Jump to content

Odd number of units and reserves


Recommended Posts

So in the rules, it says "You must deploy at least half of your army on the table." So only half can be in reserves. But....odd numbers?? If I have 21 units, would I be able to put 10 units in reserve, or 11? I need more specification on that to clarify. Thanks in advance!
Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/348970-odd-number-of-units-and-reserves/
Share on other sites

It would be even better wording if it was "half of your army rounding down" Because at least half of 21 is more than 10, but less than 11. And no rounding was mentioned. So you don't need to act like its the most obvious thing in the world.

Except it *is* the most obvious thing in the world. "At least half." If you have 21 units, 10 is less than half, 11 is slightly more than half. The wording is clear as day if you ever had maths in school.

Except it *is* the most obvious thing in the world. "At least half." If you have 21 units, 10 is less than half, 11 is slightly more than half. The wording is clear as day if you ever had maths in school.

Math? I think you meant English buddy. I don't think "maths" is a word either, so there is that. When someone is reading WORDING, not calculating MATH, things can get MISREAD. Lol.

 

Except it *is* the most obvious thing in the world. "At least half." If you have 21 units, 10 is less than half, 11 is slightly more than half. The wording is clear as day if you ever had maths in school.

Math? I think you meant English buddy. I don't think "maths" is a word either, so there is that. When someone is reading WORDING, not calculating MATH, things can get MISREAD. Lol.

Take the hostility down a notch. Whether it's English comprehension or understanding mathematics, it is a clear statement.

 

At least half.

Half of 21 is 10.5, so 10 is at least half and 11 is not.

It would be even better wording if it was "half of your army rounding down" Because at least half of 21 is more than 10, but less than 11. And no rounding was mentioned. So you don't need to act like its the most obvious thing in the world.

I believe it is obvious when you don't assume rounding where, as you say, none is mentioned.

 

It would be even better wording if it was "half of your army rounding down" Because at least half of 21 is more than 10, but less than 11. And no rounding was mentioned. So you don't need to act like its the most obvious thing in the world.

I believe it is obvious when you don't assume rounding where, as you say, none is mentioned.

Um, okay? I guess. Lol.

 

Except it *is* the most obvious thing in the world. "At least half." If you have 21 units, 10 is less than half, 11 is slightly more than half. The wording is clear as day if you ever had maths in school.

I don't think "maths" is a word either, so there is that.

 

Maths is the term in UK English, the short-hand for mathematics.

 

So now you've learned 2 things today.

 

 

Except it *is* the most obvious thing in the world. "At least half." If you have 21 units, 10 is less than half, 11 is slightly more than half. The wording is clear as day if you ever had maths in school.

 

I don't think "maths" is a word either, so there is that.

Maths is the term in UK English, the short-hand for mathematics.

 

So now you've learned 2 things today.

Alright, sorry for correcting you then. 2 different wordings, same thing. Not gonna act like my spelling is better or something. I feel this thread has gotten too hot, so I do apologize to all that have posted here. I suppose I feel like a moron for missing the wording, but its no excuse to get defensive. I hope to be better in the future in both regards. Have a good day guys.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.