 5 Devastators w/ 2 Lascannons, Heavy Bolter, Cherub 5 Devastators w/ 1 Lascannon, Heavy Bolter, Cherub VANGUARD HQ Mephiston ELITES 10 Vanguard Veterans w/ Jump Pack, 1 Relic Blade, 3 Storm Shields, 2 Power Swords, 7 Dual Chainswords 10 Death Company w/ Jump Pack, 1 Thunder Hammer, 1 Power Axe, Bolters, Chainswords Death Company Dreadnought w/ Blood Talons, Storm Bolter, Meltagun FAST ATTACK 5 Assault Marines w/ Jump Pack, 1 Power Axe, 1 Hand Flamer, Melta Bombs, 2 Meltaguns FLYER Stormraven w/ AssCans, Melta, Hurricane Bolters 2,000 Points - 6 Command Points (spent 1 pre-battle to have 2 Relics) Thoughts? Sorry mate just quickly, the Sang Priest - is this Index? I thought the JP Sang Priest wasn’t available in the dex? If so can he still have the codex options? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953345 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHarrower Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Sorry mate just quickly, the Sang Priest - is this Index? I thought the JP Sang Priest wasn’t available in the dex? If so can he still have the codex options? Nope. You can use options for a units gear from the Index. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953346 Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonExarch Posted December 7, 2017 Author Share Posted December 7, 2017 Are dakka inceptors worth it now to act as screen clearers for our assault elements? 135pts for a very mobile gun platform (on wings of fire) could be very worth it. Thrown Pommel 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953349 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont-Be-Haten Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Are dakka inceptors worth it now to act as screen clearers for our assault elements? 135pts for a very mobile gun platform (on wings of fire) could be very worth it. I believe so. There is so so much potential and multi-wound T5 that can hit with potential mortal wounds isn't terrible at all. Karhedron 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953351 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unseen Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) Are dakka inceptors worth it now to act as screen clearers for our assault elements? 135pts for a very mobile gun platform (on wings of fire) could be very worth it.When you compare them to company vets with packs and stormbolters, they seem pretty good.105 for 5 T4 3+ Wounds, firing 20 str 4 shots at 12" Compared to 135 for 6 T5 3+ wounds, firing 18 str 5 ap -1 shots at 18" The vets are significantly better in combat, with 15 attacks, compared to 6 with a small chance of a few mortal wounds, but I would say for fire support their definetely solidly priced now. Now if only their models weren't awful. Hmm... Wonder if their weapons would look alright being held by tartaros terminators with a personal teleporter backpack... Edited December 7, 2017 by The Unseen Chaplain Gunzhard and Remtek 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953352 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arryn Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Sorry mate just quickly, the Sang Priest - is this Index? I thought the JP Sang Priest wasn’t available in the dex? If so can he still have the codex options? Nope. You can use options for a units gear from the Index. Srsly wonder why they didn’t just include this in the dex... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953357 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHarrower Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) Sorry mate just quickly, the Sang Priest - is this Index? I thought the JP Sang Priest wasn’t available in the dex? If so can he still have the codex options? Nope. You can use options for a units gear from the Index. Srsly wonder why they didn’t just include this in the dex... It's their weird new philosophy of not putting options in the Dex if they don't make a model for it. I dunno, it's weird. I hope they'll address stuff like this in the future with some sort of book that allows you to modify or create your own units. Edited December 7, 2017 by TheHarrower Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953368 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Caerolion Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 It's back to the good old Chapterhouse lawsuit, it's GW's way of preventing third party sellers making parts for "sci-fi knights" that just so happen to heavily resemble Marines, etc. Basically, if a codex has an option or unit with no official model, third parties have free reign to make whatever they like for it, from memory. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953375 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 It's back to the good old Chapterhouse lawsuit, it's GW's way of preventing third party sellers making parts for "sci-fi knights" that just so happen to heavily resemble Marines, etc. Basically, if a codex has an option or unit with no official model, third parties have free reign to make whatever they like for it, from memory.Then they wouldn't allow the Index options tho.It's more likely that GW is slowly getting us used to Primaris and at the same time give us less reasons to invest heavily into regular marines so the outcry later on won't be as huge. They said they learned from AoS (especially the early time) after all. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953381 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzi Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 My current gut feeling is that chasing the turn 1 assault alpha strike deathblow isn't where we want to be looking and building lists around. I play several other armies, Guard included, and defending against turn one strikes is deployment 101. Scout units are always pushed out to move back enemy DS units. Chaff blocker squads stand on the front lines 4" in front of vital units and 4" away from other screens. Counter charge and counter punch units are on standby inside of transports to jump out and beat on aggressive enemies once they kill my unit or I back out of combat to. Don't get me wrong, the strategems are viable and dangerous, but I feel they are there to control enemy setup and punish blunders, not to build whole lists around...it's just too CP dependent. Example: opponents know we are deepstrike alpha capable so they will push out scout screens to block our DS units. This in turn puts those screen units in charge range of normally placed jumpers from our deployment zone. MSU Assault Squads, Bikers, or rapid firing Intercessors now have ideal position to clear the wrapping without wasting CP. This allows a single unit on turn two to make greater use and hit better targets from DS, using those strats, and other elements of our army should be in place by then to support. A bigger deemphasis on DSing will also make our auras more effective as well. Kallas, Zynk Kaladin, Thrown Pommel and 4 others 7 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953387 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) It's not like a list with a potential turn 1 charge is unable to do something else. Everything in a turn 1 charge list is useful even when not aiming for such a tactic. It's really more about playing the list than building the list in this case here imo. Edited December 7, 2017 by sfPanzer Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953398 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Caerolion Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 It's back to the good old Chapterhouse lawsuit, it's GW's way of preventing third party sellers making parts for "sci-fi knights" that just so happen to heavily resemble Marines, etc. Basically, if a codex has an option or unit with no official model, third parties have free reign to make whatever they like for it, from memory.Then they wouldn't allow the Index options tho.It's more likely that GW is slowly getting us used to Primaris and at the same time give us less reasons to invest heavily into regular marines so the outcry later on won't be as huge. They said they learned from AoS (especially the early time) after all. I guess it depends on the wording of the lawsuit results. Still, it's been the reason for why GW dramatically cut down on the number of special characters without models. I think it's mainly an ease-of-entry thing, though, so people can create all options possible for a given entry, without having to buy multiple boxes. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953407 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unseen Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 I think we're so CP starved, as much as its distastfull, I feel we can't over look a cheap IG (or Astra Militarum for any new bloods) battalion or even brigade. Marines, and especially marine hqs, aren't cheap. You can fill a battalion for under 200 pts, and I think a brigade for like 500 pts or some such ridiculously low number. Of course, purists are to be commended, but I can't see running double battalion with marines, mostly because the idea of running 6 troops and 4 hqs sound terrible. So either a battalion+vanguard will have to be enough CP, or I might reach out for some armed chapter serfs. Chaplain Gunzhard and Crimson Ghost IX 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953456 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 I don't even have enough points to take every BA unit I want in a 2k list, not to mention of having spare points to get some extra CP. :D But yeah I'd say that's definitely the way to go for competetive lists. It offers cheap chaff which Marines are lacking and lots of CP. I also don't think it's distastefull. It's actually pretty fluffy but maybe not something we want to play every single game (we are BA player and not Imperium player after all). Indefragable 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953466 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceril Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Considering soup, bringing fire base from another chapter. Some assassins, culexus to deny enemy psykers. Not sure if celestine is worth it anymore, she with some elite soup used to be my go to vanguard. BA vanguard detachment for melee units. 10man DC, some kind of librarian (normal/dread/mephy?). Vanguard with plasma dropping in. Maybe culexus as 3rd elite? Raven guard for the 6cp and firebase. Scouts as troops for denial. Need to calculate what it totals to, and see what other toys will fit. Waiting for codex/battlescribe. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953476 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Now that Dante is Warden of the Imperium Nihilus, I would say that Blood Angels leading an Imperial Soup army is actually quite fluffy. BAs have a history of fighting alongside other Imperial armies (Armageddons 2 and 3) and will be even more likely to do so now that Dante is in command of those armies rather than just fighting alongside them. Thrown Pommel and Chaplain Gunzhard 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953514 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 I really hope GW is going to give us some kind of human Baal soldiers in the future. I don't care if it's part of the BA Codex, the AM Codex or some standalone Codex even. I just want to see a Baal specific Guardsmen regiment. :D Grazcruzk and Silverson 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953520 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 From a purely CP standpoint, soup does seem desirable... I really hope GW is going to give us some kind of human Baal soldiers in the future. I don't care if it's part of the BA Codex, the AM Codex or some standalone Codex even. I just want to see a Baal specific Guardsmen regiment. Enough regimental tactics to make you're own! Karhedron and Chaplain Gunzhard 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953523 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 From a purely CP standpoint, soup does seem desirable... I really hope GW is going to give us some kind of human Baal soldiers in the future. I don't care if it's part of the BA Codex, the AM Codex or some standalone Codex even. I just want to see a Baal specific Guardsmen regiment. Enough regimental tactics to make you're own! Sure, but I want to see what GW would make it officially if it were to happen. ;) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953528 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Didn't Dante arm tens of thousands of Aspirants during the Devastation of Baal? That sounds like a good precedent for a Baal PDF to me. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953630 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Didn't Dante arm tens of thousands of Aspirants during the Devastation of Baal? That sounds like a good precedent for a Baal PDF to me. With the promise that everyone who survives gets a chance to become a Space Marine, so not really. :P I'm hoping on the fact that Guilliman told him to build up Baal and her moons properly so people can actually live there and Dantes new position. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953634 Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCE1981 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 This post has kinda exploded so I haven’t read through all of it. How “good” would a Librarian be as your Warlord? I would give him a Force Sword, the +1 damage trait, Quickening and Wing of Sanguinious powers, then the Jump Pack relic. He would Deep Strike with a Sanguinary guard escort, cast his powers get within 2” of his target, charge then use the 3d6 charge distance strategem on the Sanguinary guard. Karhedron 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953680 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 This post has kinda exploded so I haven’t read through all of it. How “good” would a Librarian be as your Warlord? I would give him a Force Sword, the +1 damage trait, Quickening and Wing of Sanguinious powers, then the Jump Pack relic. He would Deep Strike with a Sanguinary guard escort, cast his powers get within 2” of his target, charge then use the 3d6 charge distance strategem on the Sanguinary guard. Sounds pretty dang good...! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953687 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackcadian Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 What an excellent thread and how long we‘ve waited for it! That said I am quite disappointed that both new Codex batreps that I saw so far didn’t end so well for Blood Angels. Anyhow, as I am a sucker for Forgeworld I wonder what units would complement our forces well. I see the Chaplain Dread mentioned several times, but aren’t super impressed by it on paper. Generally I hear good things about the Scorpius, Rapier Carriages and the Sicaran, which would help with our firebase. Fireraptors are apparently pretty mean, as is a Leviathan. Anything I left out? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953696 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 How “good” would a Librarian be as your Warlord? I would give him a Force Sword, the +1 damage trait, Quickening and Wing of Sanguinious powers, then the Jump Pack relic. He would Deep Strike with a Sanguinary guard escort, cast his powers get within 2” of his target, charge then use the 3d6 charge distance strategem on the Sanguinary guard. Pretty good indeed. I would favour the Axe myself if there won't be a Sanguinary Priest around but apart from that, rock-on. While this would ensure your SG have their rerolls, I do wonder if running him solo (not as your warlord) would be better. He can DS and then use Wings to jump over screening units to attack rear support units. Used like this he becomes more of a mini guided-psychic missile. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/341919-competitive-ba-list-discussion-post-codex/page/10/#findComment-4953706 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now