Kol Saresk Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Okay, so for those who don't know, this is the description up on Forgeworld's page: "One of the most advanced armoured units in the arsenal of the Great Crusade, the Sicaran Battle Tank was the exclusive province of the Space Marine Legions. The Sicaran utilises component technologies from various STC patterns to create a high-speed ‘destroyer’ tank to complement the more commonplace Predator and Land Raider designs. The primary armament of the main Sicaran variant is the sophisticated Herakles pattern accelerator autocannon, a superior rapid-firing and highly accurate weapon. It fires shells at far higher velocities than a standard autocannon, enabling it to successfully track and engage swift moving targets and pinpoint vulnerabilities in enemy armour with lethal precision. " Would I be right in thinking this is an anti-tank tank? And a while back, I was talking about building something like a light armor/calvary army. Could this take a spot in there as my anti-twnk department and leave me to focus the rest on transports and anti-infantry? Provided I manage it properly? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
spu00sed Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 I'm looking forwards to the rules. Will it have even more shots? Stronger shots? Ignore jinx saves? What other secondary weapons will it have? As for your questions it is hard to tell. The thing looks land raider size so we could be looking at AV13 4 hull points. It would make a fine centrepiece flanked by predator squadrons. Shame we can't take razorbacks well. That would be a lovely armoured force. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425415 Share on other sites More sharing options...
daryl Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 From the description it looks very much like an anti-tank platform, but I doubt it is intended to be an counter to super heavies. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425420 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted August 16, 2013 Author Share Posted August 16, 2013 Well I wasn't think that big lol. If I'm playing super heavies then I'll probably sink points into two or three and do some heavy coordination. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425445 Share on other sites More sharing options...
calgar101 Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 It depends on its weapons as to whether it is a true anti-tank vehicle or if it is a light vehicle popper. It looks awesome though, definitely going to get one. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425528 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denison512 Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 I'm wondering whether they will throw out some 40k rules so we can use it in normal games :) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425561 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apothecary Vaddon Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Dunno if fluff-wise it could be considered a TD...TDs IRL often had lolhuge howitzers/powerful anti tank guns mounted on them (Hetzer, Hellcat, Archer, etc) on either turretless or turreted tops. The idea was that you could blow right past all that crazy frontal armor on the tanks and rip them apart from a distance, since all you were doing was mounting what would typically be infantry-mobile anti-tank guns onto the chassis of an existing tank. From the description for the Sicaran, it's not a dedicated TD, it's like a dedicated light/medium tank killer. Since there aren't really light or medium tanks in either HH or present time, it'd be more akin to a AA hunter or a transport killer. Of course, if the Herakles pattern autocannon is more akin to a railgun than an autocannon, then all bets are off, and this thing could be a beast. But if it's still just an autocannon, the best it could do against an MBT in 40/30k would be to track it. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425946 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted August 17, 2013 Author Share Posted August 17, 2013 What about the lascannon sponsons? Would the "squadron" idea still work with all of that taken into account? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425955 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostMalone Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 if they are happy with predators and land raiders in a squad I reckon its a safe bet for 3 to be in the massacre release Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425969 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cod Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Yes, it will be interesting to see the rules, and if up to 3 are allowed as a squadron. They would sell heaps that way too. In the FW description, the part that says... enabling it to successfully track and engage swift moving targets I wonder if the 'swift' part is reference to skimmers also? As well as fast moving tanks/vehicles. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3425973 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyaenidae Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 From the description it looks very much like an anti-tank platform, but I doubt it is intended to be an counter to super heavies. Though it's obviously larger, I'm leaning more towards a Light Tank, capability wise. Like the defunct Sheridan, Stridsfordon 90, or even the M1128 Stryker. Instead of a modular design, though, it attempts to be a jack of all trades. With Las, it can target MBT's at an acceptable range. The AAC's can pick apart AFV's, IFV's and heavy infantry. The AAC's tied to a slick TarComp could cause low-n-slow airframes to drop from the sky due to TPS (Traumatic Perforation Syndrome). Heavier armour than a Pred, but lighter than a Raider, it could potentially fit a very obvious gap in Legion Mechanized units. Time will tell, of course. Personally, It's size and height will preclude it from defense, being such a royal pain to put hull-down, and the loss of the Las if I did so. On the attack, though, it could have a very solid role as a Heavy Cavalry unit in a spearhead, or blended with a squadron of smaller Preds to flank and swipe. Ahhhh, my inner Dog Faced Soldier is smiling warmly right now. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3426009 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfroCampbell Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 from the description and the weapon load-out, I think we are looking at a heavy-infantry/transport/skimmer killer. I'm gonna roll it with a 100pt Predator (autocannon + twin linked bolter sponsons) for some serious dakka. What I am interested is whether or not we will see different turret options....... Sicaran Executioner or Lascannon anybody? ;) on that note it was mentioned in a FW email that on gameday UK this year we would be seeing NEW TANKS (plural) shown off, alongside, primarch #3 (Ferrus Manus) and a new unit of Death Guard (yus!!!!) Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3426929 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rift Blade Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Like the look of it & it would be nice if there was 40K rules for it. Guess we'll just have to wait & see. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3426984 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hisdudeness Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I'm thinking the AAC will be a AC with more shots. Balance wise, I don't see them upping the strength or AP. More shots as S7 on a more robust platform would be great. I would also not like to see 40k rules...keep it 30k so more people will want to play 30k lists instead of cherry picking cool 30k units for a 40k list. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3427296 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted August 18, 2013 Author Share Posted August 18, 2013 Especially ince one of the oldest premises of 40K is that most of the technology of 30K does not survive the Heresy. Or at least, not in the hands of the Loyalists. Which is confusing since the Loyalists have more toys than the people who build things like stalker-tanks and planetkillers. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3427317 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onisuzume Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 It depends on its weapons as to whether it is a true anti-tank vehicle or if it is a light vehicle popper. It looks awesome though, definitely going to get one.I suspect it'll be popping non-super-heavies. Seeing the turret/weapon/description, I'd say Heavy 2, S7, AP3, Twin-Linked, Armourbane (or Lance). Tank Hunters on the tank might be possible too, but I think it'd be unlikely. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3428445 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted August 19, 2013 Author Share Posted August 19, 2013 Yeah, I'm not expecting to go around popping Fellblades and Glaives with only one of the things, I'm just thinking that maybe if it is strong enough, a squadron of the things would be very decent anti-armor. Maybe not against super-heavies, but still a decent shot. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3428576 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hisdudeness Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 I'm thinking that the AAC will be Heavy 3 or 4 version of a normal AC. Giving it Armourbane would make even a normal AC a good TD and even superheavy killer. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3428636 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telhdrat Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I'm thinking that the AAC will be Heavy 3 or 4 version of a normal AC. Giving it Armourbane would make even a normal AC a good TD and even superheavy killer. Given that the basic Predator autocannon is already a Heavy 4 in Betrayal, that would be a bit underwhelming. I'd say armourbane would fit the description quite well, but we'll just have to wait (come on September, get here already!) and see. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3429157 Share on other sites More sharing options...
hisdudeness Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 True that, completely forgot about the Pred Cannon. Humm, adding armourbane and the side Lascannons might make it too powerful. Even at Heavy 2/armourbane with 2 lascannons can drop a landraider in one turn. I can't wait either. Already have the money earmarked for pre-order. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3430333 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Angel Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 It will probably be Hvy 4 or better. The cool thing is that there is room in the design for a bigger AT gun Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3430393 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kol Saresk Posted August 21, 2013 Author Share Posted August 21, 2013 Maybe they'll throw in an overheat thing? To balance it out? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3430472 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onisuzume Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 Maybe they'll throw in an overheat thing? To balance it out?Maybe if it had Lance.It will probably be Hvy 4 or better. The cool thing is that there is room in the design for a bigger AT gunYeah, I forgot they had better autocannons during the heresy. >_> Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/278516-sicaran-battle-tank/#findComment-3430531 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.