Altus Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 anybody have any information on this list being useable in 5th, or any info of an adeptus mech army codex coming out? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Orlock Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 I suspect that this list will be just as 'valid' in 5th as it was in 4th. I recall some rumour of Mechanicus elements in up coming material from ForgeWorld. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1588059 Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshall Egregorius Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 fw is going to make a full ad mech line. it was in the gamesday report on warseer. in regards to the validity of the lsit. its unofficial, use it if you want to, i know i will. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1758806 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Full-choke Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 I am currently reading through the entire thing as I rewrite it into a nice formal looking Codex with pictures and cool stuff. So far I have found nothing that would not apply from 4th Edition to 5th Edition. To be honest it is really a strong codex, why GW hasn't adopted it as a formal free print Codex I don't know. It balances itself quite well and I think it was nicely put together. On a side note (and I DO NOT WANT to steal this thread) is there any chance you could post something that verifies that about Forge World and the Ad Mech. If so that is awesome as I wouldn't be able to afford it but I think it would be so freaking sweet! F-C Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1758835 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Pariah Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 To be honest it is really a strong codex, why GW hasn't adopted it as a formal free print Codex I don't know. It balances itself quite well and I think it was nicely put together. Codices exist to sell models. There are no AdMech models to speak of, hence, no Codex. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1761697 Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshall Egregorius Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 To be honest it is really a strong codex, why GW hasn't adopted it as a formal free print Codex I don't know. It balances itself quite well and I think it was nicely put together. Codices exist to sell models. There are no AdMech models to speak of, hence, no Codex. yet they could create some. i prefer the tempus fugitives list myself though Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1763094 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaosLord Leon Enaek Posted November 8, 2008 Share Posted November 8, 2008 I too recently found the Tempestus Fugitives List, and I must say, it has caught my eye, what with it's neat and tidy 'use straight from C:SM' rules and...COGs :devil: Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1764790 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The emperors chosen Posted November 30, 2008 Share Posted November 30, 2008 what is the latest version of this list (mine still says to look in the sm armory)? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/137592-validity-of-tim-huckleberry-list-in-5th/#findComment-1791397 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.