Jump to content

Annual Report 2022 - 2023


Recommended Posts

I read it because I was bored at work.

Only thing that I noticed, other than the fact they made loads of money, is the the Old World is soon to be released, which I guess we already knew, and that Warhammer+ subscriptions increased to a total of 136,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn’t seem to harp on the IT transformation as badly this time and the new Lam guy being appointed to direct the project seems like we might see some improvement in the :cuss: that is their production and warehousing. Who knows, maybe in 23-24 we will able to actually buy the new releases! That’s a novel thought. 

Edited by Tyriks
do not dodge the swear filter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marshal Rohr said:

They didn’t seem to harp on the IT transformation as badly this time and the new Lam guy being appointed to direct the project seems like we might see some improvement in the :cuss: that is their production and warehousing. Who knows, maybe in 23-24 we will able to actually buy the new releases! That’s a novel thought. 

 

Imagine if they can actually get items in stock in a timely manner so I can order Titanicus stuff...

Edited by Tyriks
quote
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks as always for the sober and well-informed analysis, N1SB! Wonder how much that production bottleneck figured into the choice to eliminate several older Marine minis.

 

Otherwise, my big surprise is that Warhammer+ subscriptions actually increased. That thing became a content ghost town after the first few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, N1SB said:

I

 

 

+++ Here's What I Was Afraid Of (But GW CEO Is Not Wrong) +++

 

 

1.thumb.JPG.fed9a1115a712e521e1cefa62c989c8d.JPG

 

Games Workshop has "decided not to expand our manufacturing footprint further during the year."  It's what I was afraid of, but I don't blame the CEO:

  • Sooner rather than later Games Workshop will really need to expand its manufacturing footprint or it can't grow
  • But I'd have made the exact same decision if I was in the CEO's position...now's the wrong time for expansion

The problem is the UK economy right now is very unstable.  It's like when we got the 1st Indices for 10th ed and we're like "they're going to nerf this thing with Deathwatch's Devastating Wounds, right?"  We didn't leap to buy anything, we're like "yeah...I'll just play with the armies I got while things settle."

 

And I think that's how Games Workshop feels right now.  Our Brothers in the UK already know this, but for those outside the UK, there's a lot of discussion about Interest Rates about to go up.  The UK uses Variable Mortgages, meaning the house payments might shoot up, beyond people's means to pay them.

 

So in the same way it's a really bad time to think about buying a house in the UK, it's a bad time for Games Workshop to buy another factory.

 

(If anything, I'd be thinking of building a factory in Memphis, Tennessee, USA, to diversify.  But it's equally bad for Games Workshop at this moment.)

 

Both Timperial Guard in my meta and Brother Green Scorpion here, who have 1st-hand experience, told me there have been advances in mould injection technology to do more with less, but based on how many things are Temporarily out of stock Online, empirical evidence suggests it's not enough.

 



I'm local to the area, the new factory is very swish I hear from people who've seen inside it. 

GW has always been very UK Manufacturing focussed, I'm not sure they've ever had long term production of miniatures outside the UK? (As opposed to books and other materials which are done elsewhere). A couple of other factors in their decision will be expanding again in the Nottingham area could be quite hard. The UK labour market very tight atm (low unemployment, many unemployed due to early retirement or health reasons). The East Midlands, where Nottingham is, has one of the lowest unemployment rates of any area in the UK. I know that GW had issues staffing up the last new factory they built in decent time. If their plan is to continue to be A.) UK based and B.) close to GW HQ there's more than one reason to be gun shy on a new plant.

Edited by Zeratil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know how subscription services work amongst other companies, but signing up 100k the first year and then getting 1/3 of that the next year seems not great. Also counting anyone as an active user if they’ve logged on within six months is quite the way to hide a drop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always thank you for your insight and taking the time to do your writeups N1SB!

 

Honestly on the subscription front sure 1/3 growth doesn't seem great but they didnt lose subscribers, and I wonder how much they care about the active user base as long as those users stay subscribed and feeding them money.

 

Makes me wonder how many are doing it just for the model  

Edited by Mechanicus Tech-Support
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So going back to your last analysis, you mentioned the state of AoS is dire simply on the basis that there's next to no growth for a big game despite a major edition change/update... but you've since revised your position on the Horus Heresy being successful...

 

What does that mean for the previous analysis? And what does they mean for the future of both AoS and HH as mainline game systems?

 

Is the release of Epic and Warhammer Fantasy a test so to speak to see if they can replace the flagging HH and AoS systems with a more efficient model system to increase sales margins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been said before, GW is quite risk averse. 

Investment in a further manufacturing plants, especially one abroad, comes at a cost. For one on home soil, there is the site, the facility and staffing. 

Some of the difficulties with this have been noted above.

Moving abroad adds legal costs and ancillary staff burden (and more besides, I'm sure).

The recent Painting Phase episode with an ex-GW staffer stressed how important GW  take quality control - the example given was paint QC. This would be an additional risk with taking production away from Notts.

A parallel could be drawn with Tamiya who expanded production from Japan to the Philippines. Some say that products from the new factory aren't as good when it comes to mould lines, paint quality on pre-painted items and other things.

Offshoring is only worth it if the profits are sufficient to make it worthwhile - examples such as Tamiya to the Philippines, UK customer service call centres to South Africa - and costs are significantly lower.

I'm sure the CEO has more one eye on a way to bring in sufficient funding to expand production if they can't afford to do it themselves :wink:

Edited by Rusted Boltgun
Poor proofing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something they could outsource to free up manufacturing space would be making the paint pots (and filling them), paint is made off site

 

I think we're also seeing with the Legends/rotation stuff that theyre aggressively freeing up warehouse space

 

I would be AMAZED if part of the Amazon negotiations arent over distribution/Amazon selling more stuff esp starter sets

 

*also have to single out N1SB's awesome point about 30k competing with 40k*

 

Without going off on one, the North of Ireland could be an excellent place for an extra factory

Edited by Dark Shepherd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Marshal Rohr said:

I don’t think GW will ever expand production to the US, even if it’s for specialist products they’ve had made previously like terrain kits. They can barely be bothered to keep North America stocked as is. 

Which strikes me as very silly, you would think that they'd build production capacity to handle the Americas. I've been idly thinking about what if they opened a facility in one of the new Mexican industrial parks they've been building. I'm sure they could get some sweet tax incentives, among other labor cost savings with space to integrate production for printing boxes and books or other accessories.

 

One thing I have been sitting and kinda considering when it comes to 40K and it's possible mainstream debut, there's a lack of good merch, and everything is kinda a mess where it all sorta contradicts each other and you never get a feeling of, "oh, this is definitively 40K". What I mean is, everything is sort of always an abstraction of something else. Marines on the table are not the ones in the books, and those are not the marines of the PC games. So when Ole' Jimmy starts watching The Cavill show, how does that turn him into a GW customer? Models seem too tedious, the books too many to decide where to enter, the PC games a smattering of good B-tier projects with a lot of chaff to get through. Like I said, idle thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of items out of stock at the moment is quite insane. But that is not just a GW problem. Several hobby companies have become victims of their own success. Bandai has been struggling for years too. And adding production facilities isn’t just something you do overnight 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

you never get a feeling of, "oh, this is definitively 40K"

 

 I disagree with this, 40k has a very unique identity and that's the grimdark of it all, it's death metal turned into a miniature game and very few things out there look like 40k and that's something that I hope isn't lost once this goes mainstream. As to the Canon, it doesn't matter if it's not set in stone imo, 40k is an aesthetic with which you can tell stories and that's what star wars has become with is myriad of series and movies, they are tied together by that space western aesthetic and what 40k should embrace more asxit goes mainstream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, NovemberIX said:

Which strikes me as very silly, you would think that they'd build production capacity to handle the Americas. 

 

Coming at this from an absolutely amateur level, but this seems like a huge cost sink for a benefit that could be gained much cheaper by just expanding production capacity at Nottingham. Even if they needed to add another machine, they can probably house it in an existing building or in a new building on land they already own and it can share access to raw materials storage and warehousing that already exists, rather than having to set up every aspect of that from scratch. Sure then there's international shipping costs, but you'd have to think that's cheaper than setting up a duplicate factory on another continent?

 

Basic napkin-maths example:

500 Lion El'Jonsons & 500 Farsights produced in USA as well as 500 Lion El'Jonsons & 500 Farsights produced in UK - Total boxes produced 2000, total factories needed: 2, total machines needed: 2, total molds needed: 4

VS

1000 Lion El'Jonsons & 1000 Farsights produced in UK - Total boxes produced 2000, total factories needed: 1 total machines needed: 2, total molds needed: 2

 

Obviously it's over simplified, but on the face of it you get the same amount of overall kits produced with half the investment in molds, factory sites and god knows how many other costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Halandaar said:

 

Coming at this from an absolutely amateur level, but this seems like a huge cost sink for a benefit that could be gained much cheaper by just expanding production capacity at Nottingham. Even if they needed to add another machine, they can probably house it in an existing building or in a new building on land they already own and it can share access to raw materials storage and warehousing that already exists, rather than having to set up every aspect of that from scratch. Sure then there's international shipping costs, but you'd have to think that's cheaper than setting up a duplicate factory on another continent?

 

Basic napkin-maths example:

500 Lion El'Jonsons & 500 Farsights produced in USA as well as 500 Lion El'Jonsons & 500 Farsights produced in UK - Total boxes produced 2000, total factories needed: 2, total machines needed: 2, total molds needed: 4

VS

1000 Lion El'Jonsons & 1000 Farsights produced in UK - Total boxes produced 2000, total factories needed: 1 total machines needed: 2, total molds needed: 2

 

Obviously it's over simplified, but on the face of it you get the same amount of overall kits produced with half the investment in molds, factory sites and god knows how many other costs.

 

I know this will never happen, but you could solve that inefficiency by moving all the production to the US! It's GW's largest market and land/energy are much cheaper. I remember from prior letters that just getting enough electricity was a challenge, and will likely only become more so as the whole of Europe struggles for lack of domestic energy production. Injection mold machines are thirsty beasts!

 

That said, it seems like the GW brass are a loyal bunch and unlikely to trust their precious plastic to the colonies. But you do wonder at what margin moving the machines to the great unregulated expanses of middle America would make sense...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asking a British company, working in a British industry, overwhelmingly supported by and employing British staff to uproot itself (or at the least, a very significant chunk of itself) and move to a foreign country and risk all of the instability, loss of reputation and potential technical skills that may come with such a move is farcical.

 

America is a great country, don't get me wrong, but it's just not practical. Nor appealing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.