mc warhammer Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 I doubt this will be it. I’m trudging through the opening chapters. Finding it hard to focus on it. Admittedly I haven’t much reading time at the minute a few minutes each lunchtime but it’s not grabbing me. Could be the purple putting me off.... hoping it is just the purple... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919418 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 i'm hoping to find one depiction of fulgrim (other than abnett's) from BL that i can enjoy. I can't seem to recall Abnett ever writing Fulgrim himself. Sure you're not thinking of McNeill? well, abnett wrote about fulgrim in HR (which really set the expectations that i felt weren’t met by mcneill) and some brief scenes with fulgrim in PB. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919422 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izlude Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 They shipped out my LE copy. It has been a while since I read Fulgirm (HH novel), wonder if it is worth reading again. Sadly my only memory of that book was some bipolar artist's orgy.. DarKnight 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919667 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkChaplain Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 i'm hoping to find one depiction of fulgrim (other than abnett's) from BL that i can enjoy. I can't seem to recall Abnett ever writing Fulgrim himself. Sure you're not thinking of McNeill? well, abnett wrote about fulgrim in HR (which really set the expectations that i felt weren’t met by mcneill) and some brief scenes with fulgrim in PB. Fulgrim never appeared in Horus Rising. He got namedropped in a conversation between Horus and Sanguinius, regarding Fulgrim making Eidolon Lord Commander, and Eidolon being a prick. Fulgrim himself didn't appear in the series until McNeill's False Gods. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919743 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 i'm hoping to find one depiction of fulgrim (other than abnett's) from BL that i can enjoy.I can't seem to recall Abnett ever writing Fulgrim himself. Sure you're not thinking of McNeill?well, abnett wrote about fulgrim in HR (which really set the expectations that i felt weren’t met by mcneill) and some brief scenes with fulgrim in PB. Fulgrim never appeared in Horus Rising. He got namedropped in a conversation between Horus and Sanguinius, regarding Fulgrim making Eidolon Lord Commander, and Eidolon being a prick. Fulgrim himself didn't appear in the series until McNeill's False Gods. yeah...i know? i’m reading back over my post and i believe it still communicates that? i’m confused Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919749 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkChaplain Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 I was just confused that Abnett would be the one to set the baseline for a character he only tangientally mentioned in a novel, and never again afterwards iirc. The only thing Dan depicted regarding Fulgrim was that Horus was quite annoyed about his choice of commander, but that really didn't add much to the Phoenician in my eyes. Marshal Loss and JH79 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919779 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 (edited) I was just confused that Abnett would be the one to set the baseline for a character he only tangientally mentioned in a novel, and never again afterwards iirc. The only thing Dan depicted regarding Fulgrim was that Horus was quite annoyed about his choice of commander, but that really didn't add much to the Phoenician in my eyes.that might either show dan’s strength as a writer, or my susceptibility to his words. the expectation he laid out for fulgrim’s credo of perfection being one of purity and NOT arrogance and that the primarch and his legion were essentially a bipolar mix of tarvitz and lucius. instead we got someone who was totally arrogant and even less charming than lucius. even though we were constantly told fulgrim and manus were bffs, i couldn’t for the life of me see how from the text the confusion might also come from “set the baseline” being your words, not mine Edited October 29, 2017 by mc warhammer Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919780 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 I love how Scars had a latter-day Fulgrim contrasted against Sanguinius, but it's obviously a deeply unsympathetic portrayal from the Khan's POV. I want to see the more vulnerable, more idealistic Fulgrim in another book. mc warhammer 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919888 Share on other sites More sharing options...
veterannoob Posted October 29, 2017 Share Posted October 29, 2017 It's only the general author part in part 1 but part 2 or 3 will have more details 30/40K stuff from Josh. If you listen I'd recommend just skipping to 53:00 minutes and listen to Josh's interview. Robert's mic was screwed up at times but real life kept us from redoing. http://traffic.libsyn.com/combatphase/Ep_218_-_Josh_Reynolds_pt_1__When_Your_Game_Co_is_Bought.mp3 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4919906 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indefragable Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 Tangentially, for what it’s worth, I think Fulgrim is one of the best* HH novels since it covers so much ground in a single volume. When I think back, so many HH novels rely so heavily on what happened in others, but Fulgrim is self contained. Even now, years later, I remember it fondly for that reason. *im not saying it’s the best writing or story or character development or bolter porn or such. I mean that it’s one of the best HH books on my shelf because of the experience reading it JH79, Taliesin and DarKnight 3 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4921169 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandlemad Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 (edited) It's only the general author part in part 1 but part 2 or 3 will have more details 30/40K stuff from Josh. If you listen I'd recommend just skipping to 53:00 minutes and listen to Josh's interview. Robert's mic was screwed up at times but real life kept us from redoing. http://traffic.libsyn.com/combatphase/Ep_218_-_Josh_Reynolds_pt_1__When_Your_Game_Co_is_Bought.mp3 Looking forward to parts 2/3 but dang, he's refreshingly frank about the financial realities of being an author and choosing your projects. That Reynolds produced something as creative as Primogenitor shows that this aspect of professionalism (i.e. aiming for 40k works over fantasy because space marine books sell better) definitely isn't mutually exclusive with good work, if anyone still felt that way. I had assumed that he got the Fulgrim primarch novel job at least partially on the strength of his EC work around Fabius but there you go. EDIT: Also I'll second the call for thoughts, spoilers or otherwise. Not going to be reading this until the regular edition comes out in January. Edited November 1, 2017 by Sandlemad Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4921887 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indefragable Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 I’m interested in spoilers as well. Fulgrim is probably a 6/10 in interest level for me. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4922276 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 he was my favourite primarch from the IA articles, but BL's depiction of him (so far), hasn't worked with my own. and that's totally cool and fine and all that. but i'm still hoping for a fresh perspective to be added on Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4922390 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knockagh Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Going to have to eat my hat with this book. The purple is still boke and the opening chapters are slow but it’s really opening up as it moves along really enjoying it now. Not sure where he is going with Fulgrim though... mc warhammer 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4923581 Share on other sites More sharing options...
veterannoob Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 More Josh Reynolds on AoS, 30K and 40K http://traffic.libsyn.com/combatphase/ep_219_-_Josh_Reynolds_pt_2.mp3 1ncarnadine 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4923849 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellath Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 I am only 50 pages in, but it annoys me a bit that Fabius is now Terran when ADB stated he was born on Chemos in Black Legion. I didn’t read Primogenitor, thus I have no idea if his origins were discussed there, but I that is quite a slip from the editors, I reckon. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926336 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 Fluff favours him being Terran, so the slip would be AD-B's. DarkChaplain 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926398 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jareddm Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 I saw this get posted on lexicanum: "Fulgrim describes how 7 of his brothers doubted that the Emperor's Children were worthy due to their handful of legionaries when Fulgrim took over. Named only the "master of the Second," Fulgrim discusses that the "normally contemplative" brother also joined the other 6. Fulgrim also adds that he believed the brother was a hypocrite, quiet, and lacked humor" Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926621 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 Jaghatai? We have been told they "despised" each other from the start Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926651 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellath Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 “Master of the Second”. One of the lost primarchs. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926850 Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluntblade Posted November 7, 2017 Share Posted November 7, 2017 Well, in that case, that's a jolly rude way to talk about Icarion. Ranwulf, Jareddm and RikuEru 3 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4926864 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc warhammer Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 I saw this get posted on lexicanum: "Fulgrim describes how 7 of his brothers doubted that the Emperor's Children were worthy due to their handful of legionaries when Fulgrim took over. Named only the "master of the Second," Fulgrim discusses that the "normally contemplative" brother also joined the other 6. Fulgrim also adds that he believed the brother was a hypocrite, quiet, and lacked humor" weirdly, i can't see that on lexicanum's fulgrim the palatine phoenix page (incl any of its history) or on the bit about lost primarchs on the primarch page. where did you see it? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4927008 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jareddm Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 (edited) I saw this get posted on lexicanum: "Fulgrim describes how 7 of his brothers doubted that the Emperor's Children were worthy due to their handful of legionaries when Fulgrim took over. Named only the "master of the Second," Fulgrim discusses that the "normally contemplative" brother also joined the other 6. Fulgrim also adds that he believed the brother was a hypocrite, quiet, and lacked humor" weirdly, i can't see that on lexicanum's fulgrim the palatine phoenix page (incl any of its history) or on the bit about lost primarchs on the primarch page. where did you see it? It was on the missing legions page. http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Two_unknown_legions#Fulgrim:_The_Palatine_Phoenix Edited November 8, 2017 by Jareddm mc warhammer 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4927064 Share on other sites More sharing options...
b1soul Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 By now, these meaningless references to the Second or Eleventh are getting old. I think BL should reveal something a bit more substantive while of course still preseving the bulk of the mystery Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4927170 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkChaplain Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 I am only 50 pages in, but it annoys me a bit that Fabius is now Terran when ADB stated he was born on Chemos in Black Legion. I didn’t read Primogenitor, thus I have no idea if his origins were discussed there, but I that is quite a slip from the editors, I reckon. Fabius was Terran. He was trying to fix the dwindling Legion when they suffered from that odd Blight. Extinction was only avoided by reuniting with Fulgrim, but the old Terran Legionaries couldn't be fully patched-up. New recruits got lucky in that they were able to utilize newly brewed gene-seed thanks to Fulgrim's return to the fold. Fabius meanwhile is stuck with the decay of his body, to this day, which is why he cloned himself over and over to perform brain transplants and he still hasn't managed to heal his own unstable genetic code. In Chirurgeon by Nick Kyme (which was pretty good), Fabius even muses on coming to Chemos, fighting alongside the Emperor, the sons of Europa and what not. So yes, the mistake would be on AD-B's part, if it is a factual statement and not just a mistaken character, or a generalization due to Chemos being the old Legion homeworld. Either way, Fabius is one of the few remaining Terran ECs. JH79 and Sandlemad 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/336201-primarch-book-6-fulgrim/page/5/#findComment-4927240 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now