Berzul Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 So, cna you actually use this stratagem to fire of a power duing your opponent's physic phase? By the wording of the stratagem, I mean... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/346328-quick-question-on-empiric-channeling/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helycon Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 RUI, yes. On the other hand, it does have the word 'additional', meaning more than the one already done. It's very ambiguous. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/346328-quick-question-on-empiric-channeling/#findComment-5058589 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berzul Posted April 17, 2018 Author Share Posted April 17, 2018 I had a very... heated, discussion, with some friends over this. In favour of the use of the stratagem, is the fact that it says A psychic phase, not YOUR psychic phase. Also, that the wording for additional can be argued to be "In your opponent's psychic phase you are allowed 0 castings, so an additional one would put you at 1 casting", as nothing in the rulebook states, directly or indirectly, that you must have a minimum of 1 of something for an "additional" of that something to apply. Finally, the fact that there is no actual solution that negates this tactic in the book, or designer notes, that we could find. Against it are the fact that it seems to go against the spirit of the rules. Also, that you would indeed need to be able to do atleast 1 of X to get additional X. Finally, that there are stratagems that can be activated outside your turn, that directly state that they can be used in such a way, which would imply that the general rule of the game would be that you cannot do that, unless directly stated otherwise. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/346328-quick-question-on-empiric-channeling/#findComment-5058691 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.