HeadlessCross Posted yesterday at 04:43 AM Share Posted yesterday at 04:43 AM Title says it all. Thr new Chapter Master is absurdly good here. I was initially afraid his output wouldn't be the best but I was SUPER wrong. The moment you spike a little on his Sustained it adds up quick. I'll post my list in a moment, but holy crap y'all gotta try the rules. You don't get the same CP economy as Ultramarines but you do save a good amount. Karhedron 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted yesterday at 08:09 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:09 AM Yes, Raven Guard can now give LAG Blood Angels a run for their money as the jumpy hitty marines army. While they don't have quite the raw hitting power of BAs, they do have some good units and an awesome bag of trick. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133644 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted yesterday at 08:37 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:37 AM Does it make up for the lack of +1 To Wound on the OoM target? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133647 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Knight Posted yesterday at 10:31 AM Share Posted yesterday at 10:31 AM 1 hour ago, Jolemai said: Does it make up for the lack of +1 To Wound on the OoM target? Isn't this an oversight that will be getting corrected anyway? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133666 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galron Posted yesterday at 01:02 PM Share Posted yesterday at 01:02 PM I know I listened to a BR and the TO at the big GT was allowing the +1 to wound as it was felt its exclusion was an error. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133690 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadlessCross Posted 19 hours ago Author Share Posted 19 hours ago 13 hours ago, Jolemai said: Does it make up for the lack of +1 To Wound on the OoM target? Why does it not benefit? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133777 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galron Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Its a wording issue involving the OoM and the named chapters thing. I havent heard of any TOs not allowing it since its assumed to be an obvious mistake on GWs part. Hopefully they will clarify it shortly. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386762-have-yall-used-the-new-raven-guard-detachment-its-stupid-good/#findComment-6133826 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now