Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, W.A.Rorie said:

I wish….i miss the days they were useful and you could gain attacks with them. 

Maybe make it a weapon option other than tracks.

Or boost the tracks like +1A +1S +1AP

 

vehicles that weigh dozens of tons or in some cases 100+ tons don’t seem to be very good at squishing things beneath them.

 

2 hours ago, W.A.Rorie said:

I wish….i miss the days they were useful and you could gain attacks with them. 

Maybe make it a weapon option other than tracks.

Or boost the tracks like +1A +1S +1AP

 

vehicles that weigh dozens of tons or in some cases 100+ tons don’t seem to be very good at squishing things beneath them.

I think terrain should be destructible. Always seemed silly to me that a knight could be trapped by a ruined wall. Let me roll to see if my mighty war engine knocks it over or trips over it. Either way the cowardly tau hiding behind it get crushed.

5 hours ago, W.A.Rorie said:

That's why we used to have difficult terrain tests back in the old days....:cry: "back in the old days"....Im old :facepalm:

Considering GWs new release schedule, you ain´t that old, brother. 

I have custom dozer blade on my leman russ, punisher, bullet impacts, cannon hole broke through, razorwire tangled on it, etc. Sheesh, i need to paint it soon

On 12/2/2025 at 11:26 PM, W.A.Rorie said:

I wish….i miss the days they were useful and you could gain attacks with them. 

 

 

When was this, i just remember they could re-rol difficult terrain tests, having got back into 40K after a hiatus around 5th edition the biggest shock to me apart from initiative disappearing was that tanks cant got through terrain.  on a board recently my land raiders were stuck in my deployment zone.  

 

Atleast tanks get attacks in CC now before max they could do was tank shock

Edited by Beef

I miss conversion images like this one from 4th edition rulebook, that showed very lovely part usage and how cool certain (sometimes unused) parts/options can actually be. 

GW should bring this kinda freedom back

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 01-00-43 pdfcoffee.com_warhammer-40k-4th-edition-rulebook-pdf-free.pdf.png

  • 3 weeks later...
On 12/7/2025 at 11:04 PM, Jukkiz said:

I miss conversion images like this one from 4th edition rulebook, that showed very lovely part usage and how cool certain (sometimes unused) parts/options can actually be. 

GW should bring this kinda freedom back

Screenshot 2025-12-08 at 01-00-43 pdfcoffee.com_warhammer-40k-4th-edition-rulebook-pdf-free.pdf.png

Damn, the double-width tracks on the Russ look really good!

 

Re: the Dozer Blade, I'd love to see proper rules for them back again, but I suspect you'd need to bring back proper difficult terrain rules for that to work. Which I feel like they should anyway, though with GW's current trend of assuming players are too stupid to comprehend basic abstraction, I doubt they will.

7 hours ago, Evil Eye said:

Damn, the double-width tracks on the Russ look really good!

 

Re: the Dozer Blade, I'd love to see proper rules for them back again, but I suspect you'd need to bring back proper difficult terrain rules for that to work. Which I feel like they should anyway, though with GW's current trend of assuming players are too stupid to comprehend basic abstraction, I doubt they will.

Maybe they bring it back to let vehicles move through buildings?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.