Judaz Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 Oops, poked the bear. I'm just saying that it's weird that an army that has most of it's lists (or a lot, I don't have statistics) without tacticals would have a BattleForce with a tactical squad in it. I'm not saying that everyone uses RAS only, I always have a tactical squad in my lists too, but a lot of people uses RAS only. And in a lot of cases in a razorback. Rhinos are soo last edition... And we got the worst deal. Vanilla SM: Save 36.4%, get 25 models Dark Angels: Save 29.2%, get 8 models (all vehicles) Wolves: Save 28%, get 26 models Blood Angels: Save 24.7%, get 21 models. It's not much, but it's still the worst deal of the power armours. If you use a lot of tacticals, you'd be better off buying a Vanilla BF and a DC box, costs a little more, but you will get more per cent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother-Captain Devlonir Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I am actually planning to buy the Battleforce because I want to make a few non-JP RAS as well as add more JP RAS and 1 squad of JP-DC. The Transport is just a small bonus for me, meaning I don't have to use my oldschool Rhino anymore as my DC Rhino. The Tacticals make great non-JP RAS if you give them chainswords, which I still have more than enough bits of. They also give a few more special weapons and an extra ML for when I'd like to play a 4 ML Devastator squad as support. For me, the Battleforce is a heaven in bits I need to add just that bit to my army I am still looking to add. Thanks for it's contents GW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lhg033 Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 lists are entertaining - nice pics of the models though loving the look of the dread and storm raven will take my custom away from gw directly though as the kits are cheaper on other sites (SR for £36ish) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.