Son of Sacrifice Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 I wonder about the real world cost of the impulsor. If it's £50+ they may not appear that much in the game. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5395973 Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeltaRange Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 The more and more I look at the Orbital Array the more I'm excited about it. Particularly as White Scars. I would probably not include more than 2 though. You can Advance and still use it. You can be in combat and still use it. (a place where my Impulsor will be quite often) Or you can Fall Back and still use it. It does not need LOS. It doesn't need a target besides just a point on the battlefield, so it CAN snipe characters It has no range. You can outflank the Impulsor and keep it alive for a guaranteed shooting phase with it. Mortal Wounds are more valuable than ever with the inclusion of things like the Ironstone, (or Wave Serpents) which will be (and are) very popular. It's part of a wide variety of ranged, non-psychic mortal wound abilities like Hunter-Slayer Missile, Flakk Missile, Hellfire Shells, etc. Combined with Tremor Shells+Suppression Fire, Blasting Gale, Tenebrous Curse, and the speed to get your units into the enemy lines Turn 1, it's very possible to keep your opponent hemmed up somewhere to rip him multiple times with this. I think overall, if I were only including Impulsors and no other vehicle (read: target of opponent's anti-tank) then I would put the shield dome on, but I do rate these very highly. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5396146 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemondish Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 The more and more I look at the Orbital Array the more I'm excited about it. Particularly as White Scars. I would probably not include more than 2 though. You can Advance and still use it. You can be in combat and still use it. (a place where my Impulsor will be quite often) Or you can Fall Back and still use it. It does not need LOS. It doesn't need a target besides just a point on the battlefield, so it CAN snipe characters It has no range. You can outflank the Impulsor and keep it alive for a guaranteed shooting phase with it. Mortal Wounds are more valuable than ever with the inclusion of things like the Ironstone, (or Wave Serpents) which will be (and are) very popular. It's part of a wide variety of ranged, non-psychic mortal wound abilities like Hunter-Slayer Missile, Flakk Missile, Hellfire Shells, etc. Combined with Tremor Shells+Suppression Fire, Blasting Gale, Tenebrous Curse, and the speed to get your units into the enemy lines Turn 1, it's very possible to keep your opponent hemmed up somewhere to rip him multiple times with this. I think overall, if I were only including Impulsors and no other vehicle (read: target of opponent's anti-tank) then I would put the shield dome on, but I do rate these very highly. Great breakdown - but I'd like to point out that the Impulsor doesn't care about falling back. It won't incur a penalty because it has Fly. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5396147 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 I think there is some value in "not having your eggs in one basket". Put you cheap Intercessors in Repulsors if you need to get them from A to B. Put your expensive Hellblasters in an Impulsor with a 4++ so they can screech forwards and leap out to roast something. Most armies can down a Marine Transport in a single phase without breaking a sweat so the key is to deny them obvious targets and ensure something with "bite" survives. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5399593 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galron Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 I am using them in my IH heavy force right now using rhinos as a sub in right now. Hellblasters seem like a good choice with a P.Captain. I have been using Intercessors with the assault bolters and they are ok for a quick surprise. I haven't had a lot of opportunity to try them out. So far I have only used the missile launcher version since I prefer consistent damage every turn as opposed to one slightly bigger shot once. I do like the list above and might have to give something similar a go. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5400248 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorin Helm-splitter Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I wonder about the real world cost of the impulsor. If it's £50+ they may not appear that much in the game. I think its cost is going to be a factor as well. I could see it in the same price range as the Admech transport and that would effect how common it is. Personally I prefer the repulsor ruleswise because I mainly run primaris and I want to take advantage of their range. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5401578 Share on other sites More sharing options...
painting.for.my.sanity Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 I wonder about the real world cost of the impulsor. If it's £50+ they may not appear that much in the game. I think its cost is going to be a factor as well. I could see it in the same price range as the Admech transport and that would effect how common it is. Personally I prefer the repulsor ruleswise because I mainly run primaris and I want to take advantage of their range. Given the AdMech transports are £45, I'd be surprised if the Impulsor ended up being that much. For all those of us (myself included) who are primarily in the hobby for modelling/painting, with gaming only a secondary thing, I'd just pick up another Repulsor over an Impulsor next time I feel like doing a tank - 10% would get you a whole lot more hobby time. I hope they're more in the range of Predator and Vindicator pricing, down at £37.50. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5401886 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 Well that's just subjective. Since I already have a Repulsor I'd definitely rather pick up an Impulsor if it's just for modeling purposes. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5401887 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vermintide Posted October 8, 2019 Share Posted October 8, 2019 I accidentally wrote a 2k primaris only brigade list with impulsors today: Space Marine brigade detachment, 2000 pts HQ Phobos Captain, cloak, carbine - 99 Phobos Captain, cloak, carbine - 99 Primaris Lieutnant, mastercrafted stalker bolt rifle - 70 STD 5x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 85 5x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 85 5x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 85 5x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 85 5x Intercessor, (stalker) bolt rifle - 85 5x Intercessor, (stalker) bolt rifle - 85 (dedicated transports) Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102 Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102 Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102 Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102 Elite 3x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 111 3x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 111 3x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 111 Fast Attack 3x Suppressors, Accelerator Autocannon - 84 3x Suppressors, Accelerator Autocannon - 84 3x Inceptors, assaultbolters - 109 Heavy Support 3x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 74 3x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 74 3x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 74 Tactic: sit everything on/near home objectives, block deepstrikers with phobos caps, use impulsors to drop intercessors on far objectives, harass enemy with suppressors & eliminators. I'd be inclined to go with iron hands for this list to move the impulsors without a to-hit modifier (also fnp). ... well, that is, if I didn't make any errors calculating points While it is quite TAC, it's lacking AT firepower. The usual battalion + Repulsor lists look stronger. When the new 'dex dropped I started experimenting with lists similar to this; in my opinion it'd be more effective/efficient to start with a battalion of Vanguards so you can deploy them up the board already with infiltrate rules and not need transports. Then you can man your impulsors/repulsors with the heavy hitters like hellblasters and aggressors, and deliver them more flexibly where they're needed. Probably gonna be deep into 9th or 10th edition before I have the models to try something like that out, though I wonder about the real world cost of the impulsor. If it's £50+ they may not appear that much in the game. I think its cost is going to be a factor as well. I could see it in the same price range as the Admech transport and that would effect how common it is. Personally I prefer the repulsor ruleswise because I mainly run primaris and I want to take advantage of their range. Given the AdMech transports are £45, I'd be surprised if the Impulsor ended up being that much. For all those of us (myself included) who are primarily in the hobby for modelling/painting, with gaming only a secondary thing, I'd just pick up another Repulsor over an Impulsor next time I feel like doing a tank - 10% would get you a whole lot more hobby time. I hope they're more in the range of Predator and Vindicator pricing, down at £37.50. I'd say it's also pretty sneaky how they've designed the variants with actual chassis differences too. You could run any of the humble Rhino variations without buying a separate kit by swapping out the turret/doors, but from what I've seen that's not as easy with the new hover tanks. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5403898 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos31 Posted October 15, 2019 Share Posted October 15, 2019 Size wise their close enough rhino & impulsor Using the impulsor to shuffle hellblasters or intercessors to objectives or to remove a certain unit seems the best use at the moment I accidentally wrote a 2k primaris only brigade list with impulsors today: Space Marine brigade detachment, 2000 pts HQPhobos Captain, cloak, carbine - 99Phobos Captain, cloak, carbine - 99Primaris Lieutnant, mastercrafted stalker bolt rifle - 70 STD5x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 855x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 855x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 855x Intercessor, bolt rifle - 855x Intercessor, (stalker) bolt rifle - 855x Intercessor, (stalker) bolt rifle - 85 (dedicated transports)Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102Impulsor, 2x stormbolter, ironhail-stubber, bellicatus-ML - 102 Elite3x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 1113x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 1113x Aggressors, Boltstormfists, Fragstormlauncher - 111 Fast Attack3x Suppressors, Accelerator Autocannon - 843x Suppressors, Accelerator Autocannon - 843x Inceptors, assaultbolters - 109 Heavy Support3x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 743x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 743x Eliminators, 2x bolt sniper, 1x carbine, cloaks - 74 Tactic:sit everything on/near home objectives, block deepstrikers with phobos caps, use impulsors to drop intercessors on far objectives, harass enemy with suppressors & eliminators. I'd be inclined to go with iron hands for this list to move the impulsors without a to-hit modifier (also fnp). ... well, that is, if I didn't make any errors calculating points While it is quite TAC, it's lacking AT firepower. The usual battalion + Repulsor lists look stronger.When the new 'dex dropped I started experimenting with lists similar to this; in my opinion it'd be more effective/efficient to start with a battalion of Vanguards so you can deploy them up the board already with infiltrate rules and not need transports. Then you can man your impulsors/repulsors with the heavy hitters like hellblasters and aggressors, and deliver them more flexibly where they're needed. Probably gonna be deep into 9th or 10th edition before I have the models to try something like that out, though :D I wonder about the real world cost of the impulsor. If it's £50+ they may not appear that much in the game.I think its cost is going to be a factor as well. I could see it in the same price range as the Admech transport and that would effect how common it is. Personally I prefer the repulsor ruleswise because I mainly run primaris and I want to take advantage of their range.Given the AdMech transports are £45, I'd be surprised if the Impulsor ended up being that much. For all those of us (myself included) who are primarily in the hobby for modelling/painting, with gaming only a secondary thing, I'd just pick up another Repulsor over an Impulsor next time I feel like doing a tank - 10% would get you a whole lot more hobby time.I hope they're more in the range of Predator and Vindicator pricing, down at £37.50.I'd say it's also pretty sneaky how they've designed the variants with actual chassis differences too. You could run any of the humble Rhino variations without buying a separate kit by swapping out the turret/doors, but from what I've seen that's not as easy with the new hover tanks.Swapping the turrets on the impulsor is fairly easy Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5408004 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandragola Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 I think I've seriously underrated the Impulsor. I might grab three when they come out. Not looking forward to building the tracks, but oh well. Here's the thing. An impulsor with stubber, AA stubbers and 2 storm bolters has 13/17 shots and costs 90 points. It's a fantastic screening unit, it has real dakka, it's tough for its cost and it can move your guys around. For IH it becomes a fast troop-hunter and for Fists it's a serious threat to flying vehicles (ie most of them in today's meta). In short it's not a new rhino, it's a new assault cannon razorback that flies and has a -2" charge thingy. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5409568 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkimaskMohawk Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 And it's priced like a heavy battle tank lol. I can see fist successors really leveraging it against any eldar or iron air. Considering that repulsors, speeders, wave serpents and all sorts of good units have fly, it's a pretty safe bet anyways. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5409600 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Corbin Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I think I've seriously underrated the Impulsor. I might grab three when they come out. Not looking forward to building the tracks, but oh well. Here's the thing. An impulsor with stubber, AA stubbers and 2 storm bolters has 13/17 shots and costs 90 points. It's a fantastic screening unit, it has real dakka, it's tough for its cost and it can move your guys around. For IH it becomes a fast troop-hunter and for Fists it's a serious threat to flying vehicles (ie most of them in today's meta). In short it's not a new rhino, it's a new assault cannon razorback that flies and has a -2" charge thingy. I am thinking the opposite direction for the Impulsor. Stock, with just a shield dome, an Apothecary embarked, and in reserve. The idea is counter deep strike, getting the targeted unit back in the fight, while the tank blocks some line of sight. The Apothecary can disembark during movement (assault vehicle), and he heals at the end of the movement phase. Thereafter, he either jumps back in and rides to his next call, or gives the guys a ride to a better location. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410055 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemondish Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I think I've seriously underrated the Impulsor. I might grab three when they come out. Not looking forward to building the tracks, but oh well. Here's the thing. An impulsor with stubber, AA stubbers and 2 storm bolters has 13/17 shots and costs 90 points. It's a fantastic screening unit, it has real dakka, it's tough for its cost and it can move your guys around. For IH it becomes a fast troop-hunter and for Fists it's a serious threat to flying vehicles (ie most of them in today's meta). In short it's not a new rhino, it's a new assault cannon razorback that flies and has a -2" charge thingy. I am thinking the opposite direction for the Impulsor. Stock, with just a shield dome, an Apothecary embarked, and in reserve. The idea is counter deep strike, getting the targeted unit back in the fight, while the tank blocks some line of sight. The Apothecary can disembark during movement (assault vehicle), and he heals at the end of the movement phase. Thereafter, he either jumps back in and rides to his next call, or gives the guys a ride to a better location. I do not even care if that sounds relatively weak (because the healing is relatively weak), I love the visuals. Ambulance Force is now a plan... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410093 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WickedJester1013 Posted October 18, 2019 Author Share Posted October 18, 2019 It’s a shame that the transport frame holds less than the tank frame lol. Which is silly if you think about it because the two tanks are similar sizes right? So they take off all the guns and ammo of the tank, and even remove part of the roof to make it opened top and some how that loses almost half its transport spaces? Gotta wonder what Cawl was thinking. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410111 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishagu Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 It’s a shame that the transport frame holds less than the tank frame lol. Which is silly if you think about it because the two tanks are similar sizes right? So they take off all the guns and ammo of the tank, and even remove part of the roof to make it opened top and some how that loses almost half its transport spaces? Gotta wonder what Cawl was thinking. Impulsor is much, much smaller. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410112 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Casman Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I think I've seriously underrated the Impulsor. I might grab three when they come out. Not looking forward to building the tracks, but oh well. Here's the thing. An impulsor with stubber, AA stubbers and 2 storm bolters has 13/17 shots and costs 90 points. It's a fantastic screening unit, it has real dakka, it's tough for its cost and it can move your guys around. For IH it becomes a fast troop-hunter and for Fists it's a serious threat to flying vehicles (ie most of them in today's meta). In short it's not a new rhino, it's a new assault cannon razorback that flies and has a -2" charge thingy. I am thinking the opposite direction for the Impulsor. Stock, with just a shield dome, an Apothecary embarked, and in reserve. The idea is counter deep strike, getting the targeted unit back in the fight, while the tank blocks some line of sight. The Apothecary can disembark during movement (assault vehicle), and he heals at the end of the movement phase. Thereafter, he either jumps back in and rides to his next call, or gives the guys a ride to a better location. I do not even care if that sounds relatively weak (because the healing is relatively weak), I love the visuals. Ambulance Force is now a plan... Yes, I love the idea behind this! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410126 Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuarterPounder Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I really want someone to paint an Impuslor up as an ambulance. That would be absolutely amazing. I probably couldn't being myself to shoot at it in games, on principle... Would that idea have any merit? Could you bring a pair of apothecaries, and/or maybe a strong melee character (Pri Chaplain w the relic of holy head hitting) or bodyguard unit of auto Intercessors (assuming a single apothecary) to help clear out the enemy problem? It might be nice even as an objective holder... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410190 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemondish Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I've managed to get two ambulances into a brigade I was planning. Who needs Invictors anyway lol Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410236 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Corbin Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 For paint, I figure white on the indentation on the front, under the driver's port, and that wraps around the sides, and white on the flat vertical panels on the sides of the rear thrusters. Apothecary helix in red painted on the white fields. Would look really good contrasting black, or dark blue Impulsors. To bring a squad along, why not Infiltrators with their own Helix Adept. Expensive, yes, and a waste of concealed positions, but you could drop another troop with ObSec on that backfield or midfield objective. Just saying. Thank you all for not ridiculing my idea. I appreciate that. Also, imagine the Impulsor if/when a Primaris Techmarine that is not in Gravis Armor is released. Wouldn't that pair nicely with Invictus Suits? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410294 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemondish Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 For paint, I figure white on the indentation on the front, under the driver's port, and that wraps around the sides, and white on the flat vertical panels on the sides of the rear thrusters. Apothecary helix in red painted on the white fields. Would look really good contrasting black, or dark blue Impulsors. To bring a squad along, why not Infiltrators with their own Helix Adept. Expensive, yes, and a waste of concealed positions, but you could drop another troop with ObSec on that backfield or midfield objective. Just saying. Thank you all for not ridiculing my idea. I appreciate that. Also, imagine the Impulsor if/when a Primaris Techmarine that is not in Gravis Armor is released. Wouldn't that pair nicely with Invictus Suits? It's a pretty interesting idea that I think is totally fun and cool, if 8th edition wasn't already so deadly from the very beginning of the game folks might play these quirky yet fun list concepts. Case in point, war com posted a cool phobos specific list that used 4 Impulsors just as small Infantry support vehicles. They didn't really suggest or imply they were there specifically to transport things turn 1. That definitely plays into your rapid response concept a bit too for mid game redeployment. That list looks fun and fluffy, but you'd likely never see it when you can have things like sneaky assault Centurions or Dorn's moving castle or the Iron Air Force. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410317 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLACK BLŒ FLY Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 I think with IF dropping soon we will see more infantry heavy lists in general. I’d love to use one Impulsor but have a concern now. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410321 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Corbin Posted October 18, 2019 Share Posted October 18, 2019 For paint, I figure white on the indentation on the front, under the driver's port, and that wraps around the sides, and white on the flat vertical panels on the sides of the rear thrusters. Apothecary helix in red painted on the white fields. Would look really good contrasting black, or dark blue Impulsors. To bring a squad along, why not Infiltrators with their own Helix Adept. Expensive, yes, and a waste of concealed positions, but you could drop another troop with ObSec on that backfield or midfield objective. Just saying. Thank you all for not ridiculing my idea. I appreciate that. Also, imagine the Impulsor if/when a Primaris Techmarine that is not in Gravis Armor is released. Wouldn't that pair nicely with Invictus Suits? It's a pretty interesting idea that I think is totally fun and cool, if 8th edition wasn't already so deadly from the very beginning of the game folks might play these quirky yet fun list concepts. Case in point, war com posted a cool phobos specific list that used 4 Impulsors just as small Infantry support vehicles. They didn't really suggest or imply they were there specifically to transport things turn 1. That definitely plays into your rapid response concept a bit too for mid game redeployment. That list looks fun and fluffy, but you'd likely never see it when you can have things like sneaky assault Centurions or Dorn's moving castle or the Iron Air Force. Yeah, I know. There are those of us, kinda beardy, established professionals. We have good, if not great, collections, and we never play an unpainted model. We know our armies, and our rules. The obvious cheese jumps out at us. How do you not win with a limburger list?! We don't see the point of playing a game that is a forgone conclusion. If a list is so broken that it crushes everybody at my game store, then what is the point of playing it?! Like I said, established professional, already winning at life. Nice place to live, in a nice area, nice cars to drive, gorgeous wife with a career of her own, somebody stop me... I just want to get out, have a fun game that could go either way, and discuss the lore and setting we all love. No need to club baby seals. No need to be a poor sport. I even keep the heckling of Tau players good-natured. I guess I am just too used to private 40K hobby clubs, having got tired of childish, wanna-be tournament players at some game stores. Anyways, I digress. Yes, rapid response can be quite the utility. The ambulance idea is unconventional to be sure. However, between Auspex Scan, and "Ambulance Force" if an opponent in your local meta wants to successfully deep strike to delete a unit, or two, then that opponent has to make sure they can weather the intercept fire, and for sure delete their target before dying. In game terms, sink more points into a unit that will not last more than two turns, or make them completely disposable. Now, let's say he has more than one option to deep strike into your deployment zone, and you can respond to any of them quickly on your turn. A savvy player, will try to make you choose one flank or the other, knowing that it will be late game by the time you reach the other side of the board, if you even get there, even with a 14" move. Also, keep in mind, that if you are playing long edge vs long edge, and "all" your ambulance is doing is healing, it may not be getting shot up all that much. Late game, make a bee line for deep in their deployment zone. How much fire will they throw at that Ambulance, with its 4++, to avoid giving up Linebreaker? Seriously, anybody else ever win a game by a single Victory Point? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410337 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos31 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 It’s a shame that the transport frame holds less than the tank frame lol. Which is silly if you think about it because the two tanks are similar sizes right? So they take off all the guns and ammo of the tank, and even remove part of the roof to make it opened top and some how that loses almost half its transport spaces? Gotta wonder what Cawl was thinking. Impulsor is much, much smaller. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410454 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos31 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/358542-repulsor-vs-impulsor/page/2/#findComment-5410472 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.