Inquisitor_Lensoven Posted December 5, 2022 Author Share Posted December 5, 2022 6 hours ago, jarms48 said: Before, so after we lose it the bombast will be far worse. As the best you will hit on is 4+ rather than 3+, and you become AP-2 instead of AP-3 after take aim. Yeah, but even with the math I've showed you above it takes 4 bombasts to kill 8 guardsmen on average, with take aim. That's before factoring in things like light cover, dense cover, artillery debuff. The situation just gets worse and worse the more you add into it. Yeah I agree the bombast has proven to be less than great, but the malleus still has some potential Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5889936 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarms48 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) Yeah. Honestly, this is what I would do to buff them: - Drop them all to 60 points, so 120 points for the unit. - Bombast becomes Heavy D3+3. So while they are slightly better autocannon shots, you're at least putting out a minimum of 8. - Malleus gets indirect fire. It's stats are fine honestly. - Lascannon, as I said, it's the best option already currently. Just a small point drop would make it more appealing. Edited December 6, 2022 by jarms48 Emperor Ming 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890162 Share on other sites More sharing options...
INKS Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) I thought bombast was the best currently? Or does this take into account the removal of data slate? Meaning that las cannon is now best? Is this really the best way to get 2 las cannons? Edited December 6, 2022 by INKS Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890165 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarms48 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 The lascannons were always the best option. Bombast suffers from being a slightly better autocannon profile. Just see the math hammer I post on the last page. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890167 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sairence Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Yeah, both the Malleus and the Heavy Las atm have to answer the question: why should I not just pay 25p more and take a Punisher/Demolisher, who can basically do the same thing, but are way tougher, way more mobile and way more flexible. A points drop would help with that Emperor Ming 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890240 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Ming Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 They also need a keyword to make them decent, be it infantry, vehicle or core They need something Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890241 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minsc Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Got 2 waiting on sprues, awaiting an official statement/rule regarding LoS. If we get to keep indirect without penalties, I'll assemble them as Bombasts (with Take Aim they're decent). If not I'll assemble them as Heavy Lascannons and probably only use them on rare occasions for the memes... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890331 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor_Lensoven Posted December 6, 2022 Author Share Posted December 6, 2022 12 minutes ago, Minsc said: Got 2 waiting on sprues, awaiting an official statement/rule regarding LoS. If we get to keep indirect without penalties, I'll assemble them as Bombasts (with Take Aim they're decent). If not I'll assemble them as Heavy Lascannons and probably only use them on rare occasions for the memes... We have gotten an official statement. the datasheet won’t apply to the new codex Emperor Ming 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890336 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sairence Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 On the plus side, it seems really easy to make them modular. :) Inquisitor_Lensoven 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890401 Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldWherewolf Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 (edited) On 12/3/2022 at 11:55 PM, Inquisitor_Lensoven said: Has anyone done the math hammer on each option? This is just the base output, no doctrines, orders, and without the indirect penalty, but does include Armor of Contempt Turret weapon +1 to hit Cadian Lasgun & Laspistol exploding 6s (so the chimera is slightly buffed) The funny thing is, implementing the indirect penalty across the board will mean Guard is even stronger, as the Basilisk/Manticore is ~30% worse per point than a LRBT, and LRBTs are really strong. So we'll just stop taking indirect and take more LRBTs. If GW wants to stop the indirect spam, I think they could do something like 'in a Strike Force Match Play game, the Guard player may pick up to 3 units and those units do not suffer the indirect penalty". Then arty isn't spammable, but isn't dog with a diarrhea gravy either. Compared to regular guardsmen, the FOBs are actually durable. The problem is that they're still guard, and will still die to any concentrated firepower. Their only advantage is that the FOBs will be farther back, meaning they'll take away firepower from the closer infantry, sentinels, bullgryns & LRBTs. So they might survive thru target saturation & priority. But there is a TON of "ifs" around that. 9th is just so lethal that we have to assume anything in the open is just gonna die Edited December 7, 2022 by OldWherewolf Emperor Ming 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376717-the-case-for-the-field-ordnance-battery-fob/page/2/#findComment-5890583 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now