Phalanx Warder Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 So I was looking at Rogal Dorn and his Auric Armor and having read it ~20 times I am baffled at the wording that FW used. "In addition, no attack may wound Rogal Dorn on better than 3+ regardless of its Streignth or special rules. Note Destroyer weapons attacks are unaffected" does this mean that a S10 weapon is only wounding him on a roll of a 2 or 3? Or have I lost the plot? <----- this is quite possible. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slips Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Dont worry im still confused about it too @_@ Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208359 Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ncarnadine Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Pretty sure it just means S8/9/10 is rolling to wound on 3+ rather than 2+? And I guess Fleshbane or Poison (2+) is rolling 3+ to wound as well? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208369 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black_out Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 My interpretation is that EVERYTHING aside from strength D weapons wound on 3+ Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208375 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reyner Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 My interpretation is that EVERYTHING aside from strength D weapons wound on 3+ Unless they need a higher roll right? That would be silly: Shoot Dorn with Lasguns! It's super effective! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208398 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slips Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 I initially read it as anything requiring a 2+ to wound Dorn (fleshbane, poisoned 2+, S8+) just did nothing :p Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208409 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flint13 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Pretty sure it just means S8/9/10 is rolling to wound on 3+ rather than 2+? And I guess Fleshbane or Poison (2+) is rolling 3+ to wound as well? This. WHFB had plenty of stuff worded just like this. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208425 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black_out Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 My interpretation is that EVERYTHING aside from strength D weapons wound on 3+ Unless they need a higher roll right? That would be silly: Shoot Dorn with Lasguns! It's super effective! Lol I knew they'd prove useful eventually! But yes, that's exactly how I see it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208430 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phalanx Warder Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 This might be one for Forge World, It also says that it is the same material at the big E himself so that has me thinking that it may have some funky rules. when i chop up the statement i see it like this: [no wound on better than 3+ regardless of its Streignth or special rules. Note Destroyer weapons attacks are unaffected] Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208564 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flint13 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Guys, I'm not seeing where a huge issue is coming from. The rule literally states "no weapon may wound Rogal Dorn on better than a 3+ Regardless of its strength or special rules" correct? What's better than a 3+ when you're rolling to wound? A 2+. What's worse than a 3+ when you're rolling to wound? A 4,5 or 6+. That weapon would wound Dorn on a 2+ bc of strength or special rules? Well now it wounds him on a 3+ instead. This other gun would need a 5+ to wound Dorn? Well it isn't better than a 3+, so the rule does not affect it. Hope that doesn't sound condescending, but I'm a little lost as to the confusion. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208706 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slips Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Its not that I was confused but that I initially read it in a WAY more absolute way than some of yall did. But, since Dorn doesnt have a model yet and I havent actually used him it was never a problem for me to begin with :p Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4208740 Share on other sites More sharing options...
M@verik115 Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Flint13 is correct. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4215647 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memento Of Prospero Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Here's the dummy proof version. Need a 2+ ? It's now 3+. Need a 3-4-5-6?, it stays the same. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/315376-the-auric-armour/#findComment-4223359 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.