tactical objective #66 - priority orders

[uldrick]

how do you interpret that objective?

the wording is on  pg. 229 of the main rulebook.

how does that works with the following tactical objective:


43: Hold the Line (pg. 228)
i do not see how a single warlord could hold 3 objective by himself 

45: Supremacy (pg. 228)

i do not see how a single warlord could hold 3 objective by himself 

46: Domination (pg. 228)

i do not see how a single warlord could hold 6 objective by himself 

54: Area Denial (pg. 229)

how do we determine if the warlord done it be himself?

55: Psychological Warfare (pg. 229)

how do we determine if the warlord done it be himself?


i believe the RAW is severly flawed since the objective 66 is invalid with 6 out of 35 possible objectives, thats 17.14% chance that it is completly wasted and simply not possible to finish it. and that 17.14% is problematic by itself, it does not even need outside element (like absence of psykers or tank, etc) to make it useless.

am i missing something or is it designed like this to have some objectives that can never be doable in any circumstances? what do you do then?

[Frater Cornelius]

We had this discussion ad nauseum in our gaming group, to no avail. There is no logic behind it, it is simply flawed. Someone needs to ask GW this so they can include it in a FAQ. What do we do with it? Depends on who you ask. Some say draw again, some say it is impossible to achieve but you need to keep it and then discard it according to rules. No real consensus here. Just a bunch of Raging neckbeards :D

 

But I still love objective, because every time I draw it I can go "Execute Order 66" :D