New Armies on Parade guidelines

[ZeroWolf]

18 minutes ago, Joe said:

Restriction has been removed.

 

As it should be, a blunder that could have easily been avoided.

[Indy Techwisp]

There's a part of me that thinks this "removal" of the restrictions is actually what GW intended the initial change to mean, but it was just written really badly.

[DemonGSides]

Nah, it's literally just walking it back to what it used to be.

 

They did a dumb and realized it relatively quickly. 

[Robbienw]

Must have been the rogue intern again lol

[phandaal]

43 minutes ago, Robbienw said:

Must have been the rogue intern again lol

 

Took a break from writing Codexes, lore, animation episodes... honestly, that intern is the hardest-working employee in the company! 

[Wormwoods]

Bullying works! Glad they walked it back.

[Xenith]

On 1/29/2025 at 6:22 PM, Evil Eye said:

 

Well, I hope you weren't planning on using any AOS parts in your 40K AoP entry...

 

 

That's not what it says. It says you cannot mix and match models from the settings, like have a rando mwood elf amongst your genestealer cult models. Conversions are fine. LOTR models have not been allowed to be officaill combined with other GW ranges since...2001, so this is not news. 

 

[Xenith]

=][= Right I'm going to lock this down as the link with proof seems to be dead, and whatever people are up in arms over has now been rescinded or never existed. If Evil Eye reposts a screen of the original wording, we can think about reopening. =][=