DuskRaider Posted November 10 Share Posted November 10 (edited) 1 hour ago, Trokair said: Regarding the Ironbound Ruinhost, I'd be inclined to replace the HQ slot with a third compulsory Support slot, possibly even specifying that the compulsory slots be filled by Castellax. I think I’d just go with Crabby’s interpretation and say that they mixed the key words up. I also do like the change that I had come up with because it would mean that the Cyclops Stalker could give them orders, but I can see how that may break the whole idea of the Support Formation. Actually, that does bring a question to mind… I don’t have the book in front of me, but since it only lists March and Charge, those are the only two commands you can give the Automata in the Formation, correct? I’m just trying to wrap my head around the idea of bringing the Thanatar and only having those two commands to choose from. I suppose you would be forced to take the worse version of it, but… meh. Edited November 10 by DuskRaider Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075159 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Techwisp Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 Is it possible they intended to exclude the HQ Detachment from the requirement and simply forgot? As in, your HQ can just be an Archmagos on or off their Abyent as usual for a Mechanicum Taghmata list but everything else needs to have Cortex? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075298 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crablezworth Posted November 11 Author Share Posted November 11 (edited) I think they updated it. https://assets.warhammer-community.com/legions_imperialis_cyberneticaformations_eng-zurpceaquf-lcrrikcwdl.pdf Edited November 11 by Crablezworth DuskRaider and Trokair 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075309 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Techwisp Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 30 minutes ago, Crablezworth said: I think they updated it. https://assets.warhammer-community.com/legions_imperialis_cyberneticaformations_eng-zurpceaquf-lcrrikcwdl.pdf They did. Trokair 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075314 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 Well that makes more sense. Trokair 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075322 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Techwisp Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 I think that means you can put Tech Priest Auxilla in that one now since they're a Support Detachment with Cortex Controllers, right? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075332 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuskRaider Posted November 12 Share Posted November 12 1 hour ago, Indy Techwisp said: I think that means you can put Tech Priest Auxilla in that one now since they're a Support Detachment with Cortex Controllers, right? Yes, that would be correct. They don’t specify which Support detachments you have to take, only that you take two Support detachments as part of your Compulsory Detachments. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384540-support-formations/page/2/#findComment-6075338 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now