Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I like the

  Reveal hidden contents

 

and find it hilarious just how much of a shambles the traitor war effort is. Even given Horus losing his mind in canon around now, this feels like the Siege from the traitor POV is less a Siege and more just a fiasco of collective incompetence all around.

  On 1/30/2021 at 1:28 AM, Lucerne said:

I like the

  Reveal hidden contents

 

and find it hilarious just how much of a shambles the traitor war effort is. Even given Horus losing his mind in canon around now, this feels like the Siege from the traitor POV is less a Siege and more just a fiasco of collective incompetence all around.

In fairness, the idiocy seems wide and evenly spread.

 

I point you to the Khan almost getting offed by a Plague Knife, Khârn breaking physics, Magnus only now recalling that he apparently knows how to Last Jedi the established rules of Void War insetting and Dorn's entire existence save for Saturnine. To say nothing of Malc's intelligence seeming more hellbent on sabotaging himself than actively helping the war effort.

 

Heck, the Spoilers and the very premise of this book makes Beta Gamon possibly the most embarrassing military fiasco insetting and let's be honest and admit it wasn't even that bright an idea beforehand.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Thinking it further though, I do sort of think that it is a mix of needing to stretch out the Siege, follow a very specific script and the fact that the authors sometimes treat characters as tools to achieve an end does tend to result in our little pantheon of demigods coming across a bit poorly.

Edited by StrangerOrders
  On 1/29/2021 at 1:10 PM, Robbienw said:

 

  On 1/29/2021 at 11:53 AM, JH79 said:

 

  On 1/29/2021 at 11:34 AM, Robbienw said:

I’ve finished now guys, here is the last of the spoilers!

Any chance of a non spoiler review for those of us resisting the temptation? :whistling:

 

 

Its a long book and slow at the start, but well worth the read.  The titan stuff is ace, nicely written titan battling in there. It also expands key background details on certain characters and certain topics that most heresy fans will want to now.  Gives a good look into the effects of the war on the non-astartes.  Essential reading for Dark Angels fans.

 

Also, and will put this in tags because its could be considered mildy spoilerific:

 

Awesome, thank you! I read the first line of your spoiler but no further, happy to hear there's some Emperor's Children love as thus far it feel's like we haven't seen much of anything from them. Really looking forward to this book, having just re-read Solar War for the first time since it's initial release, I found myself enjoying it far more the second time around and pretty hyped for more John French goodness!

I think Mortis is a little better than The First Wall, but I was left more disappointed by it. It feels unfair to compare practically any BL book to Saturnine, but that was a masterwork of bringing together mortal and Astartes story threads, giving them the appropriate due and paying them off in ways that were both exciting and touching. Mortis has a similar scope in terms of all of the elements at play, but the prioritisation of particular threads and the brevity of others is very frustrating.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Scammel

The "the important stuff happens off-page" criticism reminds me of French's Tallarn, too, to be honest. While Executioner is still one of my top novellas in the setting, Ironclad does precisely that. All the big moments are basically relegated to short interludes more akin to history write-ups than ongoing plotlines. The focus lies elsewhere entirely.

@scammel first wall is hard to beat for being terrible because the entire premise of the book doesnt make sense. You add terrible characterization on top of that and youre left with something that feels best summarized as "the Lions gate port fell to the traitors".

 

So it's a pretty low bar imo. The next question would be if it's better than LatD, because it had some pretty good parts, but some weaker parts as well.

 

@darkchaplain we kind of always disagree on Ironclad, but imo the point of the book wasnt about the big moments.

  On 1/30/2021 at 12:51 AM, Crix said:

Not a fan of the Iron Warriors developments.

  Reveal hidden contents
  On 1/30/2021 at 4:49 PM, Marshal Rohr said:

@Ribbienw,

 

I don't suppose they mentioned a month or timeframe at all did they? I believe Saturnine was still in the summer and if this is close to the end game it would be close to Christmas.

I think the month was mentioned at the start but can’t remember what it was, will have a look back through.

Iron Warriors..

  Reveal hidden contents

Now that I've been reading Riven and Keys of Hel again, there's no mention of Crius and the rest of the Iron Hands revenants? I thought they were supposed to be summoned by Boreas, or (as he died in Solar War) by Dorn or the Fists. Seems like another plotline that was cut out from the Siege. Maybe in a novella but I don't know... It seems there's a rush to end the Heresy quickly, even leaving some major characters or plotlines without a proper ending. F'rex what about Sevatar and the rest of the Night Lords that were imprisoned by the Dark Angels? We have not heard of them since the Long Night and that was in 2014, more than six years ago. What about Alexis Polux? Where is he? Did he returned to Terra with the Blood Angels or stayed with Guilliman? Where are Crysos Morturg and Calleb Decima? Last we know of them they were going to Terra. I understand that is difficult to put every single character and plotline in 8 books or so, but there's not a single mention of any them, as if they just vanished from the galaxy. And particularly the case of Sevatar (six years ago...) is frustrating.

 

That's my problem with the Iron Warriors news. Is like they were occupaying a page limit and had to be left out so other character and plotlines could shine. But the narrative excuse seems weak. They just vanished like the rest of the characters I mentioned. I think that a 10 novels series could have solved this problem, but I guess they wanted to go to the next series of books.

Edited by Cerbero666

ADB mentioned in his AoSCoach interview he’s got the story beats laid out for Sevatar’s arc but his schedule is full at the moment. He mentioned he’s not opposed to returning to finish it.

 

 

Edit: by full I mean, several years full. He is still writing his Siege Novel, and even if he turned it in tomorrow it won’t be out before Fall.

Edited by Marshal Rohr

The biggest problem with perturabos arc is that he had two garbage appearances from Haley and Thorpe in the siege. They were so inconsistent that he might as well not have been there; coupled with his short appearance in Saturnine and he basically hasn't appeared since Solar War.

 

Now, we know that up until Solar War his arc consisted of massacaring Olympia and the self-revelation that he could never be forgiven by the emperor for that action, being betrayed and almost killed by fulgrim in his quest for ascension, trying to find a weapon to prevent betrayals from happening but still getting undermined by alpha legion and forced to abandon the project by horus, being sent into a meat grinder by horus and then told to abandon the position and waste more troops holding the ultramarines from terra while also retrieving daemon angron, making the plan to break the solar system but having his troops used as first wave fodder around Pluto. If we include the terrible siege portrayals, he also gets to see how far the corruption runs in the 4 daemon primarchs, how unreliable that makes them and how far from the beginning they've come.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

For me, it's not that Pert's actions are incredible, but more the fact that his decision takes all of two conversations in the first act of the book - after he's been rolling so high and hard for the first half of the siege, this needed to be a drawn out simmer across the entirety of a single novel. 

  On 1/31/2021 at 3:57 PM, Scammel said:

For me, it's not that Pert's actions are incredible, but more the fact that his decision takes all of two conversations in the first act of the book - after he's been rolling so high and hard for the first half of the siege, this needed to be a drawn out simmer across the entirety of a single novel.

So here's the thing, I think that (anger through a novels length) was in the brief and they tried to set it up in LatD, but Haley somehow dropped the ball when writing perturabo considering his success in Hammer of Olympia. Remember how we were all confused why he was angsty and weirdly touchy about his accomplishments not being recognized? Makes a lot more sense if it was a fumbled arc for the Mortis spoiler.

 

It sucks if that's what happened, because I tend to love French's perturabo and iron warriors. He really put a lot of work into the character and coupled with Haley's Hammer of Olympia I think we get the best primarch arc...up until it stops in LatD.

 

I honestly feel like perturabo becoming a daemon prince after the iron cage and then being spurred into action by abaddon isn't the best ending of that arc. Imo the iron cage should be him proving himself in strategy and tactics once and for all; underlining the point he made with the siege about his capabilities. He should just walk away and be bitter about past choices after, as he doesn't have anything left to prove. Becoming a daemon and then sulking is weird.

Actually, I think it makes perfect sense, when you remember that apotheosis isn’t really something you choose. Abaddon is the only one to ever “turn it down”. For everyone else, when the Gods say “it’s Princing time”, you don’t get to say “nah I’m good thanks”.

Perturabo leaving the Siege and creating the Iron Cage purely to prove the superiority of untainted, flesh-and-blood Astartes, denying the Chaos Gods, only to defeat Dorn and the Chaos Gods to say “great work, Perty, that worked just as we wished it to, here’s your reward for doing such a good job”? Yeah, that’s just proved that he was just as effected as his brothers, he just couldn’t see it. Even when trying to deny Chaos, he was doing exactly what it wanted.

 

Of course he’d sulk for 10,000 years after that. As much as I love the character, he’s petulant as hell. If, in his eyes, it was proved to him that not only was he used and discarded by both the Emperor and Horus, but that his entire life was being directed by the Chaos Hods according to their plans, and he wasn’t smart enough to see it, then his response would definitely be to essentially lock himself in his room.

I mean, it's presented as a complete choice in the case of every cult primarchs.

 

-fulgrim chose to pursue a ritual that'd turn him into a daemon

-lorgar chose to pursue a ritual that'd turn angron into a daemon

-mortarion was given a choice with the destroyer plague

-Magnus is kind of the outlier in that he was always kind of more daemonic/psychic in nature than human. He got shattered and the ritual to get away from Prospero discarded his physical form.

 

Point being, people usually have to put in the effort explicitly to turn into a daemon prince/equivalent. Abaddon refusing gifts, Bile's refusal to even consider daemons a thing, the whole "armour of contempt" concept that gets seen in abnett's works; if you really don't want chaos, then you won't get warped by its power.

  On 1/31/2021 at 7:56 PM, SkimaskMohawk said:

I mean, it's presented as a complete choice in the case of every cult primarchs.

 

-fulgrim chose to pursue a ritual that'd turn him into a daemon

-lorgar chose to pursue a ritual that'd turn angron into a daemon

-mortarion was given a choice with the destroyer plague

-Magnus is kind of the outlier in that he was always kind of more daemonic/psychic in nature than human. He got shattered and the ritual to get away from Prospero discarded his physical form.

 

Point being, people usually have to put in the effort explicitly to turn into a daemon prince/equivalent. Abaddon refusing gifts, Bile's refusal to even consider daemons a thing, the whole "armour of contempt" concept that gets seen in abnett's works; if you really don't want chaos, then you won't get warped by its power.

As a counterargument, I’d point to the Night Lords in Talos’ warband, or the gradual corruption of the other Iron Warriors over the course of the Heresy. You don’t have to explicitly worship, or even accept Chaos, to be changed by it.

 

I could see Perturabo’s “ascension” being akin to Mortarions, not really a “proud” moment at all, or really even a choice, but rather at the moment when the Gods reveal that everything he’s done has been to their plan, so he may as well give in.

I mean, Mortarions options weren’t really a choice there. He had to pick between eternal servitude to the forces he hates, or spend eternity watching his Legion suffer in undying agony.

 

Edit: And yes, what Angron/Lorgar/Fulgrim did weren’t “choices” in that they could turn it down, just that the situation was deliberately created. They made the respective gods sit up and take notice of them, rewarding them for their work. That’s not showing them rejecting Chaos but getting it anyway. We’re repeatedly told that the special thing in Abaddons relationship with Chaos is that he’s capable of telling them no without getting spawned, that’s kinda ruined if it becomes “oh, you can totally do it, you just have to be a strict atheist”.

Edited by Lord_Caerolion

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.