Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Eh, as long as we’re just discussing the model there’s no issue here AFAIC. Things snowball at News & Rumors into off topic train wrecks rather quickly. We have nothing suggesting it’s got a 40k datasheet yet, so nothing beyond the mini to comment on beyond guesses/speculation. Edited by Khornestar

Is it just me or are the armor panels on the Daemon Prince vaguely power armor-esque? Not as clearlyhigh-fantasy as I would have thought. And the article does mention there is more than meets the eye with this model... maybe it will be for 40k, as well?

The current plastic prince has vaguely csmesque armor as well, with alternate marine shoulder pads and backpack vents you can use instead of the wings for a more distinctly 40k option. I expect this model will be the same. Honestly I like it, but not enough to replace my old 3rd edition metal prince.

Yeah, they were quite confusing on that, said no AoS statements, but even statements on their publications in the context of 40k counted somehow. Would've been so much easier if they just said 'don't talk about the Daemon prince' rather than the generic 'don't talk about AoS.' But it's not worth bothering further about, so I digress.

 

I'd expect this one is like Be'lakor, so a kit for both systems. I'm hoping the cover art shown for our Codex means we'll get a new Chaos Lord, we really need one of those.

I'd much prefer a dedicated 40k DP kit to one that functions in both systems. The classic Juan Diaz model works so brilliantly because every part - from its power armoured boots to its backpack - has been sculpted to look like it was a Chaos Space Marine that has ascended. The current one, age aside, looks far more superficial because you're just plonking a handful of 40k-specific components on top of a daemon.

 

GW didn't explicitly go "hey look this can be used in both settings!" like they usually do, so you never know. I would have expected them to highlight that usability/those options. If there are 40k-specific components in the kit, I hope they live up to the Diaz DP's quality. But I'll be crossing my fingers, however unlikely, for a dedicated 40k DP kit at some point down the road.

GW didn't explicitly go "hey look this can be used in both settings!" like they usually do, so you never know. I would have expected them to highlight that usability/those options.

No, but the line in the article "There’s more to this miniature than meets the eye, but you’ll have to stay tuned to Warhammer Community next week for more information" amounts to this:

gallery_84244_11417_135628.jpg

They also said when someone asked them a direct question on whether it was also for 40k - 'wait and see', which they'd've obviously just said no if not.

 

Nah not necessarily, "wait and see" and "we'll tell you know when we know more" is the community team's sacred motto.

 

 

GW didn't explicitly go "hey look this can be used in both settings!" like they usually do, so you never know. I would have expected them to highlight that usability/those options. 

 

No, but the line in the article "There’s more to this miniature than meets the eye, but you’ll have to stay tuned to Warhammer Community next week for more information" amounts to this:

 

Maybe, but again not necessarily; that could just refer to a wide variety of options, none of them 40k (e.g. we know from the AOS leaks there may be a named Daemon Prince character, presumably built out of the same kit if so: it could be referring to that).

 

No doubt we'll see next week. My hopes are probably in vain but it is by no means cut & dry based on what we've seen/been told today

Edited by Marshal Loss
This one looks pretty cool, I certainly like it better than the plastic kit which always left me pretty cold. But I have to agree with those who posted above, the metal daemon prince by Juan Diaz is the high water mark of daemon prince models for my tastes.

We better get a model like the guy on the front of the codex or a quick errata like the eldar got. I want a new lord model the guys from blackstone fortress is boring and unhelmeted.

A new multipart PA Chaos Lord model of the quality that Eldar got with the Autarch/Sisters got with the Canoness etc is my absolute dream right now

We better get a model like the guy on the front of the codex or a quick errata like the eldar got. I want a new lord model the guys from blackstone fortress is boring and unhelmeted.

Sounded like Clockworkchris said the default loadout is thunder hammer but he still had access to other melee weapons. If this one datasheet in particular works the same way he does now he’d be able to trade the pistol/hammer out to make this loadout usable. Doesn’t mean it will work that way at all in the new dex, though.

So, that's a hard pass on that Daemon Prince model for me.  Looking at the codex cover leak if its a fake its a good one. 

It would of made sense for them to give it the avatar treatment and let players have options. Oh well another missed opportunity. 

I noticed Raptors/Warp Talons new updates weapon profiles on their instructions while searching the interwebs today. It's confirmed those kits are not getting updated yet. Which, I'm not very surprised over. I believe they came out in 2012? That really isn't that long ago compared to other kits in the game and I'm sure GW is going to try and get as much money as they can out of a kit before replacing them. IMO they aren't even bad looking models. I do wish it was easier to get their jump packs onto the new bodies, though..

 

I'd much prefer a dedicated 40k DP kit to one that functions in both systems. The classic Juan Diaz model works so brilliantly because every part - from its power armoured boots to its backpack - has been sculpted to look like it was a Chaos Space Marine that has ascended. The current one, age aside, looks far more superficial because you're just plonking a handful of 40k-specific components on top of a daemon.

 

GW didn't explicitly go "hey look this can be used in both settings!" like they usually do, so you never know. I would have expected them to highlight that usability/those options. If there are 40k-specific components in the kit, I hope they live up to the Diaz DP's quality. But I'll be crossing my fingers, however unlikely, for a dedicated 40k DP kit at some point down the road.

 

1st point, absolutely agreed. Wish I had picked up one of those models back in the day. 

 

2nd point, I went back and watched the CSM adepticon preview on WC and the (pre-summed) Daemon Prince wing we get a glimpse of is very different from the one on this AoS Daemon Prince. I would suspect you are probably right and we'll wind up having a 40k specific DP. I'm honestly a little unsure on how I feel about that. I mean, they were able to do both with Belakor and put that in the same box.. why separate the Daemon Princes? I'm sure it winds up being a cost saving thing for GW to just include extra bits on a sprue to make the DPs for both.

There is of course the possibility that glimpse we get is not a daemon prince at all.. however, who could it be? We already have Belakor.. I HIGHLY doubt is Angron or Fulgrim.. 

Edited by Bloody Legionnaire
Of course you will be able to use it for both its literally a daemon, I have an entire nurgle army with nothing that picks it out specifically of being either for 40k or aos and I just built most of them exactly how they come in the box I don't really see why it needs a specific bit on it to make it usable or either system just glue a space marine head onto it and boom its a 40k model

I noticed Raptors/Warp Talons new updates weapon profiles on their instructions while searching the interwebs today. It's confirmed those kits are not getting updated yet. Which, I'm not very surprised over. I believe they came out in 2012? That really isn't that long ago compared to other kits in the game and I'm sure GW is going to try and get as much money as they can out of a kit before replacing them. IMO they aren't even bad looking models. I do wish it was easier to get their jump packs onto the new bodies, though..

 

 

I'd much prefer a dedicated 40k DP kit to one that functions in both systems. The classic Juan Diaz model works so brilliantly because every part - from its power armoured boots to its backpack - has been sculpted to look like it was a Chaos Space Marine that has ascended. The current one, age aside, looks far more superficial because you're just plonking a handful of 40k-specific components on top of a daemon.

 

GW didn't explicitly go "hey look this can be used in both settings!" like they usually do, so you never know. I would have expected them to highlight that usability/those options. If there are 40k-specific components in the kit, I hope they live up to the Diaz DP's quality. But I'll be crossing my fingers, however unlikely, for a dedicated 40k DP kit at some point down the road.

1st point, absolutely agreed. Wish I had picked up one of those models back in the day.

 

2nd point, I went back and watched the CSM adepticon preview on WC and the (pre-summed) Daemon Prince wing we get a glimpse of is very different from the one on this AoS Daemon Prince. I would suspect you are probably right and we'll wind up having a 40k specific DP. I'm honestly a little unsure on how I feel about that. I mean, they were able to do both with Belakor and put that in the same box.. why separate the Daemon Princes? I'm sure it winds up being a cost saving thing for GW to just include extra bits on a sprue to make the DPs for both.

 

There is of course the possibility that glimpse we get is not a daemon prince at all.. however, who could it be? We already have Belakor.. I HIGHLY doubt is Angron or Fulgrim..

Pretty sure the preview wing was possessed.

 

unknown.png

 

From a Twitter post

Something seems off with that photo. Might just be the angle but it seems a little flat and the possible lack of shadow is annoying me

 

 

Can't make out most of what is there from this image. Are those rebreathers at the bottom? Is that a Raptor on the right? Why is the central figure wielding 2 hand weapons?

 

Yes, something seems off.

I'm pretty sure that's a legitimate cover. It's the full art of a piece GW used part of in the recent article about Chaos Legionaries. They haven't shown the full artwork yet so there's nowhere for a faker to have copied it from.

 

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2022/04/18/two-wounds-are-only-the-beginning-for-chaos-space-marine-legionaries/

I'm pretty sure that's a legitimate cover. It's the full art of a piece GW used part of in the recent article about Chaos Legionaries. They haven't shown the full artwork yet so there's nowhere for a faker to have copied it from.

 

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2022/04/18/two-wounds-are-only-the-beginning-for-chaos-space-marine-legionaries/

Agreed. It's likely more that the background image has been changed/camoflaged to hide something identifying. It certainly looks to me like it could be legit, so I'm gonna jump in the "yay a codex" camp.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.