Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 4/27/2023 at 1:34 AM, SkimaskMohawk said:

 

As shown by....what?

 

Call it the failure of the series, but we've literally only seen the lion fight curze. Yes, he grew up on Caliban in the forests with the beasts; no, we don't know how many of those he killed or how theyre more impressive than the magma dragons on nocturne, the thing ferrus killed on medusa, the Greek myth stuff pert killed on Olympia, the stuff on fenris, the mutants on baal, or really any of the crazy xenos stuff fought in the crusade. 

 

It's similar to claims that he was a contestant for warmaster. He's hailed as this strategist, but we never see it; he basically only makes the wrong decision. The biggest campaign we see him in is thramas, and he got stalemated by a legion known for its dysfunction and unreliable primarch. It's all just in-universe gossip at this point.  

 

 

Lol maybe someone should have told sang he was only fighting a beast, not like angron was shown to have any higher reasoning in echoes.

Expand  

We know about the Rangdan Xenocides, but I would say his Primarch novel and the Khrave are a good example too. Multiple Legions and the Emperor came together to break an Ork empire, meanwhile the Lion xenocides another race off the galaxy.

 

And we know a bit about the creatures of Caliban, as well as a description of the creature he killed before Luther found him naked and feral on Caliban (somewhere he was for ten years before that). We also know from Descent of Angels on how much of a monster a Caliban Lion is and he killed one of those on his own long before he got Imperium grade Primarch kit.

 

And to quote First Legion, again, where the Lion is answered how he wants to be remembered by a member of the Order back on Caliban:

  Quote

"That I was ever, and only, thus," he says, tasting the raw, frigid air of another Caliban dawn. "The hunter. The slayer of beasts."

Expand  

 

The Lion is a hunter, to try and argue that he is not is denying who the Lion is in order to make arguments I can't even pretend make sense.

 

Also we have seen the Lion as a tactician. In his Primarch novel, and again leading a fleet of outclassed ships in Son of the Forest. Heck in his Primarch novel he's dealing with a xenos race that can control people and read their minds and still manages to trick them while dealing with a crew that is more than likely compromised at the time.

 

I admit I haven't read everything involving the Lion, but it feels like people are ignoring things to draw a conclusion of him as only being a hothead who makes poor choices and struggles at hide and seek.

Edited by BitsHammer
  On 4/26/2023 at 9:54 PM, Scribe said:

 

No, I didnt.

 

However when people just want to take the piss out of what makes the setting what it is, because others voice their particular 'understanding' of what the setting is in a manner that is not in any way realistic or respectful to the tone or lore of the setting, this is what happens.

 

40K is grimdark. They practically are the trope maker. To try and trivialize or mock it, just speaks to a lack of understanding on what that trope actually is.

Expand  

 

Get a grip, man. 

You'd be happily mocking any Loyalist/Primaris "fanboy" if they turned up into ANY halfway-related discussion and produced similiar fiction of how a regular Chapter should kill BILLIONS of Traitors and TRILLIONS of Xenos with ease.

...also remember the Roots of said "Grimdark" universe and how mockery and persiflage of real life history is an intrinsic part of it.

 

...

To get back on topic - The book itself:

 

Mike Brooks might not be among the top contenders in the BL stable, but he did a decent job of it.

...and I bet a good Editor COULD have helped him to improve the "character voices".

 

Most importantly tho, he probably was under time constraints AND he had a very narrow window of things he was able to include in the book.

 

The Limited Edition Afterword contains no special twists or news but confirms a few things. Brooks was told he had to write the Lion "between sourcebooks" and that he was supposed to have him pick up some Fallen. Brooks explains that his major points were the Lions character development, setting up the Fallen and the references to King Arthur. That’s also where he got his idea of the Emperor as the bleeding king.

 

To Quote:

 

  Quote



"This, then, became the main thrust of Son of the Forest: The Lion has to work out who he is outside of the context of being his father's son, and in doing so he Gets The Band Back Together because while he doesn't know for sure if he trusts them, at least they're something familiar in this strange future".

Expand  

 

Also Brooks definitely did his homework on the Lion. He also luckily left the Watchers as mysterious as they should be!

He -tried- to make the Caliban-Forestwalking just as mysterious, but that fell a bit flat. Maybe fleshing those scenes out a bit more, to make the Lion and/or the reader second guess if it was just an old Calibanite Arsenal he found the sword in, if it was the Watchers doing or even the Emperor's/Bleeding King's helping hand - WITHOUT giving a definitive answer - could have gone a long way.

 

Also, in fairness, this should be compared to INDOMITUS and other books which are more closely related to the tabletop releases, instead of the Siege of Terra or the various book (trilogies/series) where the authors have more freedom.

I stayed out of this thread as I usually do to avoid spoilers, but seeing it grow I was rather excited- 9(!) pages of discussion and the book has been available for little over a week! Wow! People must have been as hyped about the return of a Primarch actually being covered in a novel rather than sourcebook and have read it even faster than I did. 
 

Oh. It’s 9 pages largely of people arguing about the sourcebook and saying how terrible Son of the Forest is based on a few sentences summarising the plot rather than actually reading it. And then there’s the folk who can’t use spoiler tags. Ah well. It’s early in the morning and I’m probably disproportionately grumpy.

 

I liked it. It’s not perfect, but there’s an awful lot going for it. I opted for the audiobook and Timothy Watson, on the strength of the two BL audios I’ve head from him (and his villainy in The Archers) has propelled himself to the position of my favourite narrator. Not sure if it was his excellent work of Brooks’ writing but the characters did feel suitably distinct from each other. In fact, the relationships between some of the marine characters are perhaps the best portrayal I’ve read since the tragic Thousand Sons in Mark of Faith- they vary and are nuanced and a believable as any interaction between millennia-old post-human super soldiers can be.

 

Brooks also has a great eye for detail, as others mention the void battles are well-observed and the plot makes as much logical sense as one can expect given the constraints it was presumably written under. He manages to summarise the role of the First Legion during the crusade and the Heresy without subjecting the reader to heavy-handed exposition, concisely summarising their actions and character. I think the supposed contrivance of him acquiring his armaments and indeed

  Reveal hidden contents

is intentional- the fact the he happens to have returned from stasis at all is wildly convenient; all of these events have seemingly been guided by *something* so why shouldn’t everything necessary for his return to action be conveniently located- he could equally well have returned on a barren uninhabited moon way beyond  contact or in a Tyranid digestion pool; both of these scaranios would lead to a short book and one that wouldn’t tie in with a model release.

 

Also, I like the fact that the Khornate terminator’s chainfist had eyes. It made me think of this-

 

 

15D036DA-5F6C-4D72-9B79-3BC3B6B845F5.jpeg

  On 4/27/2023 at 6:35 AM, aa.logan said:

Oh. It’s 9 pages largely of people arguing about the sourcebook and saying how terrible Son of the Forest is based on a few sentences summarising the plot rather than actually reading it. And then there’s the folk who can’t use spoiler tags. Ah well. It’s early in the morning and I’m probably disproportionately grumpy.

 

 

Expand  

This happens pretty much with any BL novel these days, honestly. Be it this forum or r/40klore. Someone reads the bad cliff notes and gets immediately pissed about something. And then come the other "wanderers". One spouting about CHAOS! killing BILLIONS! and another endlessly complains about anything that doesn't comply with the "old lore"...

  On 4/27/2023 at 2:43 AM, BitsHammer said:

We know about the Rangdan Xenocides, but I would say his Primarch novel and the Khrave are a good example too. Multiple Legions and the Emperor came together to break an Ork empire, meanwhile the Lion xenocides another race off the galaxy.

 

And we know a bit about the creatures of Caliban, as well as a description of the creature he killed before Luther found him naked and feral on Caliban (somewhere he was for ten years before that). We also know from Descent of Angels on how much of a monster a Caliban Lion is and he killed one of those on his own long before he got Imperium grade Primarch kit.

 

And to quote First Legion, again, where the Lion is answered how he wants to be remembered by a member of the Order back on Caliban:

 

The Lion is a hunter, to try and argue that he is not is denying who the Lion is in order to make arguments I can't even pretend make sense.

 

Also we have seen the Lion as a tactician. In his Primarch novel, and again leading a fleet of outclassed ships in Son of the Forest. Heck in his Primarch novel he's dealing with a xenos race that can control people and read their minds and still manages to trick them while dealing with a crew that is more than likely compromised at the time.

 

I admit I haven't read everything involving the Lion, but it feels like people are ignoring things to draw a conclusion of him as only being a hothead who makes poor choices and struggles at hide and seek.

Expand  

 

And how are the beasts more impressive than the monsters all those other primarchs fought? I'm not saying he doesn't consider himself to be a hunter; I'm saying that his self classification isn't actually distinctive in any way when you compare things.

 

I'll admit to not reading his primarch book, but unless it's able to recontextualize his actions, then on the balance he's one of many primarchs who have fought monstrous things, he's basically always made the wrong decision, while always having an inflated opinion of himself.

The beasts on Caliban were mostly mindless spawn and mutated animals. Some of them were no doubt big and formidable, unble to be taken down until the knightly crusade., but by and large they were a threat scaled to the scattered feudal settlements of Caliban ( or a feral child primarch). Bolt pistols and swords...normal men on horseback. The forests weren't full of things comparable to greater daemons.

 

Nobody wants daemon primarchs to be unbeatable, but i don't understand the amount of justification for collectively turning them into disposable, repeatedly bested foes. I for one just want better, more interesting confrontations than constantly going to the same 1 vs 1 duel...which almost every single time results in the writers portraying them as more directly formidable than their normal counterparts, yet losing or being foiled. It's just gettnig silly and we're at the point the writers have even used literal deus ex machina.

 

the Angron vs Lion fight is just a straw that broke the camels back moment for me.

 

 

 

  On 4/27/2023 at 11:13 AM, SkimaskMohawk said:

 

And how are the beasts more impressive than the monsters all those other primarchs fought? I'm not saying he doesn't consider himself to be a hunter; I'm saying that his self classification isn't actually distinctive in any way when you compare things.

 

I'll admit to not reading his primarch book, but unless it's able to recontextualize his actions, then on the balance he's one of many primarchs who have fought monstrous things, he's basically always made the wrong decision, while always having an inflated opinion of himself.

Expand  

The First Legion was responsible for exterminating threats that the other Legions couldn't handle. And the Khrave were highly intelligent so while being monstrous Xenos they were not mindless things.

  On 4/27/2023 at 1:34 PM, Fedor said:

The beasts on Caliban were mostly mindless spawn and mutated animals. Some of them were no doubt big and formidable, unble to be taken down until the knightly crusade., but by and large they were a threat scaled to the scattered feudal settlements of Caliban ( or a feral child primarch). Bolt pistols and swords...normal men on horseback. The forests weren't full of things comparable to greater daemons.

 

Nobody wants daemon primarchs to be unbeatable, but i don't understand the amount of justification for collectively turning them into disposable, repeatedly bested foes. I for one just want better, more interesting confrontations than constantly going to the same 1 vs 1 duel...which almost every single time results in the writers portraying them as more directly formidable than their normal counterparts, yet losing or being foiled. It's just gettnig silly and we're at the point the writers have even used literal deus ex machina.

 

the Angron vs Lion fight is just a straw that broke the camels back moment for me.

 

 

 

Expand  

Might want to read Descent of Angels where it's pointed out that the great beasts have a sort of malicious intelligence, even if they aren't as intelligent as humans, and take joy out of causing harm and suffering to boot.

  On 4/27/2023 at 3:43 PM, BitsHammer said:

The First Legion was responsible for exterminating threats that the other Legions couldn't handle.

Expand  

 

According....to them.

 

  On 4/27/2023 at 3:43 PM, BitsHammer said:

And the Khrave were highly intelligent so while being monstrous Xenos they were not mindless things.

Expand  

 

As opposed to all the xenos races and dark night horrors that other legions dealt with? This is all still us just being told that they're impressive and better, without ever being shown. It's like the wolves with the executioners.

 

  On 4/27/2023 at 3:43 PM, BitsHammer said:

Might want to read Descent of Angels where it's pointed out that the great beasts have a sort of malicious intelligence, even if they aren't as intelligent as humans, and take joy out of causing harm and suffering to boot.

Expand  

 

I have. I fail to see how the great beasts are any more noteworthy than all the other stuff primarchs dealt with over the crusade; they're warp-influenced predators. What makes them this incomparable influence.

  On 4/27/2023 at 3:43 PM, BitsHammer said:

Might want to read Descent of Angels where it's pointed out that the great beasts have a sort of malicious intelligence, even if they aren't as intelligent as humans, and take joy out of causing harm and suffering to boot.

Expand  

 

I have read DoA, albeit over a decade ago now. I forgot that line, but i do distinctly remember it portraying the deadliest beast on Caliban as basically an oversized Chaosified lion; which was capable of being defeated by a single inexperienced psyker (zahariel). tbh that book made Caliban seem closer to a traditional heroic fantasy spooky enchanted forest realm, rather than a Chaos-tainted deathworld. Completely dropped the ball there, though i did like some other aspects of it.

 

  On 4/27/2023 at 4:25 PM, SkimaskMohawk said:

 

According....to them.

Expand  

 

Sadly, Crusade did basically say (albeit from a second-hand source) that the Dark Angels were the secret uber-exterminators of all the deadliest foes during the GC; the ones too existentially terrifying or powerful to even let others know exist, lest their minds break. It's part of the extremely ham-handed way it goes about the concept of them being the "template" legion, and having been given a DaoT cache by the Emperor.  I guess this was the Alpha Legion themed part... if Alpha Legion background had been written by a 10 year old creating background for his first army.

 

Of course, that wasn't enough: they are also the sanction for the mechanicum with that DaoT.  For reasons that escape me, these parts of the new DA background that it acts as the base for have become widely popular. I guess the fanbase is just not as averse to "sell these new models/faction as the best ever" stuff, compard to back in the Ward days.

 

 

  On 4/27/2023 at 6:37 PM, Fedor said:

 

Sadly, Crusade did basically say (albeit from a second-hand source) that the Dark Angels were the secret uber-exterminators of all the deadliest foes during the GC; the ones too existentially terrifying or powerful to even let others know exist, lest their minds break. It's part of the extremely ham-handed way it goes about the concept of them being the "template" legion, and having been given a DaoT cache by the Emperor.  I guess this was the Alpha Legion themed part... if Alpha Legion background had been written by a 10 year old creating background for his first army.

 

Of course, that wasn't enough: they are also the sanction for the mechanicum with that DaoT.  For reasons that escape me, these parts of the new DA background that it acts as the base for have become widely popular. I guess the fanbase is just not as averse to "sell these new models/faction as the best ever" stuff, compard to back in the Ward days.

 

 

Expand  

 

Crusade is very inconsistent with the black library materials, and was heavily criticised for it's take on the dark angels when it released. I even remember a member here deconstructing it and the primarch novel as a PR washed dark angel propoganda piece. It's kinda the only way to square the two, contradictory, narratives around thramas. 

 

*rubbing temples*

 

About 3 pages of power level discussions and why A can/should/would defeat B and why not.

 

And now it's about which of the DAs feats are true and whichare made up?

 

I'm saying this as a member and not as a mod but I'm extremely tired of the everlasting Primarch vs Primarch discussions. They don't elevate a discussion and are quite repetitive, especially when it's about loyal and daemon Primarchs.

 

I for one finally got my copy and I can't wait to dive in and see for myself. That's still the best way to experience a story and find a conclusion for myself.

  On 4/27/2023 at 6:37 PM, Fedor said:

 

I have read DoA, albeit over a decade ago now. I forgot that line, but i do distinctly remember it portraying the deadliest beast on Caliban as basically an oversized Chaosified lion; which was capable of being defeated by a single inexperienced psyker (zahariel). tbh that book made Caliban seem closer to a traditional heroic fantasy spooky enchanted forest realm, rather than a Chaos-tainted deathworld. Completely dropped the ball there, though i did like some other aspects of it.

 

Expand  

You forgot that the Calibanite Lion was basically immune to bolter rounds and had killed nearly 200 people at the time and killed Zahariel's childhood hero and mentor before that fight. If he wasn't able to tap into his psyker abilities he would have been dead. Heck, when he left the entire Order assumed he would be dead and never able to return. His return in victory was a big deal to the Order and even made the Lion respect him.

 

This might help others understand the Calibanite Lion a bit more with obvious spoilers:

  Quote
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

The Lion is the only other person on Caliban who had ever killed a Calibanite Lion. 

  On 4/27/2023 at 9:32 PM, BitsHammer said:

The Lion is the only other person on Caliban who had ever killed a Calibanite Lion. 

Expand  

Isn't it that they're the only lion killers alive at that time, because the lions were already extinct and they killed the two last ones?

  On 4/27/2023 at 9:32 PM, BitsHammer said:

You forgot that the Calibanite Lion was basically immune to bolter rounds and had killed nearly 200 people at the time and killed Zahariel's childhood hero and mentor before that fight. If he wasn't able to tap into his psyker abilities he would have been dead. Heck, when he left the entire Order assumed he would be dead and never able to return. His return in victory was a big deal to the Order and even made the Lion respect him.

 

This might help others understand the Calibanite Lion a bit more with obvious spoilers:

The Lion is the only other person on Caliban who had ever killed a Calibanite Lion. 

Expand  

 

i didn't forget, but i don't see why any of that contradicts thinking it wasn't depicted as being all that impressive in the grand scheme of things, just a suitably deadly foe for the limited resources the Calibanites had.

 

It's more Juggernaut or souped up Flesh Hound than greater daemon or daemon primarch, and this is supposed to be the most formidable of them.

  On 4/27/2023 at 10:50 PM, Fedor said:

 

i didn't forget, but i don't see why any of that contradicts thinking it wasn't depicted as being all that impressive in the grand scheme of things, just a suitably deadly foe for the limited resources the Calibanites had.

 

It's more Juggernaut or souped up Flesh Hound than greater daemon or daemon primarch, and this is supposed to be the most formidable of them.

Expand  

 

I feel like there is a massive disconnect here between various power levels.

 

Something like: Child -> Grot -> Adult Human -> Geneforged Human -> Astartes -> Custode -> Primarch.

 

If a Caliban Lion is a noteworthy feat for an Astartes, its still something that should basically trivial for a Primarch. They are a breed apart.

 

The Lion, killing a Caliban Lion may be a way to signal his potency, but to any other Primarch its a Tuesday no?

  Quote

I'm saying this as a member and not as a mod but I'm extremely tired of the everlasting Primarch vs Primarch discussions. They don't elevate a discussion and are quite repetitive, especially when it's about loyal and daemon Primarchs.

Expand  

 

At the risk of stating the obvious, this is what moves product. It gets the people going.

 

The fanbase voted with their wallets for this. The HH/Siege has been endless meaningless slapfights between Primarchs. Guilliman's return was around fighting one Primarch, with the promise of fighting others. The Lion has been brought back and almost immediately fights another Primarch. The time of Herohammer is upon us once more. Rejoice! 

  On 4/27/2023 at 10:55 PM, Scribe said:

 

I feel like there is a massive disconnect here between various power levels.

 

Something like: Child -> Grot -> Adult Human -> Geneforged Human -> Astartes -> Custode -> Primarch.

 

If a Caliban Lion is a noteworthy feat for an Astartes, its still something that should basically trivial for a Primarch. They are a breed apart.

 

The Lion, killing a Caliban Lion may be a way to signal his potency, but to any other Primarch its a Tuesday no?

Expand  

How many other Primarchs spent a decade living in the wild killing creatures like the Calibanite Lion? Or even fought creatures in that ballpark? Most of them fought humans to take control of their planets. The Lion's campaign to clear Caliban was unique because of what he had to fight to do it. About the only other one I can think of who dealt with non-humans was Vulkan who dealt with Dark Eldar.

 

As for the Lion's achievements to the Lion it's just another mark on his belt at that point and while the most impressive at that time, it was hardly the only dangerous thing he's killed and it was more an impressive achievement for the main character of Descent of Angels, but the point is that the Lion made the kill through mundane means, not psychic powers.

 

My point was to point out we do have some establishment of the Lion's accomplishments far beyond "we're only told he can do X but never see him do X or what X was like". People were claiming he wasn't shown to be a hunter or tactician but we had evidence of that from the Heresy, so I guess now we're just going to undermine his achievements to claim that he shouldn't have beaten Angron because his achievements suck or something.

  On 4/27/2023 at 11:26 PM, BitsHammer said:

How many other Primarchs spent a decade living in the wild killing creatures like the Calibanite Lion? Or even fought creatures in that ballpark? Most of them fought humans to take control of their planets. The Lion's campaign to clear Caliban was unique because of what he had to fight to do it. About the only other one I can think of who dealt with non-humans was Vulkan who dealt with Dark Eldar.

 

As for the Lion's achievements to the Lion it's just another mark on his belt at that point and while the most impressive at that time, it was hardly the only dangerous thing he's killed and it was more an impressive achievement for the main character of Descent of Angels, but the point is that the Lion made the kill through mundane means, not psychic powers.

 

My point was to point out we do have some establishment of the Lion's accomplishments far beyond "we're only told he can do X but never see him do X or what X was like". People were claiming he wasn't shown to be a hunter or tactician but we had evidence of that from the Heresy, so I guess now we're just going to undermine his achievements to claim that he shouldn't have beaten Angron because his achievements suck or something.

Expand  

 

Ferrus early years were very similar to the Lion...only replace Chaos tainted beasts with Necrons, various xenos, and DaoT related abominations.

 

it's not about demeaning his accomplishments; it's about not thinking pointing out hunting those beasts has much relevance as a justification for beating Angron (or anything else of similar power). Would you argue Ferrus has one up on a confrontation with the Silent King because he raided Necron tombs and killed a giant wyrm construct? Hopefully not.

Maybe if I shout loudly enough, it will banish this headache-inducing discussion to the Arks of Omen thread where it belongs.

 

I READ THE SAMPLE CHAPTERS OF THIS NOVEL AND IT WAS DECENT! WASN'T WOWED, BUT I ENJOYED IT. I HOPE BROOKS GETS TO WRITE THE LION'S "DARK IMPERIUM" TRILOGY DOWN THE LINE.

  Quote

Out of respect for Roomsky, I'm out. ;)

Expand  

 

Out of disrespect for Roomsky, I'm in! 

 

The Lion isn't getting a Dark Imperium trilogy. He doesn't have Plague Wars to fight. What conflict does he have, actually? He's a cool old guy who totally cares about all those little humans now. Dante has bent the knee. Where do we actually go from here? He just rolls around beatsticking people?

You would challenge me here Wechat, in the heart of my power? You may be mightier on Reddit, but B&C is the crucible by which titans are formed. Where Darkchaplain battles Moonreaper. Where we once posted alongside HeritorA

 

/s

 

Maybe I'm just hopeful that by extending this into a trilogy we'll get more of the interesting internal conflict it sounds like this book just sort of danced around. It sounds like there's plenty of gaps between meeting Dante and fighting Angron that could be filled with PATHOS and DRAMA and NAVEL-GAZING. Have him decide that Dante's the real leader Nihilus needs, you cowards.

 

Also, considering how Godblight ended, fairly substantial rewrites are possible (but ideally not for the worse, this time.) Maybe we could even get a version of the big primarch dick-jousting match that doesn't annoy as much of the fanbase!

 

Or maybe I'm still so salty about Godblight I'd like to see Brooks write 3 novels, however, middling, just to have a less hair-pulling alternative.

  On 4/27/2023 at 9:21 PM, Kelborn said:

*rubbing temples*

 

About 3 pages of power level discussions and why A can/should/would defeat B and why not.

 

And now it's about which of the DAs feats are true and whichare made up?

 

I'm saying this as a member and not as a mod but I'm extremely tired of the everlasting Primarch vs Primarch discussions. They don't elevate a discussion and are quite repetitive, especially when it's about loyal and daemon Primarchs.

 

I for one finally got my copy and I can't wait to dive in and see for myself. That's still the best way to experience a story and find a conclusion for myself.

Expand  

 

Well the arks book is basically part 2 of the novel, because the novel is super tie in fiction to even explain why the character is back. So they're rather strongly interlinked. Some people dont like the framing that both tie in books provide for the lion; other people think they're crazy for holding that opinion. 

 

My favorite parts of the plague war trilogy wasn't guilliman fighting people; it was him talking to them and interacting. Unfortunately, as others have pointed out, the primarchs fighting things sell novels, and so we have passages of it in....almost every book a primarch features in. If it's done poorly, it gets commented on. And if their character seems to have a sudden change, it'll also get commented on (see all the comments made on abnetts books).

 

I do agree on reading the work itself, and i look forward to it over the weekend.

I think we have room for a trilogy. I mean for a start the Lion has a "feeling" he'll see Angron again soon, but honestly I'd like to see them tie the Lion into the Nids because a person who hunts beasts versus the Nids could be a lot of fun.

 

Also if the Lion is going to be the Imperium Nihlus primarch running through the woods killing monsters and protecting people while Guilliman does paperwork and politics in the "True Imperium" I think we have a good dynamic since the Dark Imperium needs more lore, plus it has a lot of fires to put out we don't even know much about other than the Blood Angels have been slowly trying to reconnect worlds, and the Lion has done the same and the Arks of Omen books ended in Nihlus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.