darkseren1ty Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 I really hope these automata are different enough from wardogs that warrants me taking them over a pair of brigands or huntsmen. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6101055 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWarmaster Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 What we need is for GW to go back to making squads in multiples of 5/10 etc. I haaaate these 3 man squads they’ve been doing more and more of! I’d also like to see more granular points and load outs like we used to have. No more ‘power levels’ where load outs didn’t affect cost etc. I miss the 3rd-6th edition golden era haha. I’ve not enjoyed 40K anywhere near as much since like 7th. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6101064 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Praetorian of Inwit Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Definitely. I think Squads of 3 is very awkward. Wouldn't be surprised if it's GW's form of 'shrinkflation'. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6101440 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahzek451 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 The new t.sons bots are gorgeous...and....shameless plug...i called it! Lol LSM 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6101819 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenith Posted Monday at 12:11 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:11 PM I've split the discussion on the Sekhetar robots revealed at Adepticon into a separate topic - this is for general state of the faction discussion, while the amount of comments were worthy of it's own topic. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6102908 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Praetorian of Inwit Posted Thursday at 02:59 PM Share Posted Thursday at 02:59 PM So we're looking at the following datasheets most likely: Ahriman Ahriman on Disc Exalted Sorcerer Exalted Sorcerer on Disc Daemon Prince Daemon Prince with Wings Sorcerer in Terminator Armour Infernal Master Magnus the Red and his most impressive nipple horns Rubric Marines Scarab Occult Terminators Tzaangors Tzaangors on Discs Flamers Screamers Pink Horrors Blue Horrors Lord of Change Kairos Fateweaver Chaos Rhino Chaos Land Raider Forgefiend or Maulerfiend Heldrake New Robots No reason why TS (and DG/WE for that matter) won't get the EC treatment so I think it's safe to say the Helbrute, Defiler, Vindicator, Predator, Cultists and generic Sorcerer will be gone along with one of the fiends. I wouldn't be surprised to see the fancier Tzaangors on foot go. The Mutalith is an interesting one. It is an AoS model at the end of the day and there seems to be a clear internal clash going on whereby scumbag accountants or middle managers don't want models shared. So I could see this being pulled. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103493 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Ruminahui Posted Thursday at 03:14 PM Share Posted Thursday at 03:14 PM I don't see you losing cultists unless you gain a replacement unit with sticky objectives. So, if TS lose cultists, I would expect them either to get a new unit with that rule, or have a datasheet change on an existing unit to give it to them. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103505 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Praetorian of Inwit Posted Thursday at 04:13 PM Share Posted Thursday at 04:13 PM That sounds like a job for Tzaangors or Rubrics. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103529 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahzek451 Posted Thursday at 04:21 PM Share Posted Thursday at 04:21 PM (edited) Don't forget spawn. I'm not even sure what to speculate on until GW drops the # of datasheets for the codex. I think they didn't mention a number yet. The part that bugs me a bit, as daemons are confirmed to be an index this edition, and their fate as an army being very shakey in the future......I do wonder why GW doesn't bother throwing the rest in? I.e. heralds, characters, chariots. Edited Thursday at 04:22 PM by Ahzek451 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103531 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Praetorian of Inwit Posted Thursday at 04:38 PM Share Posted Thursday at 04:38 PM (edited) I wouldn't be surprised if long term GW want separate Daemon ranges for AoS and 40k. There is an incredibly idiotic and sociopathic obsession inside GW as regards shared units. We can see they are slowly but surely removing anything shared between systems and even between codexs (space marines aside). However I think different Daemon ranges for 40k and AoS would actually be a good thing in theory. How Plaguebearers look in AoS could be very different to how they would look in 40k and it would open things up not only to unique aesthetics for each system but wargear and tactical roles. Honestly I think all the Daemons that don't get into the codexs will go to Legends in 11th for 40k. @Ahzek451 I'm always forgetting Spawn! Good shout, they could get that role too. Edited Thursday at 04:39 PM by The Praetorian of Inwit Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103534 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Praetorian of Inwit Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM Share Posted Thursday at 04:42 PM Perhaps another reason could be that putting all the Daemon units makes things too difficult for the writers to balance things out, both internally and also externally as not all the Daemon ranges are equal in what's available. Possibly as well they were worried that if TS and WE had more Daemon units than Legion units it would draw further criticisms over the lack of support for these factions. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103535 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahzek451 Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM Share Posted Thursday at 05:30 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, The Praetorian of Inwit said: However I think different Daemon ranges for 40k and AoS would actually be a good thing in theory. How Plaguebearers look in AoS could be very different to how they would look in 40k and it would open things up not only to unique aesthetics for each system but wargear and tactical roles. Its funny you say that, I've always somewhat jokingly thought to myself that I wouldn't put it past GW to one day go the DOOM route and do cyberdaemon shenanigans. Something akin to soulgrinders as far as part machine/part daemon. But when it comes to that, your either a daemon contained in a mechanical shell (like maulerfiends/forgefiends/heldrakes/etc.) or your a daemon with cyber implants/add-ons. Obviously more the latter. Edited Thursday at 05:49 PM by Ahzek451 Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/376402-what-do-we-need-in-10ed/page/6/#findComment-6103546 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now