tvih Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 But Crimson Fists use the rule from IF too ;P They don't have a separate super doctrine of their own, though. At least that I've heard of. If BT was intended to use the IF supplement rules, not putting them in that supplement instead of PA2 is what I'd call a doubly dick move. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/359881-clarification-on-new-dexcombat-doctrinesimp-soup/page/2/#findComment-5426813 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DranuTemplar Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 I don't think it would last (seems far too strong), but simple logic dictates we get both super doctrines if there is no listed restriction in PA2 we don't know of yet. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/359881-clarification-on-new-dexcombat-doctrinesimp-soup/page/2/#findComment-5426835 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Mattias Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 Rocking up to a game and trying to use both super doctrines based on a technicality is something you should probably save for playing "that guy" because it's pretty filthy :lol: Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/359881-clarification-on-new-dexcombat-doctrinesimp-soup/page/2/#findComment-5426999 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godspear Posted November 15, 2019 Author Share Posted November 15, 2019 Rocking up to a game and trying to use both super doctrines based on a technicality is something you should probably save for playing "that guy" because it's pretty filthy My question wasn't whether we should, but rather if we can. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/359881-clarification-on-new-dexcombat-doctrinesimp-soup/page/2/#findComment-5427306 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.