Sete Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 5 minutes ago, Chapter Master Valrak said: I’ve said it for the last few months, like I said, I heard it was multiple release. It could be two, three, four or five models. i know it’s definitely two for now :) That's what I like to hear. I'll bet the cover dude is the Judiciar, the special chaplain. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117287 Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSM Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 5 hours ago, Chapter Master Valrak said: I’ve said it for the last few months, like I said, I heard it was multiple release. It could be two, three, four or five models. i know it’s definitely two for now :) All with the Codex, or might some stuff be separated out and come with the end-of-edition narrative campaign? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117366 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorn of War Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) On 6/19/2025 at 10:55 AM, Chapter Master Valrak said: I’ve said it for the last few months, like I said, I heard it was multiple release. It could be two, three, four or five models. i know it’s definitely two for now :) I love the model that's been shown. The best Chapter in the Imperium just got a little better. Praise be to the God Emperor that there are even more minis on the horizon. The Codex art is not great. The artist (be they human or AI) has an odd notion of perspective and the proportions of the human body. Now that Cathay is going on pre-order at the weekend, what is remaining that we know about? (1) Heresy 3.0, (2) Space Wolves full launch and characters, (3) Templars, (4) Grey Knights, (5) drop pods (6) Imperial Knights (delayed), (7) SM Codex 2.0. Surely the Templars can't be that far away now? Edited June 20 by Dorn of War Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117481 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sete Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 (edited) Valrak is whispering sweet little lies about an Execrator. "Execrator" can refer to someone who curses or denounces. I'll go with the dude in the cover. So it's like a librarian but instead of warp he just says mean things. Edited June 20 by Sete Cenobite Terminator 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117581 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Reinhard Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 It's also the way of the Templars to dismantle the foe through sheer force of verbal disdain Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117584 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadlessCross Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 52 minutes ago, Sete said: So it's like a librarian but instead of warp he just says mean things. Gotta call my ex girlfriend and let her know she's gonna be a 40k character LightningClawLeonard, CastellanDeMolay, StrangerOrders and 13 others 16 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117585 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Clausel Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 (edited) 1 hour ago, Sete said: "Execrator" Hate to be that guy but i think its Excoriator. Had to look it up my self. Valrak sometimes mispronounces words very badly(which is totally fine). But i love the idea of a "reverse" Chaplain screaming curses and stuff. Can only imagine the fun and banter you can have at the table with it! Edited June 20 by Sir Clausel Aarik, HolyPestilience, LSM and 2 others 4 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117586 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nephaston Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Sir Clausel said: Valrak sometimes mispronounces words very badly(which is totally fine). I think he does that thing where he tries to guess the word by the shape, despite him never encountering it before, instead of sounding it out. Edited June 20 by Nephaston Cenobite Terminator, Sir Clausel and Marshal Rohr 1 1 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117590 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Knight Posted June 20 Share Posted June 20 I'm very late to the party. The new model looks great. I've seen some complaints about poses being re-used, but that's not an issue for me in this case. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117612 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorn of War Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 (edited) 8 hours ago, Sir Clausel said: Hate to be that guy but i think its Excoriator. Had to look it up my self. Valrak sometimes mispronounces words very badly(which is totally fine). But i love the idea of a "reverse" Chaplain screaming curses and stuff. Can only imagine the fun and banter you can have at the table with it! I was thinking the same thing myself, as this would make a lot more sense. Funny thing though is that there is an Imperial Fist successor chapter called The Excoriators. Edited June 21 by Dorn of War Sir Clausel 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117644 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Reinhard Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 A chapter with a diss so powerful they were named for it. On a more serious note there are so many chapters and so many units now that there's bound to be overlap Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117660 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alternis Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Are we sure the name isn’t Executor Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117683 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Reinhard Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Would prolly still overlap with both units and chapter names Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117685 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 19 hours ago, Marshal Reinhard said: It's also the way of the Templars to dismantle the foe through sheer force of verbal disdain “What are we supposed to use? Harsh language?” ”yes” HolyPestilience, Marshal Reinhard, CastellanDeMolay and 1 other 2 2 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117688 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVoidDragon Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 That codex cover art is quite bad. That Marine in the middle looks like he has shoulder pads that are so big they'd be going all the way down to his waist. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117709 Share on other sites More sharing options...
01RTB01 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 4 hours ago, Alternis said: Are we sure the name isn’t Executor Isn't that the chap who's responsible for dealing with handling the estate upon death?... Brother, I present you with your brother's favoured bolter and chainsword. He wishes that you have them for smiting thy foes forevermore. Cactus, Rusted Boltgun, Inquisitor lorr and 3 others 1 2 3 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117712 Share on other sites More sharing options...
kabaakaba Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 What's wrong with pal in middle of cover art? Virtually it's normal sized head but there for rare occasion they draw space marine armor properly and show how large it is. There is issue with accents on art cause for some reason focus on acolyte guy in front. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117736 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Rohr Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 7 hours ago, 01RTB01 said: Isn't that the chap who's responsible for dealing with handling the estate upon death?... Brother, I present you with your brother's favoured bolter and chainsword. He wishes that you have them for smiting thy foes forevermore. It’s actually Darth Vader’s flagship. The model will be a 32mm Super Star Destroyer Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6117760 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorn of War Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 Well, I was wrong. They’ve only gone and called it an Execrator!!! Tokugawa and Rusted Boltgun 1 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6118013 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Marshal Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 And the rules teases have begun. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123391 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vassakov Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 No Oath for Templars seems like a pretty big sidegrade at best. DemonGSides 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123398 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxom Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 7 minutes ago, Vassakov said: No Oath for Templars seems like a pretty big sidegrade at best. For casual play, I think it depends on what strats are available. Suffer Not the Unclean allows for a lot of movement jankiness and that can be valuable for tournament players. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123399 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonGSides Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 (edited) Choices are always better than no choices, and there's plenty of hit Re-roll found scattered throughout the SM force that I think most of the Templar Vows are just straight up better than re-roll to hit when targeting a single unit each turn. Sticky obj one also allowing Advance and Action is I think a sleeper hit. Accept Any Challenge is good in the army with how much melee threats there are and gives them a target into bigger things; S8 powerfists with +1 to wound are pretty gnarly into basically everything. Cool changes. Makes me wish all the supplementary SM got updated army rules. Edited July 21 by DemonGSides Dark Shepherd 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123401 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blindhamster Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 Interesting they don’t get sternguard. 8 minutes ago, DemonGSides said: Choices are always better than no choices, and there's plenty of hit Re-roll found scattered throughout the SM force that I think most of the Templar Vows are just straight up better than re-roll to hit when targeting a single unit each turn. Sticky obj one also allowing Advance and Action is I think a sleeper hit. Accept Any Challenge is good in the army with how much melee threats there are and gives them a target into bigger things; S8 powerfists with +1 to wound are pretty gnarly into basically everything. Cool changes. Makes me wish all the supplementary SM got updated army rules. I’ve always said blood angels red thirst should have been the army rule instead of oath of moment. CastellanDeMolay and DemonGSides 1 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123404 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshal Reinhard Posted July 21 Share Posted July 21 4 minutes ago, DemonGSides said: Choices are always better than no choices, and there's plenty of hit Re-roll found scattered throughout the SM force that I think most of the Templar Vows are just straight up better than re-roll to hit when targeting a single unit each turn. Sticky obj one also allowing Advance and Action is I think a sleeper hit. Accept Any Challenge is good in the army with how much melee threats there are and gives them a target into bigger things; S8 powerfists with +1 to wound are pretty gnarly into basically everything. Cool changes. Makes me wish all the supplementary SM got updated army rules. The +1 to wound on the powerfists would only activate againsts target with toughness 8 or greater. Of course you can argue against low toughness targets, the S8 is already gnarly. Still, I think the effect might be more keenly felt with mass number of lower strength attacks, like the chainswords on a 20 man crusader squad, vs equal or higher toughness opponents. Dark Shepherd 1 Back to top Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/386134-codex-supplement-black-templars-new-ancient/page/5/#findComment-6123405 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now