Charlo Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 Honestly, you know what would work THE BEST? Age of Sigmar's ruleset for monsters and war machines. Have a set amount of wounds and how many you have depends on how your movement or shooting is affected. Maybe when you are down to 50% vehicle wounds, further wounds will have a chance to immobilise or stun for a turn. A Rhino and land raiders resilience and reliability Coukd be represented by them always being able to move no matter the wounds they had etc. The rules both forge an excellent narrative and interesting game play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quixus Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 It does ruin the "forging the narrative" a little, if vehicles cannot be weapon destroyed/immobilised anymore. GW is already ruining "forging the narrative". A monstrous creature cannot have its arm chopped off and then proceed to beat the perpetrator with it. @Charlo: That does sound interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unseen Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I'd keep the ability to cause damage on a high to wound rather than penetrating hit, make a chart for both vehicles and creatures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Hate to be a nag, but lets keep this thread away from homebrewing and wishlisting please. Cheers. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frater Antodeniel Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 · Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked As a reminder, here is THE FAQ/Errata wishlist : Note that the following is unofficial and of Frater Antodeniel's own making - Jolemai Antodeniel - Added the "Un-offical". But remember, Jolemai, that this work is partly a team work....it isn't only my "own" making^^. Link to comment
Arkangilos Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Yeah, I'm against vehicles with toughness rather than armor value, and against Charlo's idea, but this isn't for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 · Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked As a reminder, here is THE FAQ/Errata wishlist : Note that the following is unofficial and of Frater Antodeniel's own making - Jolemai http://i.imgur.com/erna0cw.png http://i.imgur.com/PtlAGm3.png You need to stamp this with your name like you do your other stuff, change it from "official" to "unofficial" and alter the lead text. Right now it violates GW's IP quite seriously and as such, it violates the rules of the B&C. Thanks. Link to comment
Dont-Be-Haten Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Dark Angels FAQ just dropped. Some interesting albeit silly questions were asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damon Nightman Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Darn GW would you get to the real Angels already please! Almost cursed there until I remembered the rules lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 Have GK been yet? It seems they are at least doing all the Marine Factions now. My bet is we'll be in the next two weeks with some hope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Dark Angels FAQ just dropped. Some interesting albeit silly questions were asked. Was half hoping that someone would have asked about the Adeptus Astartes power deck just to simply stop the arguments over its use outside of C:SM, but I guess the deck was released after the FAQ question thread. Found anything transferable to us yet? I can't see anything of note... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NTaW Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Rest easy knowing the Fb page has committed to new FAQ stuff every Wednesday. It's only a matter of weeks now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaplain Gunzhard Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Dark Angels FAQ just dropped. Some interesting albeit silly questions were asked. Was half hoping that someone would have asked about the Adeptus Astartes power deck just to simply stop the arguments over its use outside of C:SM, but I guess the deck was released after the FAQ question thread. Found anything transferable to us yet? I can't see anything of note... You talking about the Psychic Power deck? ...I don't have them in front of me but I'm entirely sure on the first card it says which disciplines (of the new powers) that Blood Angels can use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 Dark Angels FAQ just dropped. Some interesting albeit silly questions were asked. Was half hoping that someone would have asked about the Adeptus Astartes power deck just to simply stop the arguments over its use outside of C:SM, but I guess the deck was released after the FAQ question thread. I think the Deck comes with a card that says who can use it - if not the WD certainly had a chart. Found anything transferable to us yet? I can't see anything of note... Nah - nothing for us in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolemai Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Guys, I know it does. Doesn't mean people don't argue about it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaplain Gunzhard Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Guys, I know it does. Doesn't mean people don't argue about it... Ha yeah this community is so incredibly ridiculous sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlo Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 Oh wow. How can people dispute what is written on the cards?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkangilos Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Oh wow. How can people dispute what is written on the cards?! Because they are people, and people suck. That's why Horus and them wanted everything to burn. "What do you mean I can't use that power? It's on my card!" "No! It doesn't matter! It's for only them!" *begins heresy to kill all humans for their dumb behavior* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frater Antodeniel Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 · Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked Hidden by Jolemai, June 23, 2016 - Didn't comply, post nuked As a reminder, here is THE FAQ/Errata wishlist : Note that the following is unofficial and of Frater Antodeniel's own making - Jolemai http://i.imgur.com/erna0cw.png http://i.imgur.com/PtlAGm3.png You need to stamp this with your name like you do your other stuff, change it from "official" to "unofficial" and alter the lead text. Right now it violates GW's IP quite seriously and as such, it violates the rules of the B&C. Thanks. Change Done. But if it isn't enough, you are free to erase it. I personally don't really care, if you judge that it violates the B&C rules, you are free to erase the problematic post. Link to comment
Dont-Be-Haten Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 The Quick reference sheet that comes with the Adeptus Astartes psychic powers deck literally has a "Quick References" card that lists all the psychic powers available to each codex. How can people argue it? We get everything except Telekinesis and Telepathy, Codex: Space Marines get all Disciplines, Dark Angels get all but Biomancy, Deathwatch gets all, Grey Knights get all but Biomancy Demonology (Malefic) and Space wolves get all but Telepathy and Pyromancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenith Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Oh wow. How can people dispute what is written on the cards?! You'd be surprised, but a lot of people don't actually read the rules, just skim them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morticon Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Oh wow. How can people dispute what is written on the cards?! You'd be surprised, but a lot of people don't actually read the rules, just skim them. There are players all over the world, from a variety of backgrounds and languages - and more often than not rules "issues" are largely a problem of poor reading and understanding than anything else. Some of the questions clarified in the FAQ seem to back up that idea too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenith Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Sorry, that 'read' should have been italicised - by it, I mean read, digested and understood. Undoubtedly, language is also an issue, but there are plenty of native english speakers that also give the impression that they haven't given the rules a thorough read... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appiah4 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Dark Angels FAQ just dropped. Some interesting albeit silly questions were asked. Has anyone asked whether Dark Angels count as Chaos Space Marines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dont-Be-Haten Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Its like, someone actually asked if Cypher could be included in Dark Angels... But the reply was ambiguous. No, but if you want to have an army of Fallen and have them represented in the DA codex, clear it with your opponent first. I was just like "?????????"Blood of the Emperor! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.