Kharn13 Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 It does mean there will be a lot of EC codexes on eBay for cheap because of people buying both… Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6093993 Share on other sites More sharing options...
INKS Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 4 hours ago, 01RTB01 said: They were good books, this is super shiny. Considering the 'collectors' edition codexes are double the normal price, I'm assuming this will be around $200CAD in which case I'd bow out I think yeah I mean, I very well could see that. Remember the old Khorne one. It was metal! lol haha. thing was heavy. Not going to lie. I have been looking at that codex on and off all day. It really is beautiful. I kinda hope all armies get this sort of treatment. SalamandersBro and 01RTB01 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094018 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSM Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Random little detail I noticed: the Noise Marine's shoulder pad speakers match their backpack speakers. (ie. the one with two fangs, the one with the ring in the nose, etc.) (Unfortunately for me, as I was hoping that the Noise Marines kit would come with a bunch of interesting shoulder pads I could distribute amongst my Tormentors/Infractors. But if they are matched, that probably means there's just six in the kit.) darkseren1ty, Dr_Ruminahui, WrathOfTheLion and 4 others 6 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094146 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Really hoping we might get some leaks soon, hopefully if this weekend they finally announce the fomo box we can finally see some cracks Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094155 Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkseren1ty Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, Macidious said: Really hoping we might get some leaks soon, hopefully if this weekend they finally announce the fomo box we can finally see some cracks Fulgrims complete rule leak was out yesterday. M16” T10 W16 2+/4++ OC 6 Melee strike: A6 WS2+ S14 AP-3 D6+1 dmg sustained 1 melee sweep: A12 WS2+ S8 AP-2 D2 dmg sustained 1 extra attacks: A6 WS2+ S6 AP-1 D1 dmg ranged: A1 BS2+ S8 AP-2 D2 dmg precision abilities: Choose an enemy unit in engagement and make em suffer d3 mortals on 4+ choose 1/3 of the following each command phase: -fights first —1 to hit -battleshock enemies in engagement 385pts in the codex translated from French, and I’m a bit rusty, so might have mucked up a few deets Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094159 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Just now, darkseren1ty said: Fulgrims complete rule leak was out yesterday. M16” T10 W16 2+/4++ OC 6 Melee strike: A6 WS2+ S14 AP-3 D6+1 dmg sustained 1 melee sweep: A12 WS2+ S8 AP-2 D2 dmg sustained 1 extra attacks: A6 WS2+ S6 AP-1 D1 dmg ranged: A1 BS2+ S8 AP-2 D2 dmg precision abilities: Choose an enemy unit in engagement and make em suffer d3 mortals on 4+ choose 1/3 of the following each command phase: -fights first —1 to hit -battleshock enemies in engagement 385pts in the codex translated from French, and I’m a bit rusty, so might have mucked up a few deets Wasn’t that just the “leak” from the guy that said vindicators , predators , hellbrutes and forgefiends aren’t gonna be in the codex? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094161 Share on other sites More sharing options...
01RTB01 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 37 minutes ago, Macidious said: Wasn’t that just the “leak” from the guy that said vindicators , predators , hellbrutes and forgefiends aren’t gonna be in the codex? Yup. "Alleged" until proven otherwise Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094172 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, 01RTB01 said: Yup. "Alleged" until proven otherwise Yeah I don’t believe it personally, and won’t unless the leak is a “datacard or codex photo leak” cause anyone could type rules out Dalmyth 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094174 Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkseren1ty Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Well, I hope it’s not true. Coz it seems a bit underwhelming tbh. the lack of force multiplying options with fulgrim is thematic, but I’m not sure how that’ll translate in game Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094202 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, darkseren1ty said: Well, I hope it’s not true. Coz it seems a bit underwhelming tbh. the lack of force multiplying options with fulgrim is thematic, but I’m not sure how that’ll translate in game Well hopefully next week we will start to see some official stuff Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094207 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadlessCross Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 14 minutes ago, Macidious said: Well hopefully next week we will start to see some official stuff Or even this week. There has to be some influencer that doesn't care about getting anything early anymore and will go over the rules for the hell of it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094211 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonGSides Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 29 minutes ago, darkseren1ty said: Well, I hope it’s not true. Coz it seems a bit underwhelming tbh. the lack of force multiplying options with fulgrim is thematic, but I’m not sure how that’ll translate in game It's crazy you find him anemic while I'm sitting here wishing Mortarion were half as strong. Just give me Fulgrims sweep profile and I would be happy with the rest of the anchors he's got. Layer on a fights first ability and boy howdy I find him quite strong. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094214 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 26 minutes ago, HeadlessCross said: Or even this week. There has to be some influencer that doesn't care about getting anything early anymore and will go over the rules for the hell of it. Cause if it ever got back to gw that they were the ones that leaked it they’ll never get anything from gw again , not worth the risk Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094221 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeroWolf Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 20 minutes ago, DemonGSides said: It's crazy you find him anemic while I'm sitting here wishing Mortarion were half as strong. Just give me Fulgrims sweep profile and I would be happy with the rest of the anchors he's got. Layer on a fights first ability and boy howdy I find him quite strong. This is the kind of talk I've heard. There's some saying that EC are really strong while others are the complete opposite with very few in the middle saying "these look fun to play with/against" Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094223 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 7 minutes ago, ZeroWolf said: This is the kind of talk I've heard. There's some saying that EC are really strong while others are the complete opposite with very few in the middle saying "these look fun to play with/against" Well we shall see soon enough ZeroWolf 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094224 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 6 minutes ago, Macidious said: Well we shall see soon enough But if anyone who has it wants to speed this up I’ll be greatly appreciative hahaha Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094228 Share on other sites More sharing options...
INKS Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Regardless of leaks or stats, GW themselves said that Fulgrim is more powerful on the table top over Angron... so there is that. Cenobite Terminator 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094236 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadlessCross Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 5 minutes ago, INKS said: Regardless of leaks or stats, GW themselves said that Fulgrim is more powerful on the table top over Angron... so there is that. It's a crapshoot. They had Lionel killing Angron in combat in an article when averages determine it's VERY unlikely to happen. ZeroWolf 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094237 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogger351 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 30 minutes ago, Macidious said: But if anyone who has it wants to speed this up I’ll be greatly appreciative hahaha Tbh same, if only to understand what 3/4 other factions will turn into. Macidious 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094238 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 22 minutes ago, INKS said: Regardless of leaks or stats, GW themselves said that Fulgrim is more powerful on the table top over Angron... so there is that. They didn’t really say that, they just said in a fulgrim 1v1 with Angron he went 3/3 and I think it’s mainly cause he can fight first always so has a high chance just killing Angron before he gets a chance, but I do hope they’re on the same combat caliber Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094243 Share on other sites More sharing options...
01RTB01 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 1 hour ago, ZeroWolf said: This is the kind of talk I've heard. There's some saying that EC are really strong while others are the complete opposite with very few in the middle saying "these look fun to play with/against" If fulgrim can go 1:1 with Angron and win 3 of 3 then he's not going to be a slouch. With 16" move too he's terrifyingly fast. However, a primarch a faction doesn't make. Looking forward to seeing the codex but really want the minis in hand. Soon... Macidious, ZeroWolf and WrathOfTheLion 3 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094244 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 18 minutes ago, 01RTB01 said: If fulgrim can go 1:1 with Angron and win 3 of 3 then he's not going to be a slouch. With 16" move too he's terrifyingly fast. However, a primarch a faction doesn't make. Looking forward to seeing the codex but really want the minis in hand. Soon... We all want it as soon as possible , hopefully gw aren’t mean this Sunday and make us wait another week , especially when this is only the fomo box , not even the main attraction. i know they won’t do it , but would be cool if fulgrim came out along side the fomo box Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kharn13 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) Well, curtesy of someone on TRP discord. Either the leak is fake or we are missing a key army rule because Fulgrim has a 15.2% chance to kill Angron in an activation. Angron sits at around 49% without BW charge bonus. Even with FF, Angron charges Fulgrim. Fulgrim deals 7 wounds avg. Angron then deals 15 avg. 1cp throw up sustained and Fulgrim turns to dust. Edited February 11 by Kharn13 Cenobite Terminator 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094252 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonGSides Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, ZeroWolf said: This is the kind of talk I've heard. There's some saying that EC are really strong while others are the complete opposite with very few in the middle saying "these look fun to play with/against" I haven't heard anyone call it bad until the poster above. Everyone, everywhere else I've read has been really positive on the rumored statline. I really don't see how anyone sees flat 16" movement and a sweep profile with 2 damage as anything other than great but hey, it takes all kinds to make the world turn. Edited February 11 by DemonGSides Cenobite Terminator 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094259 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macidious Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 (edited) 5 minutes ago, DemonGSides said: I haven't heard anyone call it bad until the poster above. Everyone, everywhere else I've read has been really positive on the rumored statline. I really don't see how anyone sees flat 16" movement and a sweep profile with 2 damage as anything other than great but hey, it takes all kinds to make the world turn. I think as a base it’s solid , but there are elements that feel off and a bit lazy, like if it was true, they bigged up “demonic poisons” and it turns out to be that 4+ d3 mortal thing , very lack luster, and also his whip being a 1 attack precision but only does 2 damage , that ain’t a whip it’s a tickling rope Edited February 11 by Macidious Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384251-ec-rumours/page/74/#findComment-6094261 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now