Toxichobbit Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM 1 hour ago, Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla said: Is it though? Let's assume that your interpratation that Prima Materis is not a real priestess and the Frateris bodyguards are not real Frateris is correct. She is the one, who in this group should be masquerading with priestly outfit, not her henchmen, if they are trying to fool the masses. I also have hard time imagining how a not so powerfull noble house could enjoy such good relations with the Ecclesiarchy (they are effectively glued to it) if its members were parading in public dressed up in full priesthood regalia, not only pretending to be members of Adeptus Ministorum but also giving the whole garb to some nobodies. My interpretation is not that the Prima Materis is not a "real priestess" (whatever that means) - I own House of Faith, I know what she is. Given that you have already assumed what my interpretation is and got it wrong, I think it's best if we stop assuming and deal with facts. The Prima Materis is a "real" priestess - she performs rituals, prayers and blessings. But she is also an agent and enforcer of House Ko'iron. So there is no "masquerading", she is not "pretending to be a member of the Adeptus Ministorum". She is a priestess, she's just not an Ecclesiarchal priestess. The Frateris bodyguards are veterans of Wars of Faith and bodyguards of an important member of one of the seven great Houses of Necromunda. However, they are not priests or members of the Ecclesiarchy. To expand upon my first post as to why it's important that these are members of House Ko'iron rather than the Ecclesiarchy - House Ko'iron has survived thousands of years (not an easy feat on Necromunda), has strong ties to the Ecclesiarchy and the Sororitas and has access to Ecclesiarchy relics. They're one of the seven great Houses of Necromuda. They have held on to their position for so long because of their faith and because they have connections with both the Ecclesiarchy and the Sororitas. It makes perfect sense that they would be using as much religious splendour as possible when they are out among the masses, because their very existence is maintained by their position as the most faithful Noble House and the most visible official representatives of the God Emperor on Necromunda. They may not be the Ecclesiarchy, but they have it's backing and from a faithful Underhiver's perspective (and bare in mind that these models are representing members of the House going into the underhive), they are the same thing. Finally, the crux of your argument seems to be (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that the Ecclesiarchy will take issue with them wearing mitres and other priestly regalia. Where does this assumption come from? I have never seen any lore stating that only the Ecclesiarchy can wear priestly regalia and that the Ecclesiarchy has a problem with anybody else dressed like that. I have, however, seen evidence to the contrary. Astartes Chapters wearing priestly regalia (robes, censors, rosarius etc) and the Mechanicus are often dressed as priests (though they do have a distinct style and are obviously priests of a different religion) - so the Ecclesiarchy doesn't have the monopoly on priestly regalia. But most importantly, the Redemption have been dressing as priests, including wearing mitres, as far back as 1995. They're an independent (i.e. not Ecclesiarchal), outlawed Cult that's part of House Cawdor, mostly made up of zealous underhivers. And yet the Ecclesiarchy is fine with them wearing all the priestly regalia they want - as evidenced because the Ecclesiarchy has no issues with the Redemption joining them for Wars of Faith and Crusades. If the Ecclesiarchy was going to have a problem with other people wearing big hats, then they'd for sure have a problem with the outlawed cult of zealots before they had a problem with a powerful Noble House on one of the most important worlds in the Imperium. From the perspective of House Ko'iron, it makes perfect sense that they would have any visible members wearing as much priestly regalia as possible. And from the perspective of the Ecclesiarchy, given their tolerance of other organisations religious trappings and their acceptance of the Redemption, they don't seem to care either way. SvenIronhand, Dalmyth, Petitioner's City and 8 others 10 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384885-ko%E2%80%99iron-ministorum-delegation/page/2/#findComment-6082667 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanofAngels Posted yesterday at 07:21 AM Share Posted yesterday at 07:21 AM 18 hours ago, Joe said: WarCom Article. It's Christmas time, so obviously time for church. I wasn't expecting a 40k Emperor model so soon! Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384885-ko%E2%80%99iron-ministorum-delegation/page/2/#findComment-6082691 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah_of_Rock_n_Rolla Posted yesterday at 10:32 AM Share Posted yesterday at 10:32 AM 8 hours ago, Toxichobbit said: My interpretation is not that the Prima Materis is not a "real priestess" (whatever that means) - I own House of Faith, I know what she is. Given that you have already assumed what my interpretation is and got it wrong, I think it's best if we stop assuming and deal with facts. The Prima Materis is a "real" priestess - she performs rituals, prayers and blessings. But she is also an agent and enforcer of House Ko'iron. So there is no "masquerading", she is not "pretending to be a member of the Adeptus Ministorum". She is a priestess, she's just not an Ecclesiarchal priestess. The Frateris bodyguards are veterans of Wars of Faith and bodyguards of an important member of one of the seven great Houses of Necromunda. However, they are not priests or members of the Ecclesiarchy. To expand upon my first post as to why it's important that these are members of House Ko'iron rather than the Ecclesiarchy - House Ko'iron has survived thousands of years (not an easy feat on Necromunda), has strong ties to the Ecclesiarchy and the Sororitas and has access to Ecclesiarchy relics. They're one of the seven great Houses of Necromuda. They have held on to their position for so long because of their faith and because they have connections with both the Ecclesiarchy and the Sororitas. It makes perfect sense that they would be using as much religious splendour as possible when they are out among the masses, because their very existence is maintained by their position as the most faithful Noble House and the most visible official representatives of the God Emperor on Necromunda. They may not be the Ecclesiarchy, but they have it's backing and from a faithful Underhiver's perspective (and bare in mind that these models are representing members of the House going into the underhive), they are the same thing. Finally, the crux of your argument seems to be (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that the Ecclesiarchy will take issue with them wearing mitres and other priestly regalia. Where does this assumption come from? I have never seen any lore stating that only the Ecclesiarchy can wear priestly regalia and that the Ecclesiarchy has a problem with anybody else dressed like that. I have, however, seen evidence to the contrary. Astartes Chapters wearing priestly regalia (robes, censors, rosarius etc) and the Mechanicus are often dressed as priests (though they do have a distinct style and are obviously priests of a different religion) - so the Ecclesiarchy doesn't have the monopoly on priestly regalia. But most importantly, the Redemption have been dressing as priests, including wearing mitres, as far back as 1995. They're an independent (i.e. not Ecclesiarchal), outlawed Cult that's part of House Cawdor, mostly made up of zealous underhivers. And yet the Ecclesiarchy is fine with them wearing all the priestly regalia they want - as evidenced because the Ecclesiarchy has no issues with the Redemption joining them for Wars of Faith and Crusades. If the Ecclesiarchy was going to have a problem with other people wearing big hats, then they'd for sure have a problem with the outlawed cult of zealots before they had a problem with a powerful Noble House on one of the most important worlds in the Imperium. From the perspective of House Ko'iron, it makes perfect sense that they would have any visible members wearing as much priestly regalia as possible. And from the perspective of the Ecclesiarchy, given their tolerance of other organisations religious trappings and their acceptance of the Redemption, they don't seem to care either way. OK, so let me recapitulate your argument and please correct me if I am wrong: We have a group called "Ministorum delegation" led by a priestess of the Empreror wearing the symbol of the Ecclesiarchy and accompanied by (ex-?)members of Frateris militia and this group is neither an official Ministorum delegation nor is pretending to be one? Fair enough. Indeed I have no sources stating that Ecclesiarchy discoursages wearing priestly regalia and symbols of the Ministorum while calling yourself Ministorum. I even concede that Ministorum symbol in itself is also a devotional symbol. But what about the name Ministorum refering exclusively to the Ecclesiarchy in the Book of Faith? I'm not gonna argue whether old redemptorist miniatures had mitres or stylized caps, never had one in my hand. I don't remember saying that Ministorum are the only priests out there. I said that only priests should be dressed like priests and it makes no sense to dress like a priest someone who is not one in a group with a priest (and I said that people calling themselves Ministorum, dressing like Ministorum (or pirests if you like) and wearing Ministorum symbols while not being Ministorum are pretending to be Ministorum). Especially by people who both are very devout and are connected with the Ecclesiarchy, so are not ones to use those symbols lightly. And house Ko'iron is not pretending to be religious. I don't recall anythin in the Book of Faith implying that Ko'iron is " the most visible official representatives of the God Emperor on Necromunda" and "they have it's backing and from a faithful Underhiver's perspective they are the same thing". I don't understand why Astartes Chaplains would collide with Ministorum, considering that rosarius is used by Astartes speciffically as the symbol of the official ecclesiastic sanction granted to them by the Ecclesiarchy. Redemption was nearly excommunicated and Redemtionist are outlaws, so saying that Ecclesiarchy has no issues with them is weird to me. SvenIronhand 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384885-ko%E2%80%99iron-ministorum-delegation/page/2/#findComment-6082731 Share on other sites More sharing options...
gideon stargreave Posted yesterday at 12:32 PM Share Posted yesterday at 12:32 PM Almost the whole imperium operates as a sort of cargo cult. The most obvious example is how the mechanicus is presented, or rather how the general population feel about them. However there are tonnes of little bits of fluff where imperial citizens (or denizens) own things that have power but don’t know why they have power. I’d say that a powerful noble having bodyguards that fetishize wider symbols of authority/ holiness/ mystery is no surprise at all on the setting. I’m sure that on a thousand worlds people worship bits of a started armour/ ape their style and more. So why not these. Excellent minis Ramell, Antarius and Oxydo 3 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/384885-ko%E2%80%99iron-ministorum-delegation/page/2/#findComment-6082770 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now