Hive by Dan Abnett

[Casual Heresy]

Your first chance to get Hive is next week in a limited edition slipcase set. 
 

https://www.warhammer-community.com/en-gb/articles/cqdcnxdx/sunday-preview-chaos-and-order-battle-in-the-city-of-ash/

Edited April 12 by Casual Heresy

[The Praetorian of Inwit]

Scalpers going to love that.

[Firedrake Cordova]

I guess that means we'll see the regular release in a month or two, then..? (I'm struggling to remember what the delay was between the limited- and regular release of Interceptor City)

Edited April 13 by Firedrake Cordova

[Alby the Slayer]

Yep, as @Taliesinsaid, probably between may and july now.

 

I think I will wait. I dread the price on this one and I have already a lot to read. I'm a little tired of the extra steps and the price needed to acquire LE books.

[son of the forest]

Preorder is now delayed for this, the Sunday preview article has been updated

[Neil H]

I wonder if they have pulled it in case scalpers crash the website as the City of Ashes release at the same time could really be screwed up?

Just a thought?

Neil

[Sothalor]

At two days from an announced release date? It's far more likely there was some issue in the shipping/logistics chain or a last-minute QC catch on some manufacturing or printing defect.

[son of the forest]

This has been stealth added to the Sunday Preview, not clear whether its the limited edition or standard hardback

[Casual Heresy]

If it is the standard edition this week then I will defiently get that and not pursue the limited edition which seems to have disappeared into the warp.

[Mmmmm Napalm]

On 3/15/2026 at 1:13 PM, Cleon said:

I recognise some of the arguements around the BL authors from ones I've had - personally I've avoided Abnett's books after reading a few because I've never felt he's playing in the same setting as I am - in his hands it's often felt more like a generic version of a Clarke/Asimov sci fi future than the more dogmatic, dark and messy setting I've loved since 2nd ed. 

bit late but now that finals are over i feel more comfortable taking the time to respond on this lol

so I broadly agree that abnetts work as a whole feels slightly disconnected, with the caveat that when he takes less liberties with the setting's mechanics as a whole, I think it still fits comfortably into established canon and I don't mind. As stated in such things as the Dark Heresy core book, the Imperium is host to many, many worlds, and is far from culturally monolithic. So while a world like Gershom is not an oppressively congested claustrophobic Hive City, and its unwilling inhabitant Valeintin Drusher is not a torch wielding zealot, they're both perfectly capable of fitting quite comfortably into the setting. I'd rather we see more deviations from the norm than less, so as to better represent the Imperium's unfathomable diversity of worlds and cultures. Gershom not being a living hell does not invalidate or cancel out the misery of a Hive World nor the dystopian nature of the Imperium on a macro level.

 

Part of the issue with Abnett is that his work varies considerably; compare Horus Rising to Legion, written shortly afterwards. But with respect to the 40k era specfically, I think that he takes too many liberties with certain aspects or concepts in the setting (i think he is too liberal with the notion of rejuvenat effectiveness, and the collars that cancel out Null effects, to say nothing of his meddling in core setting narrative stuff), but if hes just telling a localized, typical 40k story he's fine. I'll take Abnett's more frequent depiction of planets slightly nicer than the norm* over "HERESY BLAM XDDDDD" ad infinitum. I understand that for some people, the appeal of this setting is to be as over the top as possible nad I respect that stance, I personally think outlandish over the top stuff can easily coexist with other tones and types of stories and I think the ability of the setting to embrace both is a positive quality.

 

*I actually don't think Abnett's that unusual in his depiction of the Imperium being slightly less dystopian than what is presented in the main Rulebooks and Codices. one of the claims ive seen repeated on places like reddit is "the imperium used to be depicted more negatively, now they depict it positively to cater to little timmy!!" frankly, i do not think this is the case. The earlier BL stories from well known authors like abnett and mitchell seem to go less hard on the ultra-misery angle, at least in my experience. 

 

I think my favorite depiction of the setting, in terms of being very balanced, grim but not "AND THEY SERVITORIZE YOU FOR BEING 30SEC LATE!!!" tier, would be Farrer's Enforcer trilogy

Edited 5 hours ago by Mmmmm Napalm

[phandaal]

1 hour ago, Mmmmm Napalm said:

The earlier BL stories from well known authors like abnett and mitchell seem to go less hard on the ultra-misery angle, at least in my experience. 

 

Both Abnett and Mitchell do a good job of showing that there is a human society behind everything in the setting, and that it can vary wildly from place to place. What always comes to mind for me is Ciaphas Cain quoting a popular catch phrase from the "Arbiter Foreboding" holo-dramas. 

 

It also makes the setting feel more realistic when they acknowledge that many places in the Imperium can and do experience peace for centuries or even millennia at a time. Localizing the events actually makes the setting feel larger. It is a good reminder of just how enormous a galaxy-spanning civilization would have to be.