Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm wondering, if new possessed models make them more like the now greater possessed, and with the speed boost, a unit of them running with a demon prince might be cool

I think they will be a really vicious unit in any army that can protect them turn 1 for delivery turn 2. The unit size of max 10 seems strange given the punching power but it's the first time I've looked at possesed and seriously rated them. My night lords will have a unit though I may proxy something for them -3ld will mean I get the +1 to wound vs most things which is terrifying. 

 

@Toldavf DG has the new Defiler since their 9th Edition codex. It's cool.

Ha so it does.

 

How is the new chaos codex performing in play tests?

I don’t believe anyone in this thread has access to the play test rules, or points.

 

Some, however, such as Iron Inspirit and Montfort have been sliding some elements of it into their lists, which while imperfect, gives some impression as to judging what difference the rules might make on the table top.

 

The proof in the pudding will be the eating, of course, but until then at least some members have been trying to have a more informed speculation. :smile.:

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come.  Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt.  As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

Edited by Dr_Ruminahui

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come.  Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt.  As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

 

Would be sad to learn the rumors are an elaborate troll.

 

We should be discussing the possibility ClockworkChris is not on the level. His last post indicated he's coordinating the timing of the rumors with his source.

 

If you had access to an upcoming rules release, would you hold back? Drip feed them to the community?

 

Most of the leaks I've seen are a firehose, not a sprinkler. Something about this is off.

 

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come.  Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt.  As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

 

Would be sad to learn the rumors are an elaborate troll.

 

We should be discussing the possibility ClockworkChris is not on the level. His last post indicated he's coordinating the timing of the rumors with his source.

 

If you had access to an upcoming rules release, would you hold back? Drip feed them to the community?

 

Most of the leaks I've seen are a firehose, not a sprinkler. Something about this is off.

 

I would if my source was in danger of being discovered, don't forget they all sign NDA's I know that from my own play test experience so there would be real world consequences for any leakers that are found. 

 

 

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come. Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt. As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

Would be sad to learn the rumors are an elaborate troll.

 

We should be discussing the possibility ClockworkChris is not on the level. His last post indicated he's coordinating the timing of the rumors with his source.

 

If you had access to an upcoming rules release, would you hold back? Drip feed them to the community?

 

Most of the leaks I've seen are a firehose, not a sprinkler. Something about this is off.

He's been right so far and unless you have proof he's trolling, I wouldn't throw shade

 

 

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come. Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt. As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

Would be sad to learn the rumors are an elaborate troll.

 

We should be discussing the possibility ClockworkChris is not on the level. His last post indicated he's coordinating the timing of the rumors with his source.

 

If you had access to an upcoming rules release, would you hold back? Drip feed them to the community?

 

Most of the leaks I've seen are a firehose, not a sprinkler. Something about this is off.

I was sceptical too, until the CSM squad stuff was confirmed when the KT Legionaries were announced weeks later.

Gonna say it again, I am legit a nobody just happened to discover a playtester in the wild like a shiny pokemon. And im just sharing what i got.

 

From day one i havent hid that i cannot vouch for these just that my source has now close to 7 months of 100% accuracy. Apart from that these are rumours and your treat them as such.

 

I ask questions, he answers them if he feels like it. Now james workshop seems to get pissy since 75% of a codex that is suppose to to come out in 2 months are all over the web. What do you think our humble benefactors going to do?

 

Tldr

This is a rumour thread talking about rumours and even myself are treating these as rumours, hoping they are somewhat true.i dont have to share these and will stop sharing these if my person of someone elses character is put into question (ie iron inspirit) this is a rumour thread so let talk about the rumours and the facts before us.

If you want to to start a rumour sceptic thread you can do it in another thread with blackjack and hookers for all i care.

Dude, I'm good with what you've done so far..., I'll still take the hookers and blow though, if they're on offer :biggrin.:

Infighting and warp dust, you know you’re in Chaosville. ;)

 

I encourage anyone interested to give these rumored rules a try, and discuss your results. What else is there to do right now? Objectively, we can’t say they’re the real rules but when those are finally in our hot little hands we can see for ourselves and do it all over again.

 

Hello all,

Just to keep you guys updated. Like some of of you have noticed ive been rather quiet during the past week and that because i've been rocking the boat a bit much and the eye of sauron is on the lookout.

So for right now I am staying quiet while things cool down and hopefully some other people validate my carefully curated wall of text.

However that doesnt mean im not collecting info. Once my source gives me the signal i will have a floodgate of info to share, and from what I have learnt today, its fracking lit.

Keep dabbing to the dank gods

Clockworkchris

 

So pacing yourself then?. We still have plenty to discuss while you go hide in the eye of terror for a bit.

What are peoples opinions on what the defiler should look like in the new dex? naturally the battle cannon should go up to damage 3, should its indirect fire return? should its auto cannons get a buff or change?, how potent in melee should it be? and can we get a less ugly model for it please?.

Defiler battle cannon should be 2d3 (blast) shoots on visible targets and d6 vs non visible targets (no blast).

The reaper autocannon should be a different weapon, its huge when you compare it to the Terminatos variant.

Claws should be 3+d3 damage.

Defiler should be 160 points max

 

 

 

That said, Khornestar is correct - these are not playtest rules, but rather are rumours gleaned from wherever they may have come. Take them with a grain (or a bucket, if that is your want) of salt. As of yet, no one here has indicated they are part of any play test or posted anything about such.

Would be sad to learn the rumors are an elaborate troll.

 

We should be discussing the possibility ClockworkChris is not on the level. His last post indicated he's coordinating the timing of the rumors with his source.

 

If you had access to an upcoming rules release, would you hold back? Drip feed them to the community?

 

Most of the leaks I've seen are a firehose, not a sprinkler. Something about this is off.

 This is literally what happened with all the Eldar rumors (they made an advent calendar of rumors) and those turned out to be 100% true. Whoever these leakers are, this seems to be their style.

Edited by KalmDown

Trying to figure out where a master of possession fits in, other then trying to footslog up the board, but possessed seem faster and other daemonkin will probaly deepstrike, maybe 5 possessed and a mop in a rhino if they buff the capacity

Might be good buffing obliterators.

 

If he is in a termite he will have better position to buff the demon kin units. 

Trying to figure out where a master of possession fits in, other then trying to footslog up the board, but possessed seem faster and other daemonkin will probaly deepstrike, maybe 5 possessed and a mop in a rhino if they buff the capacity

I've been using him as a buffer to oblits/demonengines so far, I doubt that will change much for me at least. By himself he's not anything special, he gets better the better stuff he can buff.

 

 

Trying to figure out where a master of possession fits in, other then trying to footslog up the board, but possessed seem faster and other daemonkin will probaly deepstrike, maybe 5 possessed and a mop in a rhino if they buff the capacity

Might be good buffing obliterators.

 

If he is in a termite he will have better position to buff the demon kin units.

Maybe I shoot myself in the foot but I'm not too much a fan of forgeworld

 

Also, it looks like he might not be able to buff the engines anymore

Edited by danodan123
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.