Karhedron Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 The inability to upgrade our beloved Wolf Priests to effective Apothecaries was one of the few disappointments of the new supplement. It also looked like the Primaris Apothecary was not eligible to upgraded to Chief Apothecary. Now it looks like that oversight has been fixed. https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/n2KFvj3bgo3Cr6V3.pdf The new update adds the following to the Primaris Apothecary: Page 145 – Primaris Apothecary Change this unit’s keywords line to read: ‘KEYWORDS: Infantry, Character, Primaris, Apothecary’ This means the Primaris Apothecary (which we do have access to) can be upgraded to Chief Apothecary. I don't know if we will want to on many occasions but at least we do have access to an efficient healer if we want. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squark Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 (edited) No, unfortunately, we don't. We can't take units with the Apothecary keyword. The same argument that made Primaris apothecaries ineligible to be Chief Apothecaries was the only reason we could (arguably) take them. And given that same argument also barred Primaris Apothecaries from using the Combat Restoratives Strategem (one of their biggest selling points), it was pretty clear this was an editing mistake. Whenever GW bolds something, they're talking about a keyword. (Edited for additional clarity and to avoid soundign to harsh). Edited November 9, 2020 by Squark Kallas 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629281 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted November 9, 2020 Author Share Posted November 9, 2020 Ah, on reflection I think you may be right. I saw the change and leapt to the opposite conclusion. Sorry for the false alarm brothers. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629293 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorin Helm-splitter Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 I think we all knew it was coming, and we got a ton of new units anyways. Little disappointed it didn't clear up if your opponent could use countercharge on a judiciar style ability. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629302 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar69 Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 I think we all knew it was coming, and we got a ton of new units anyways. Little disappointed it didn't clear up if your opponent could use countercharge on a judiciar style ability. It is already clear. Fight last units are not eligible until all others have fought. The interrupt strategum can only be used on eligible units. Kallas and TiguriusX 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629418 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorin Helm-splitter Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 Goon hammer has a rules hammer article (october 1st) where they go through it. GW defines an eligible unit basically as one that charged or is in engagement range. It doesn't mention fight last effects so their argument is that if the interrupt strat let's you ignore the rule where you can't select a unit until all charging units have gone it should also allow you to ignore the fights last wording as well. I think they're right I just don't know if that's the intention. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629445 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiguriusX Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 Goon hammer has a rules hammer article (october 1st) where they go through it. GW defines an eligible unit basically as one that charged or is in engagement range. It doesn't mention fight last effects so their argument is that if the interrupt strat let's you ignore the rule where you can't select a unit until all charging units have gone it should also allow you to ignore the fights last wording as well. I think they're right I just don't know if that's the intention. Goonhammer is 100% wrong or you misinterpreted their article The stratagem requires an eligible unit The judiciar ability expressly makes the target ineligible until all others have fought It is one of GWs best rule writings in recent history because it is 100% unambiguous svane jotunsbane and Kallas 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629449 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Shepherd Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 They faq'late 8th ed armour of russ to allow interrupts but it has been changed back to not allow it Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629454 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnar69 Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 Yes, goonhammer was right when they posted it, but now it's wrong because the wording of the fight last abilities has changed. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629473 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorin Helm-splitter Posted November 9, 2020 Share Posted November 9, 2020 Ok I see now I haven't used the judiciar yet because I don't own one. Thanks. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629535 Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIth Posted November 10, 2020 Share Posted November 10, 2020 I’m pretty sure the Goonhammer article explicitly says/shows that, unless they have an “always fight first” ability, both the Armor of Russ and the Judiciar shift them to the final/end pool of units eligible to fight. So they can only interrupt once that pool of eligible units to fight is up. Dark Shepherd 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5629756 Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatBrannigan Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Even with an ‘always fight first’ ability, the Judiciar and Armour of Russ make units simply not eligible to fight until everyone else has done so. They go to the bottom of the pile, although could then fight first out of the other units that were made not eligible. Very nasty. Kallas and Dark Shepherd 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5630548 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havok13 Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 (edited) There's a section in the back of the rule book that talks about the fight first last rule. I think its called rare rules. Edited November 14, 2020 by Havok13 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5631241 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Shepherd Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Rare rules more of covers always fights first The fights last thing is more just covered by the wording in strats and abilities and fight order namely 'eligible' Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/367539-i-think-we-can-now-take-master-apothecary/#findComment-5631244 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now