Lord_Caerolion Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Not to mention covered in skulls. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/360431-are-40k-flamers-more-destructive-than-modern-flamethrowers/page/2/#findComment-5443581 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wulf Vengis Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 That's how you KNOW it's outrageously more effective than normal modern counterparts. Getting mugged? No big deal. The muggers gun has a skull bolted onto it? You're already doomed. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/360431-are-40k-flamers-more-destructive-than-modern-flamethrowers/page/2/#findComment-5443817 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volt Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 (Correct me if I'm wrong) Modern flamethrowers eject a stream of ignited petroleum gel (i.e. napalm) 40K flamers eject a stream of ignited promethium gel (i.e. 40K "napalm") Does the latter burn hotter than the former? To be effective against enemy Space Marines, I'm guessing that has to be the case? Flamers can literally cremate people into ASH. Promethium makes IRL napalm jelly look like a fluffy bunny rabbit of incendiaries. I'd post pictures, but that'd get me banned, but to save you a google search napalm just makes people look like somebody forgot their chicken in the oven too long. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/360431-are-40k-flamers-more-destructive-than-modern-flamethrowers/page/2/#findComment-5445631 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 So, after all that's been posted, I guess the answer is a resounding yes. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/360431-are-40k-flamers-more-destructive-than-modern-flamethrowers/page/2/#findComment-5445775 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.