Apostle of the 30th Host Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 Definitely! I think MKII would look epic (and work great if you go the Loyalist with Custodes route) so if you don't mind the cost, run with it! Same. Well from what little info I have read on the open day reports they are supposed to be totally different - some guy asked if there were any 'safe buys' in advance of the list and the developers said he should not by anything in advance (not even Land raiders or Rhinos) so it really seems like it's going to be nothing like it! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4526445 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Word Bearer Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 Well, that's pretty neat then! Now I just need to figure out what paints I'd need for the lenses and visors, and how to paint the visor styled helms! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4527024 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Kravin Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Sorry for the threadmancy. I'm considering Ironfire myself so doing a bit of research. I don't have my book to hand so apologies if I'm wrong but do Medusas work with Ironfire? I thought it specifically stated Barrage not Blast and that Medusas were direct fire not Barrage weapons. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4601697 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Word Bearer Posted December 23, 2016 Author Share Posted December 23, 2016 Medusas, like Basilisks, are Barrage weapons. Also, I can't think of any Barrage weapon that isn't a Blast weapon. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4601759 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Kravin Posted December 23, 2016 Share Posted December 23, 2016 Thanks. I meant Barrage was the requirement, not just Blast; not that it had to be 'Barrage not Blast' as I agree that there is no such weapon. I'm sure that at least in fluff Medusas are direct fire. Great to know though, making my choices for my Heresy army even trickier!:-) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4601807 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Word Bearer Posted December 23, 2016 Author Share Posted December 23, 2016 All Barrage weapons can direct fire except the Minotaur, they just have to be less than the minimum range. For example, having a 12" minimum range means that they don't fire barrage within 12". Hope that helps! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4601813 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Kravin Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 Thanks. I just moved house and haven't dug out all my books yet. I've just had a quick rummage and found the source of my confusion - I'm clearly getting old and befuddled as I started with the release of 2nd Ed and GW have tinkered with the rules so many times they all blur together! When the Medusa was first introduced to 40k outside of FW in the 5th Ed Guard codex (2008?) it was simply Ordnance 1, i.e. in both fluff and rules it was direct fire only. Effectively it had an assault gun role like a Vindicator, presumably to differentiate it from the Basilisk, Griffon and Colussus in that codex which were all Barrage weapons. My Heresy books are still in a box somewhere but presumably FW looked at the model and figured it made more sense to make it a Barrage weapon given the angle of fire and that change just snuck passed me! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/326639-iron-warriors-2500-ironfire/page/2/#findComment-4602140 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.