Jacinda Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?399748-Codex-Releases-for-the-rest-of-2014&p=7262413&viewfull=1#post7262413 In a rumor about codex releases until end of year: "Codex Inquisition There was a hint that Sisters of Battle could be included in the Codex." I am highly skeptical but since it can be fun to speculate I want to ask, would you be willing to be rolled up with the Inquisition (again) if it means new models? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight of the Raven Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 I plan to field sisters of battle with the Legiones Astartes crusade army list, so I'd be okay with it as long as I get plastic models with armor that's not paper thin. Keep the breasts on their armor though. I love their aesthetics in a surprisingly non sexual way. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799057 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templar1 Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 I wouldn't count on it. Those rumors have been pretty far off so far, as well. So as much as I'd love to have an Inquisition hardback/update, even more so some Sisters of Battle, I think it's a long shot. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799136 Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Furyou Miko Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 No... not really. I don't want to be rolled into the Inquisition for the sake of making us Inquisition troops. We're not. We're our own, proud fighting force. I'd rather go back to being two units in a mini codex for use as allies than be rolled back into the Inquisition, to be honest. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799263 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warsmith Aznable Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 The Cardinal and the Canonness both agree: the Church does not need loose cannons of dubious piety sticking their noses into their Holy business. As a fan of the faction, such a huge part of Imperial life really shouldn't play second fiddle to anybody in a codex. I'd like to see Codex: Ecclediarcy, honestly. Expand on the named HQs, expand on Church only forces. Stick us under the Inquisition again? I'd rather play with the e-codex forever. If they stick us with the =I= I'll still play it, but damned if I let those weirdos anywhere near my Sisters. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799303 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Orlock Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 If we go back to the very first book, a significant portion of the list was the Frateris Miliia. I would be glad of it's return. If this requires the presence of Inquisitorial, or Arbite oversight to at least maintain the spirit of the decree, well, that's fine by me. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799406 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WAR Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Sisters and ecclieshiarchy only for this Sisters of battle player! =][= is good as an overpriced ally/ supplemental but why should we be rolled into their dex? Cause the GKs lost their =][= doesn't mean we should br the replacement force Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799434 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Orlock Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Don't think of it as being suborned by the Inquisition, think of it as subverting elements of the inquisition for ecclastic purposes. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799460 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warsmith Aznable Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 The gates of damnation are adorned with compromises and rationalisations. EDIT: Smiley face added... Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799497 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorFish Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 This rumour is so wobbly you could take it to fun fares and charge for admission. For the record I gather my salt from the sea, easier that way and cheaper plus you can get it in the quantities you need as a SoB player :P Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799645 Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Furyou Miko Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Not to mention tastier, according to the salt companies. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799670 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvih Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Well, my main codex already got rolled, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised if what is supposed to be(come) my secondary army going forward would end up rolled too Still, Inquisition and Ecclesiarchy in the same codex wouldn't necessarily be all bad. Both on their own are basically minidexes, so at least in the sense of making an actual physical book it'd probably be more feasible for GW to combine the two. And it doesn't mean either faction would necessarily suffer as a result. Whatever happens, as long as it does the Sisters justice in fluff and crunch (as in at least not making it worse!), I'm not so fussed. I basically need both books anyway. In the meanwhile I just applied some extra salt to the steaks I was cooking in response to this. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799690 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorFish Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Even if it is true it'd likely be similar to the Witch Hunter days in which case you could just ignore the non-Sister elements if you wanted. How the codex comes is increasingly becoming irrelevant as what really matters is new models. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799696 Share on other sites More sharing options...
geitmeise Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 Perhaps it's just a way to make the codex available in a non-digital format? As in "The Inquisition codex is quite small for a hardback. We might aswell throw in the current Adepta Sororitas codex since it doesn't have its own harback either." Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799752 Share on other sites More sharing options...
incinerator950 Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 If you guys want, there is an adjacent, untainted mountain of salt next to the one us Chaos players use. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799774 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacinda Posted September 4, 2014 Author Share Posted September 4, 2014 Even if it is true it'd likely be similar to the Witch Hunter days in which case you could just ignore the non-Sister elements if you wanted. Back then we called it a Faithful list. It was a polite way of saying no boys allowed. No psykers, no IST lascanons, no Inquisitor Lords. Faithful units only; as in Sisters of Battle with no un-needed tag-alongs. I was not fond of Witchhunter days. It always seemed like a forced arangement. It is true the Adepta Sororitas and the Inquisition can have similar goals but their agendas a quite often at odds. If you had to combine them in a single book, wouldn't make more sense to have Codex: Ecclesiarchy with the Inqusition being included as a part of that? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799901 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorFish Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 More options is better, always will be but with the inclusion of allies in the rules it makes a merged codex seem even less likely. Let me know if we get a new rumour about models, we may as well shove anything else we hear straight into the outbox. Which is also the bin in case you were wondering Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3799913 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenith Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?399748-Codex-Releases-for-the-rest-of-2014&p=7262413&viewfull=1#post7262413 In a rumor about codex releases until end of year: "Codex Inquisition There was a hint that Sisters of Battle could be included in the Codex." I am highly skeptical but since it can be fun to speculate I want to ask, would you be willing to be rolled up with the Inquisition (again) if it means new models? I thought this was the hardback release of the (up until now) electronic Codex: Inquisition. Sorritas already have their own eCodex, right? They wont be in this. Even more so as the greyKnights have just had the =][= stripped from their codex. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3800021 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoqqu Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 That sororitas ecodex is in the same league with the abomination csm had between 3.5 and now. It shouldn't be mentioned. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3800723 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacefrisian Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 That edex doesnt even have new shiny units in it, just a lazy excuse. And as there is no hardback cover for it i stil use the White Dwarf version for my Sisters of battle. GW says sisters dont sell, i say everyone with Sisters of battle already got there army together 14 years ago, why should they keep buying the old metal ones? Gw cant figure that out. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3800743 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stercus Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 I can't see them rolling two factions into one book. If anything, the trend nowadays is to split armies down into as many separate publications as possible. (Templars apologetically excepted). Why sell your punters one £30 book when you can sell them two £20 books? Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3800771 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templar1 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 I wouldn't mind if they were lumped in again, TBH. Then again my interest first started with the Witch Hunter Codex. I love the aesthetic of an Inquisitor and his bolter babes running around immolating heretics and psykers. Feels very Gothic/grimdark. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3801155 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepower Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 No... not really. I don't want to be rolled into the Inquisition for the sake of making us Inquisition troops. We're not. We're our own, proud fighting force. I'd rather go back to being two units in a mini codex for use as allies than be rolled back into the Inquisition, to be honest. I pray for you to be spared such a fate. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3801221 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ullr Direfang Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Keep the breasts on their armor though. I love their aesthetics in a surprisingly non sexual way. Thant and the Heels. I would take a hard copy of rules, and new models IF you could tell them apart, and they still looked like ladies. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3801393 Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Furyou Miko Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 That sororitas ecodex is in the same league with the abomination csm had between 3.5 and now. It shouldn't be mentioned. Thus spake someone who's never played it. The E-codex is actually a very well written army list. Link to comment https://bolterandchainsword.com/topic/296232-i-hope-you-own-a-salt-mine-for-this-one/#findComment-3801431 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.