Ichar Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 The way Drukhari get extra CP for different detachments is a great idea. So GW does have good ideas for this type of thing. I wish they would share that creativeness with the elite armies. Anyone agree? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 The Drukhari Codex is definitely the polar opposite to the GK codex in some regards. Where the GK Codex feels half-finished and like an afterthought the Drukhari Codex is just filled with creativity (and tbh with competetiveness as well). I hope the Drukhari Codex sets up a trend for more Codexes like that. It won't help GK right now but gives hope in the long run. At least we now know that GW CAN write something good like that. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5045833 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ichar Posted April 1, 2018 Author Share Posted April 1, 2018 Yeah that is what I was thinking. Creative, fun, fluffy, and seems to be competitive without being stupidly OP. At least so far :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5045841 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvus Fortis Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 Stratagem denial is broken against the armies that relies on them, like Chaos Marines, Death Guard or Custodes. Considering DE will have 7-10 CP easily from 3 patrols and warlord trait, 3 CP for such a powerful stratagem is fair price. The worst about this is that Craftworld brothers can have cheap DE patrol to gain access to it. As for special ways of CP generation, I guess, it was made this way because of 3 separate factions in 1. To have bonuses for Kabal, Cult or Coven, these must be separate detachments, so GW made and easy way for DE to take them all. I doubt, anyone gets anything similar (except Ynnari, maybe). Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5046038 Share on other sites More sharing options...
STTAB Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 It looks to me like the +4cp is a mono faction bonus. Hopefully we'll see similar for other factions. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5047849 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ichar Posted April 4, 2018 Author Share Posted April 4, 2018 Rather than punishing “soup”, find some way to reward mono-faction. That sounds like a great idea to me. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5047981 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Mytre Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 GK should just get double CP if they are playing just GK. As should Custards. Even at double, we'd still have less than what AM can. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048159 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevak Dal Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Another Phil Kelly army has great options and abilities? Fellas, I really, really miss Matt Ward. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048301 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danarc Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 I only hope that this isn't another way to make formations from 7th edition. GW already broke 40k with this kind of games. At the beginning formations didn't look like something OP or weird. than the armageddon happened. Another Phil Kelly army has great options and abilities?Fellas, I really, really miss Matt Ward. I strongly agree. I had this impression since 2016. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048322 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 Fellas, I really, really miss Matt Ward. As long as he isn't allowed to even look at the fluff I'm fine with him writing some rules. ^^ Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048331 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevak Dal Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 It never really bothered me that much, because none of the fluff was set in stone anyways, since it could all be propaganda and the like. I always saw the lore as a framework to make my own stories. I like the idea of Jedi/An'lashok/paladin marines going into situations where normal Astartes can't go-because it's too dangerous. Doomslayer Driago is really, really awesome. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048607 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted April 5, 2018 Share Posted April 5, 2018 The Draigo fluff written as is is the worst in the whole 40k universe imo, but lets not go there. That's way offtopic. ^^ Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/345811-great-idea-from-drukhari-codex/#findComment-5048610 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.