Land Raider choices ....

[Helias_Tancred]

New Question: Does the point costs of the three different Land Raider models keep you from running one and instead using another?

 

That is where I'm at personally. I like the stats of the Redeemer, but geez at 280 it's just under a primarch lol.  I keep thinking about the usefulness of the Crusader variant.

 

 

 

 

Edited Monday at 06:50 PM by Helias_Tancred

[Iron Father Ferrum]

Nope.  I look purely at the transport capacity & warload.  Points can be cut elsewhere if needs be.

[HeadlessCross]

11 hours ago, Helias_Tancred said:

New Question: Does the point costs of the three different Land Raider models keep you from running one and instead using another?

 

That is where I'm at personally. I like the stats of the Redeemer, but geez at 280 it's just under a primarch lol.  I keep thinking about the usefulness of the Crusader variant.

 

 

 

 

The Crusader being cheaper doesn't make it better. For even cheaper you can get a Repulsor at that point if that's the goal, and that can definitely be loaded out to do more anti-infantry if that's the goal. 

[Tacitus]

20 hours ago, HeadlessCross said:

The Crusader being cheaper doesn't make it better. For even cheaper you can get a Repulsor at that point if that's the goal, and that can definitely be loaded out to do more anti-infantry if that's the goal. 

Switching to the Repulsor also switches the transport rule i.e. charge vs deploy vs re-embark

[HeadlessCross]

3 hours ago, Tacitus said:

Switching to the Repulsor also switches the transport rule i.e. charge vs deploy vs re-embark

Which is a handy rule in its own right, but that 60 points will easily help shape a list different if cheaper is the goal. Otherwise just go all out for the Godhammer or Redeemer.