Cornelias Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 on a side note has anyone every tried 3 bikes with 2x melta for the same kinda role only with more chance of survival. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutt-Man! Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Unfortunately that can be hit before you get to move and it costs more. (119 minimum / 105min) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 + it can be countered unlike deep striking termis [well maybe if someon runs mistics ] . you also have fewer shots . 3/4 termis is 3/4 melta shots , it should do something even , if your not 6" away . now 2 shots force you to get in to the 6" , because without the extra dice you just cant be sure they get the job done. now if we had attack bikes , it would be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukov Posted March 4, 2009 Author Share Posted March 4, 2009 Yeah Attack bikes, how I loved those those pesky units, they won me games with Marines. Pitty we dont have them, ah well actually it wouldnt be fair if we had these too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 wouldnt be fair since when are games or wars fair. If everything was fair and just as good , we would have draws all the time . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukov Posted March 4, 2009 Author Share Posted March 4, 2009 Haha do you mean you want certain armies to be structural better then others? I hope not, dont you like to win by just playing better? Thats what I'm aiming at, playing games with lists of roughly the same power. But indeed maybe is OP the better wording Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutt-Man! Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 That's what apocalypse is for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Haha do you mean you want certain armies to be structural better then others? I hope not, dont you like to win by just playing better? Thats what I'm aiming at, playing games with lists of roughly the same power. oh you mean same power like right now ? want to talk about how IG does against any meq army right now [the non IA ones at least] ? or how GK do in a tournament setting ? or how non DW/RW DA armies are just as good as armies build out of the new sm dex ? Or how eldar and nids[that I played in all tournaments in the 4th ed] were just as balanced as SoB ? there were always better armies , sure skills are important , but a GT lvls the top tables are always taken by the top players with good skills . its the lists and meta game that matter . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukov Posted March 5, 2009 Author Share Posted March 5, 2009 Jeske you now what I meant, and you arent answering my questions either... You dont have to tell me thats the game isnt belanced. And no I dont have hope that the game will become balanced ever. But do you like the fact that the game is imbalanced? And besides usually skilled players build good lists too. Cause thats part of a good player too not? building good lists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jeske Posted March 6, 2009 Share Posted March 6, 2009 But do you like the fact that the game is imbalanced? whats there to like ? am not the head of the DT , so I can do 0 about how the balanace w40k looks like . its just how it is . Just like I can imagine GW making rhino rush or flying circus , I can imagine GW giving "attack bikes" like units for chaos [if it would boost sales]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.