Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It doesn't really track 100%

 

Blood Angels and World Eaters

Blood Angels and Emperor's Children

Ultramarines and Word Bearers

Ultramarines and Sons of Horus

Raven Guard and Alpha Legion

Raven Guard and Night Lords

Salamanders and Death Guard

Iron Hands and Death Guard

Salamanders and Iron Warriors

Iron Hands and Iron Warriors

 

Could all lay claim to being the light and dark side of the same coin. 

Yeah I think some have opposite numbers and/or particular grudges against opposite legions but it’s not universal.

 

Each Legion generally embodies a certain aspect of war so it’s natural that some of them work as opposites (siege craft versus fortification for example) but not all of those aspects has a counterpoint.

Grudges/Rivalry/Outright Hatred but not always reciprocated. 

 

Word Bearers vs Ultramarines (traitor heavy)

Dark Angels vs Night Lords (?)

Imperial Fists vs Iron Warriors (traitor heavy)

Space Wolves vs Thousand Sons (loyalist heavy)

White Scars vs Death Guard (loyalist heavy)

Iron Hands vs Emperor's Children (loyalist heavy)

 

I don't think Salamanders, Raven Guard, World Eaters, Blood Angels, Sons of Horus or Alpha Legion particularly had any overt rival.

I think Corax hated Curze, and Vulkan certainly had cause to hate Curze but not sure if he actually did. Lorgar is pretty much universally reviled even by his own, Sanguinius pretty much universally loved even by his enemies. 

Blood Angels have Black Legion as their rival faction, at least in the 8th ed rules.

 

Yeah, but I dont believe that animosity was during the HH, until the literal very end.

 

I'd go with.

 

Night Lords vs Raven Guard

Ultramarines vs Word Bearers

Dark Angels vs Alpha Legion

Wolves vs Thousand Sons

Imperial Fists vs Iron Warriors

Scars vs Death Guard

Iron Hands vs Emperors Children

Angels vs World Eaters

Salamanders vs Sons of Horus (???)

 

Admittedly, its not a great process, and doesnt track well if we are being honest.

there is never a 100 percent match. But each legion / chapter have something from another "counterpart"

 

for example:

 

Black Templars have in common:

 

- Word Bearers: because of the faith

- World Eaters : because of their aggression, the devotion chains, honor in close combat (in earlier editons they had much more in common like BT were not allowed to field Devastors and Whirlwinds

- Black Legion: First Captain abbdaddon and Sigismund are the true heirs of the Horus Heresy, both stand for the new age of Imperium. Both are crusaders in black.

 

 

Raven Guard:

 

- Alpha Legion ( stealthy warfare)

- Night lords ( jump pack, claws,...)

 

Imperial Fists:

 

- Iron Warriors ( warfare, siege,...)

- Emperors children (duelists, proud)

 

 

Or was it more about who is their arch-enemy???

 

Emperor’s Children - Space Wolves

World Eaters - Salamanders

Iron Warriors - Ravenguard

Not one of those makes any sense to me whatsoever.

 

I think he meant the exact opposite:

 

WE ( Life has no matter when blood flowes vs life is the most important thing)

Iron Warriors is open warfare, siege, directly.... vs stealth, ninjastyle....

 

but this is what I said before. Counterpart for what? I thought the same fighting style just on the other side .... ( Imperial Fists are loyal Iron Warriors; and so on)

Or even just the rivalry in the lore.?

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

 

If it’s just because they both liked melee, the same is true of plenty of others.

 

Blood angels didn’t have the anger management issues till after the heresy, they did have the thirst but that was not all that common and is very different anyway.

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

 

If it’s just because they both liked melee, the same is true of plenty of others.

 

Blood angels didn’t have the anger management issues till after the heresy, they did have the thirst but that was not all that common and is very different anyway.

Blood

Rip and tear

Relation with Khorne, Ka-Bandha etc

Angel v Angel

 

Not the most far-out comparison.

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

I think it goes back to the fact that they had almost identical rules in 3rd edition and some fans have looooong memories. :wink:

 

Malcador mentions in one of the HH novels that there was a certain amount of redundancy in the Primarch project which is why certain specialisations or styles of warfare crop up more than once.

Malcador mentions in one of the HH novels that there was a certain amount of redundancy in the Primarch project which is why certain specialisations or styles of warfare crop up more than once.

Makes sense. Emperor hit perfection with the Lion on his first try, so after that it was just going through the motions because he already committed to making another 19.

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

 

If it’s just because they both liked melee, the same is true of plenty of others.

 

Blood angels didn’t have the anger management issues till after the heresy, they did have the thirst but that was not all that common and is very different anyway.

 

Honestly, I think it has more to do with Death Company and Khorne Berserkers being iconic units. They were the gold standard for loyalist and traitor close combat marines for a long time. They're basically a core part of their fraction's identity to a lot of us.

 

That said I don't really think they are very many loyalist vs. traitor counterparts. The different legions just all overlap a bit too much to make clean pairs. GW has done a good job on that front.   

 

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

I think it goes back to the fact that they had almost identical rules in 3rd edition and some fans have looooong memories. :wink:

 

Malcador mentions in one of the HH novels that there was a certain amount of redundancy in the Primarch project which is why certain specialisations or styles of warfare crop up more than once.

 

I absolutely disagree. Black Templars were much closer to World eaters back then

 

 

Why do blood angels keep getting lumped with world eaters? Neither legion had any indication of being rivals or anything of the sort. Wolves and world eaters had more rivalry during the heresy.

I think it goes back to the fact that they had almost identical rules in 3rd edition and some fans have looooong memories. :wink:

 

I absolutely disagree. Black Templars were much closer to World eaters back then

 

 

Look at the 3rd ed codices. Blood Angels and World Eaters both had to roll a dice for each unit at the start of every turn. If they failed (or succeeeded depending on your point of view), they had to run towards the enemy. I don't think BTs had a similar rule. BAs and WEs also both had the sam rule for +1S on the charge IIRC. Again BTs did not get that.

Edited by Karhedron

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.