tvih Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 But Crimson Fists use the rule from IF too ;P They don't have a separate super doctrine of their own, though. At least that I've heard of. If BT was intended to use the IF supplement rules, not putting them in that supplement instead of PA2 is what I'd call a doubly dick move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DranuTemplar Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 I don't think it would last (seems far too strong), but simple logic dictates we get both super doctrines if there is no listed restriction in PA2 we don't know of yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Mattias Posted November 15, 2019 Share Posted November 15, 2019 (edited) Rocking up to a game and trying to use both super doctrines based on a technicality is something you should probably save for playing "that guy" because it's pretty filthy :lol: Edited November 15, 2019 by Marshal Mattias Godspear, tvih and Sete 3 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godspear Posted November 15, 2019 Author Share Posted November 15, 2019 Rocking up to a game and trying to use both super doctrines based on a technicality is something you should probably save for playing "that guy" because it's pretty filthy My question wasn't whether we should, but rather if we can. Marshal Mattias 1 Back to top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now