Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm just finished this novel, and I'm kinda shocked or not see any discussion thread on here. I've been a pretty big fan of Annandale in 40k (NOT Heresy, his works there did not impress me) since reading Death of Antagonis back when I got back into the hobby (2018ish?). I quite enjoyed this novel, it's portrayal of the Word Bearers really pulled me towards them I haven't felt before. As a fan of Lost and the Damned, the portrayal of cultists and mortal followers also peaked my interest and had me wanting more from their perspective 

 

The antagonist Soroitas were also intriguing in their role as villains. I've read most of the Sister-centric literature, and this portrayal of them was a unique take. Mark of Faith and Pilgrims of Fire portrayed them as heroic saviors and crusaders (with their touches of grimdark, of course). None of that exists here. They are brutal, efficient, and merciless. They are also powerful. I often feel like Sisters are often portrayed as guardsmen in power armor; this book reminds you just how well trained and fanatical them are. Their portrayal reminds me both of Redemption Corp (Which is an insane and underappreciated novel, imo) and Twice-Dead King. The former is due to their shared antagonists being Sisters of Battle, the latter due to how terrifying it portrays the Imperium as antagonists.

 

I think my biggest disappointment was the lack of Annandales general wackiness I remember from Death of Antagonis and his horror novels. It was certainly there, especially towards the end, but it wasn't as prevalent.

 

Spoilers for DoA

Spoiler

That novel had a planetoid made of pure adamantine that would spin and grind against planets.

 

Overall, a quite pleasant read and I would definitely recommend. I'm baffled that they abandoned the Renegades imprint, because this alongside the recent NL novel felt like they should of been on that series.

Link to comment
https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/387853-apostle-by-david-annadale/
Share on other sites

Although I have found Annandale a bit hit or miss in the past, I picked this up and was glad I did.  The storyline pulled me in and flowed fairly smoothly (not always a thing with his novels).  I especially liked his take on the Adepta Sororitas.  These are the grimdark religious harpies I expected when I first came across them; not the ‘nuns with guns’ cliche we normally see from GW.  They were almost as scary as the chaos worshipers.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Support 1

Dunno how I missed this thread earlier today, but Ill pile on the praise.

 

I am not a huge Word Bearer fan, but Apostle is really fantastic. It helped me appreciate the Legion in the same way that the Bile trilogy did for the Emperors Children. Easily a book Id recommend and I hope Annandale does more Chaos in the future

2 hours ago, Neil H said:

Really enjoyed the book, I like the way the followers stories were built up alongside.

Quick break with a Skaven read and now a quarter trough Zardu LE.

Neil

 

I didn't touch on it much, but I really enjoyed the two acolytes. I'm a big LatD fan, so getting some perspective from the cultist side is always welcome. 

 

On 4/29/2026 at 2:52 AM, Felix Antipodes said:

Although I have found Annandale a bit hit or miss in the past, I picked this up and was glad I did

 

I defintiely understand being weary. I'm a big fan of Annandale, but some of his stories have been mediocre. His heresy stuff in particular just didn't work for me, what little I read. I think when he is given room to explore the setting on his own he does great.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

Apostle - David Annandale

 

This was decent, but I wanted to like it more.

 

The Good

 

Cerastes is a very classic Word Bearer. He's overconfident, conniving, unironically pious, and will choose corruption over destruction any day. He's stock, but done with a skill and reverence, and any Word Bearer that's not a hackneyed attempt to imitate Argel Tal is good in my books.

 

I love the portrayal of the Ecclesiarchy here; they make the book as far as I'm concerned. This is a war of faith vs faith, and how half-measures inevitably crumple before unthinking zealotry. I enjoy any story that inverts the "evil Cardinal and reasonable Battle Sister" trope, and this book does it with gusto. Cardinal Mazarine is hardly a good person - he's unthinkingly dogmatic, bound by tradition, and prefers others to do the hard work for him. But he's not especially corrupt or abusive of his position, and he understands he has a duty to the world he governs. Palatine Aesura makes him look positively benign in comparison, all fire and brimstone, and she's just itching for an excuse to burn Legitur to the ground. Even when the Battle Sisters are away during the first 2 thirds, Mazarine intimately knows what kind of "salvation" the planet'll receive if they need to call for their aid.

 

The world itself is wonderfully 40k, too. Legitur is a world devoted to scripture, to the point where they have entirely too much of it and have just started heaping overproduced pages into enormous mountains of excess vellum. For the world's inhabitants, scripture is a way of life. For the Battle Sisters, scripture is a gateway to heresy: full of excess detail and interpretation when the God-Emperor should be worshipped unthinkingly. Specifics could give rise to contradictions, doubts, or undue sympathies, and Aesura has no time for such things. Both factions fully subscribe to the Just World fallacy, and it's no wonder the underclasses are so easily swayed when "if you suffer, it's because you deserve it" is so ingrained into the church's culture.

 

You can always tell when Annandale is actually writing what he wants to. This book is a war of faiths and is thus mostly rumination and conversation. There's some gnarly violence peppered throughout, but never more than the plot requires - always welcome in a 40k book.

 

The Bad

 

Annandale certainly loves writing about faith, but I've rarely loved how he chooses to do so; this book is a showing of his weaknesses as a writer as well as his strengths, in my opinion. It's often shallow, and the amount of hysteria and corruption Cerastes manages to sow nearly on his own sometimes beggars belief. Yes, I can buy his rallying the destitute; the church doesn't care to deal with them in the first place. But your average middle-hive citizen, especially on a pseudo-shrine world, is going to have the teachings of the Ministorum hammered into them from birth - it should inform their entire mode of thinking. Defecting to Chaos isn't on the other side of a strong debate, it's an argument that triangle has 4 sides. 

 

When it comes down to it, this book is a war of ideals that Annandale either lacks the skill, or the space, to make convincing, rendering much of the conflict feeling totally arbitrary. Cerastes converts and absurd amount of people, the PDF shows up and ruins all his plans, he prays to the gods for insight, and gets a new way to convert an absurd amount of people, etc. Cerastes making planetfall and building the foundations of his plan is good. Cerastes triggering his plan and going toe-to-toe with Aesura at the end is good. Everything in the middle is a drag because the story's just going through the motions, and every step towards the inevitable is boring even on the first read. Cerastes makes the religious equivalent of "You critique society and yet you live in it? Curious," and it just keeps working. I don't think Annandale knows how large a planet is, much less a Hive City.

 

Also, Cerastes' apothecary buddy starts to doubt his ability partway through but it never goes anywhere.

 

The Verdict

 

I wouldn't say I disliked this, but I did come out the other side wishing the loyalists were the protagonists. Mazarine's desperate, but futile, attempts to hold back the tide of corruption while a Sororitas-shaped Sword of Damocles hangs over his head engaged me far more than Cerastes' improbable effectiveness at stirring up trouble. Annandale has a good understanding of the mind of a Word Bearer, and it's easy to see this was the story he wanted to tell, but the characters aren't exactly deep. But if I'm ever again tempted to read a story about a traitor marine plunging a Hive City into chaos on his own, I'll just re-read Lord of the Night.

It's fine, read it if it sounds interesting to you. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.